2020 NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(Amendment No. )
Filed by the Registrant☒ Filed by a Party other than the Registrant☐
Check the appropriate box:
Preliminary Proxy Statement |
| ☐ | Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) |
| ☐ | Definitive |
| ☐ | Definitive Additional Materials |
| ☐ | Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12 |
Applied Materials, Inc.
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
| ☒ | No fee required. |
| ☐ | Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. |
| (1) | Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: |
| (2) | Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: |
| (3) | Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): |
| (4) | Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: |
| (5) | Total fee paid: |
| ☐ | Fee paid previously with preliminary materials: |
| ☐ | Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing. |
| (1) | Amount Previously Paid: |
| (2) | Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: |
| (3) | Filing Party: |
| (4) | Date Filed: |
2020 NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT
|
|
January 25, 2018, 2020
Dear Fellow Shareholders:
WeOn behalf of the Board of Directors, we are pleased to invite you to attend Applied Materials’ 20182020 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, which will be held on Thursday, March 8, 2018,12, 2020, at 11:00 a.m. Pacific Time at our corporate offices at 3050 Bowers Avenue, Building 1, Santa Clara, California 95054.
The attached Notice of 2018 Annual Meeting of Shareholders andWe encourage you to read this Proxy Statement describebecause it contains important information for voting your shares and sets forth how the Board oversaw your investment over the past year. This year’s Proxy Statement reflects our continued focus on our business strategy, an engaged and effective Board, sound corporate governance and executive compensation practices, our sustainability and corporate social responsibility strategy and our regular dialogue with and responsiveness to be conducted atour shareholders.
Financial Performance and Business Strategy
In fiscal 2019, Applied Materials delivered solid results in a challenging market environment that was shaped by down cycles in both semiconductor and display equipment spending. Our broad portfolio of products and technologies has helped make Applied a more resilient company that can perform well in a variety of conditions. We are carefully managing our spending while increasing our R&D investments in new capabilities and products that put us in a great position for the Annual Meeting. future.
We maintain a positive long-term view of our markets as major new growth drivers emerge in the form of the Internet of Things (IoT), big data and artificial intelligence (AI). As the industry transitions to this new era of computing, there is a tremendous need for innovation in semiconductors and displays, and we believe this creates exciting opportunities for Applied. We remain focused on working closely with our customers to accelerate their roadmaps and bring technology breakthroughs to market.
Shareholder Engagement
We are committed to effective corporate governance that is informed by our shareholders, promotes the long-term interests of our shareholders, and strengthens the Board’s and management’s accountability.
We have also made available a copyrobust shareholder outreach program that focuses on governance, compensation, environmental and sustainability issues of interest to our shareholders. The outreach is a recurring, year-round effort, led by a cross-functional team that includes members of our 2017 Annual ReportInvestor Relations, Global Rewards, Diversity and Inclusion, Environmental Health and Safety and Legal functions, with participation of independent directors where appropriate. Shareholder feedback directly informs the Board’s decision-making on Form10-Ka variety of matters.
In response to the high level of shareholder support at last year’s annual meeting for a proposal for shareholder action by written consent, management and directors engaged in an extensive shareholder outreach to hear directly from our shareholders on their views on the topic. Feedback received was shared and discussed with the Proxy Statement.
Your votefull Board. In response to the shareholder feedback and after careful consideration, the Board is very importantsubmitting for shareholder approval an amendment and restatement of our Certificate of Incorporation to us, and voting your proxy will ensure your representation at the Annual Meeting. Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, we urge you to vote as soon as possible and submit your proxy via the Internet, or if you requested to receive printed proxy materials,allow shareholder action by telephone or by signing, dating and returning your proxy card.written consent.
Thank you for your attention to these important matterscontinued investment in and for your continued support of Applied Materials.
Sincerely,
Gary E. Dickerson
President and Chief Executive Officer
Thomas J. Iannotti Chairman of the Board |
Gary E. Dickerson President and Chief Executive Officer |
3050 Bowers Avenue Santa Clara, California 95054 Phone:(408) 727-5555 | Mailing Address: Applied Materials, Inc. 3050 Bowers Avenue P.O. Box 58039 Santa Clara, California 95052-8039 |
NOTICE OF
20182020 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
Thursday, March 8, 201812, 2020
at 11:00 a.m. Pacific Time
The 20182020 Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Applied Materials, Inc. will be held on Thursday, March 8, 2018,12, 2020, at 11:00 a.m. Pacific Time at our corporate offices at 3050 Bowers Avenue, Building 1, Santa Clara, California 95054.
Items of Business
1. | To elect ten directors to serve for aone-year term and until their successors have been duly elected and qualified. |
2. | To approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of our named executive officers for fiscal year |
3. | To ratify the appointment of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year |
5. | To transact any other business that may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournment or postponement of the Annual Meeting. |
Your vote is important.important to us. You may vote via the Internet or by telephone, or if you requested to receive printed proxy materials, by signing, dating and returning your proxy card. If you are voting via the Internet or by telephone, your vote must be received by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, March 7, 2018.11, 2020. For specific voting instructions, please refer to the information provided in the following Proxy Statement, together with your proxy card or the voting instructions you receive bye-mail or that are provided via the Internet.
If you received a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials on how to access the proxy materials via the Internet, a proxy card was not sent to you, and you may vote only via the Internet, unless you have requested a paper copy of the proxy materials, in which case, you may also vote by telephone or by signing, dating and returning your proxy card. Shares cannot be voted by marking, writing on and returning the Notice of Internet Availability. Any Notices of Internet Availability that are returned will not be counted as votes. Instructions for requesting a paper copy of the proxy materials are set forth on the Notice of Internet Availability.
By Order of the Board of Directors |
  |
Corporate Secretary |
Santa Clara, California
January 25, 2018, 2020
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Shareholder Meeting to be held on March 8, 2018:12, 2020: The Proxy Statement and Annual Report to Shareholders are available atwww.proxyvote.com.
| Page | ||||
| i | ||||
| i | ||||
| i | ||||
| ii | ||||
Sustainability and Corporate | ||||
| Proposal 1—Election of Directors | 1 | |||
| 1 | ||||
| Board and Corporate Governance Practices | 7 | |||
| 7 | ||||
| 7 | ||||
| 8 | ||||
| 9 | ||||
| 9 | ||||
| 10 | ||||
| 10 | ||||
| 10 | ||||
| 11 | ||||
| 12 | ||||
| 12 | ||||
| 13 | ||||
| 14 | ||||
| 14 | ||||
| 14 | ||||
| Director Compensation | ||||
| Stock Ownership Information | ||||
| Proposal 2—Approval, on an Advisory Basis, of the Compensation of Our Named Executive Officers | ||||
| Compensation Discussion and Analysis | �� | |||
| 28 | ||||
| 29 | ||||
| 38 | ||||
| Page | ||||
| Human Resources and | 40 | |||
| Executive Compensation | 41 | |||
Summary Compensation Table for Fiscal | 41 | |||
Reconciliation ofnon-GAAP adjusted financial measures used in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section and elsewhere in this Proxy Statement, other than as part of disclosure of target levels, can be found in the Appendix.Appendix A.
Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
This Proxy Statement contains forward-looking statements, including those regarding anticipated growth and trends in our businesses and markets, industry outlooks, market share, technology transitions, our business, strategies and financial performance, our development of new products, technologies and capabilities, and other statements that are not historical fact, and actual results could differ materially. Risk factors that could cause actual results to differ are set forth in the “Risk Factors” section of, and elsewhere in, our 2019 Annual Report on Form10-K and other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. All forward-looking statements are based on management’s estimates, projections and assumptions as of the date hereof, and Applied Materials undertakes no obligation to update any such statements.
20182020 PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY
20182020 PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY
Your proxy is being solicited on behalf of the Board of Directors of Applied Materials, Inc. We are making this Proxy Statement available to shareholders beginning on January 25, 2018., 2020. This summary highlights information contained elsewhere in this Proxy Statement. We encourage you to read the entire Proxy Statement for more information prior to voting.
Annual Meeting of Shareholders
| Date and Time: | March | |
| Location: | Applied Materials, Inc., 3050 Bowers Avenue, Building 1, Santa Clara, California 95054 | |
| Record Date: | January | |
| Voting: | Shareholders as of the record date are entitled to vote. Each share of common stock is entitled to one vote for each director nominee and one vote for each of the proposals to be voted on. | |
| Attendance: | Shareholders and their duly appointed proxies may attend the meeting. | |
Proposals and Board Recommendations
| For More Information | Board Recommendation | |||||||
| Proposal 1 – Election of Directors | Pages 1 to 6 | ✓ FOR each Nominee | ||||||
Judy Bruner | Stephen R. Forrest |
| ||||||
Xun (Eric) Chen | Thomas J. Iannotti |
| ||||||
Aart J. de Geus Gary E. Dickerson | Alexander A. Karsner Adrianna C. Ma | |||||||
| Proposal 2 – Executive Compensation | Page | ✓ FOR | ||||||
Approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of our named executive officers for fiscal year | ||||||||
| Proposal 3 – Ratification of Registered Accounting Firm | Page 48 | ✓FOR | ||||||
Ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year | ||||||||
| Proposal 4 – | Pages 50 to 52 | |||||||
| ||||||||
| ||||||||
Applied Materials, Inc. i
| Name and Occupation | Age | Director Since | Independent | Committees | Age | Director Since | Independent | Committees | ||||||||
| Judy Bruner | 59 | 2016 | ✓ | Governance (Chair) |
61 |
2016 |
✓ |
Governance (Chair) | ||||||||
Executive Vice President, Administration and Chief Financial Officer, SanDisk Corporation (retired) | Audit | Audit
| ||||||||||||||
| Xun (Eric) Chen | 48 | 2015 | ✓ | Compensation |
50 |
2015 |
✓ |
Compensation | ||||||||
Chief Executive Officer, BaseBit Technologies, Inc. | Strategy | |||||||||||||||
Partner, SB Investment Advisers (US), Inc.
| Strategy
| |||||||||||||||
| Aart J. de Geus | 63 | 2007 | ✓ | Strategy (Chair) |
65 |
2007 |
✓ |
Strategy (Chair) | ||||||||
Chairman of the Board of Directors,Co-Chief Executive Officer, Synopsys, Inc. | Investment | Investment
| ||||||||||||||
| Gary E. Dickerson | 60 | 2013 |
62 |
2013 | ||||||||||||
President and Chief Executive Officer, Applied Materials, Inc. | ||||||||||||||||
| Stephen R. Forrest | 67 | 2008 | ✓ | Audit |
69 |
2008 |
✓ |
Audit | ||||||||
Professor of Electrical Engineering & Computer Science, Physics, and Materials Science & Engineering, University of Michigan | Strategy Investment | Strategy Investment
| ||||||||||||||
| Thomas J. Iannotti | 61 | 2005 | ✓ | Compensation (Chair) |
63 |
2005 |
✓ |
Compensation (Chair) | ||||||||
Senior Vice President and General Manager, Enterprise Services, Hewlett-Packard Company (retired) | ||||||||||||||||
| Alexander A. Karsner | 50 | 2008 | ✓ | Compensation |
52 |
2008 |
✓ |
Compensation | ||||||||
Managing Partner, Emerson Collective | Governance | |||||||||||||||
Senior Strategist, X
| Governance
| |||||||||||||||
| Adrianna C. Ma | 44 | 2015 | ✓ | Investment (Chair) |
46 |
2015 |
✓ |
Investment (Chair) | ||||||||
Managing Partner, Fremont Group | Audit Governance | |||||||||||||||
Managing Partner, Haleakala Holdings LLC | Audit Governance
| |||||||||||||||
Yvonne McGill |
52 |
2019 |
✓ |
Audit | ||||||||||||
Chief Financial Officer, Senior Vice President, Infrastructure Solutions Group and Global Financial Planning and Analysis, Dell Technologies
| ||||||||||||||||
| Scott A. McGregor | 61 | 2018 | ✓ |
63 |
2018 |
✓ |
Audit | |||||||||
President and Chief Executive Officer, Broadcom Corporation (retired) | Strategy
| |||||||||||||||
| Dennis D. Powell | 70 | 2007 | ✓ | Audit (Chair) | ||||||||||||
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Cisco Systems, Inc. (retired) | Governance Investment | |||||||||||||||
ii 2020 Proxy Statement
2020 PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY
Board Practices and Composition
Ensuring the Board is composed of directors who possess a wide variety of relevant skills, professional experience and backgrounds, bring diverse viewpoints and perspectives, and effectively represent the long-term interests of shareholders is a top priority of the Board and the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee. Our Board composition reflects strong Board practices that support regular refreshment based on board needs and proactive succession planning.
| Director Nominee Expertise | Key Attributes | |
|
Semiconductor Industry & Technology Financial and Accounting Global Business Strategy and Innovation Operations and Infrastructure Government Policy M&A and Organizational Growth Risk Management Public Company Board Experience Executive Leadership Independence 9 of 10 director nominees are independent Diversity 40% of director nominees are ethnically and/or gender diverse 30% are female 20% are ethnically diverse Tenure 2 directors added to Board over last 2 years > 10 years tenure 4-10 years tenure 0-4 years tenure 4 directors 3 directors 3 directors |
ii 2018 Proxy Statement
Semiconductor Industry and Technology 6 Financial and Accounting 3 Global Business 6 Strategy and Innovation 6 Operations and Infrastructure 4 Government Policy 2 M&A and Organizational Growth 5 Risk Management 6 Public Company Board Experience 8 Executive Leadership 6 Independent Board Chair 89% Director Independence Regular refreshment resulting in average director tenure of 7 years
2018 PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY
Board Practices Support Thoughtful Board Composition
Board Composition to Support Company Strategy |
The Board and the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee regularly evaluate the size and composition of the Board to ensure appropriate alignment with the Company’s evolving business and strategic needs. |
Policy on Board Diversity |
The Board is committed to having a Board that reflects diverse perspectives, including those based on gender, ethnicity, skills, experience at policy-making levels in areas that are relevant to the Company’s global activities, and functional, geographic or cultural background. The Board has adopted a Policy on Diversity as part of its Corporate Governance Guidelines, which highlights its commitment to actively seek out women and ethnically diverse director candidates. |
Annual Board Evaluations |
The Board conducts an annual self-assessment of Board, Board Committees and individual directors to evaluate effectiveness. |
Board Refreshment |
The Board believes the fresh perspectives brought by new directors are critical to a forward-looking and strategic Board when appropriately balanced by the deep understanding of Applied’s business provided by longer-serving directors. |
Director Succession Planning |
The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee reviews the short- and long-term strategies and interests of Applied to determine what current and future skills and experience are required of the Board in exercising its oversight function. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Applied Materials, Inc. iii
We are committed to effective corporate governance that is informed by our shareholders, promotes the long-term interests of our shareholders, and strengthens Board and management accountability.
Governance Highlights
✓ Annual Election of Directors | ✓ Shareholder Proxy Access | |
✓ Independent Chairman of the Board | ✓ No Poison Pill | |
✓ Highly Independent Board (9 of 10 Director nominees) and Committees | ✓ No Supermajority Vote Requirements | |
✓ Annual Board, Committee and Individual Evaluations | ✓ Majority Voting for Directors | |
✓ Robust Board Succession Planning | ✓ Regular Executive Sessions of Independent Directors | |
✓ Active Shareholder Engagement Practices | ✓ Stock Ownership Guidelines for Directors and Executives | |
✓Shareholder Right to Call a Special Meeting | ||
| ✓ | |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Shareholder Engagement
We believe that strong corporate governance should include regular engagement with our shareholders to enable us to understand and respond to shareholder concerns. We have a robust shareholder outreach program led by a cross-functional team that includes members of our Investor Relations, Global Rewards, Diversity and Inclusion, Environmental Health and Safety and Legal departments.functions. Independent members of our Board are also involved, as appropriate. In the fall, we solicit feedback on our executive compensation program, corporate governance and disclosure practices, and sustainability and corporate citizenshipinclusion and diversity initiatives, as well as any matters voted on at our prior annual meeting. After the filing of our proxy statement, we engage again with our shareholders about important topics to be addressed at our annual meeting. Following our annual meeting, we review the results of the meeting and investor feedback, as well as evaluate emerging trends in corporate governance and other areas. We share feedback we receive from our shareholders with ourthe Human Resources and Compensation Committee, our Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee, and the full Board. Shareholder input is then factored into the Board’s decision-making. See “Shareholder Engagement” on page 1213 for more information.
In response to the high level of shareholder support at last year’s annual meeting for the proposal on shareholder action by written consent, this year, we also engaged in extensive shareholder outreach to hear directly from our shareholders on their views on shareholder action by written consent, as well as our existing special meeting process. Some of our independent directors participated in the outreach with several of our shareholders. Feedback received from the shareholders was shared and discussed with the Board. See “Shareholder Engagement” on page 13 for more information.
Applied Materials, Inc. iviii 2020 Proxy Statement
2020 PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY
Company Overview
Applied Materials is the leader in materials engineering solutions used to produce virtually every new chip and advanced display in the world. Our expertise in modifying materials at atomic levels and on an industrial scale enables customers to transform possibilities into reality. At Applied Materials, our innovations make possible the technology shaping the future.
We develop, design, produce and service semiconductor and display equipment for manufacturers that sell into highly competitive and rapidly changing end markets. At Applied Materials,Our competitive positioning is driven by our innovations make possible theability to identify major technology shaping the future.inflections early, and to develop highly differentiated materials engineering solutions for our customers to enable those technology inflections. Through our broad portfolio of products and technologies, innovation leadership and focused investments in research and development, we are enabling our customers’ success and creating significant value for our shareholders.
20172019 Performance Highlights
Over the past several years, our broad portfolio of products and services has made Applied a more resilient company that can perform well in a variety of conditions. In 2017,2019, we celebrated our 50th anniversarydelivered solid performance against very aggressive targets in a challenging market environment that was affected by down cycles in both memory and deliveredall-time record revenue, operating profit and earnings per share.
display equipment spending. Key highlights include:
| ● | Revenue of |
| ● | Operating profit of |
| ● | Delivered operating |
| ● |
| Returned |
Highlights of five-year performance achievements across key financial measures
|  |  |
Non-GAAP adjusted operating margin andnon-GAAP adjusted EPS are performance targets under our bonus and long-term incentive plans. See Appendix A fornon-GAAP reconciliations.
ivApplied Materials, Inc. 2018 Proxy Statementv
Revenue RECORD HIGH $7.5B FY’13 +93% $14.5B FY’17 Non-GAAP Operating Margin 13.7% FY’13 +14 PTS 27.9% FY’17 Non-GAAP EPS RECORD HIGH $0.59 FY’13 +451% $3.25 FY’17
2018 PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY
Strategic and Operational Highlights
We believe the electronics industry is in a period of transition as major new growth drivers emerge in the form of the Internet of Things (IoT), big data and artificial intelligence (AI). In fiscal 2017,2019, we continued to drive profitable growth by targeting major technology inflectionsfocus on initiatives that will help accelerate our customers’ roadmaps and introducing new, differentiated, enabling products and services to help our customers address their most critical technological challenges.put Applied in the best position for the future. Key highlights include:
| ● | We continued to prioritize our |
| ● | In addition to advancements in |
| ● | We strengthened our capabilities to address the growing number of applications within the IoT, communications, automotive, power and |
| ● | We grew our installed base of |
| ● | We expanded our R&D capabilities by opening the Materials Engineering Technology Accelerator (META Center), astate-of-the-art facility aimed at speeding customer prototyping of new |
The Human Resources and Compensation Committee (“HRCC”) approved an aggressive set of scorecard targets for the executive officers for fiscal 2019, including financial targets above any levels that Applied had achieved in the past, as well as equally challenging operational targets. Although the aggressive targets resulted in below-target bonus payments, the Company expects to see market share growth for calendar year 2019 and also made significant progress on long-term growth initiatives.
Chief Financial Officer Transition.During fiscal 2019, Applied delivered solid financial and operational performance in a challenging environment and made meaningful progress towards our long-term strategic goals that are focused on enabling strong longer-term revenue and EPS growth; however, the results were below aggressively set targets. Accordingly, bonus payouts to our executive officers were below target bonus amounts. As part of our multi-year incentive program, for the period of 2017 to 2019, the HRCC approved aggressive goals fornon-GAAP adjusted operating margin and wafer fabrication equipment (“WFE”) market share. The results for this three-year performance period were above target, resulting in above target level performance share unit awards for our executive officers.
viIn August 2017, we welcomed a new Chief Financial Officer, Daniel J. Durn, who succeeded Robert J. Halliday. Mr. Durn brings significant industry experience and knowledge that will further accelerate our strategy. 2020 Proxy Statement
2020 PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY
Stock Price Performance
Our strong strategicIn fiscal 2019, our stock price performance reflected steady market optimism, particularly in the second half of the year, as the semiconductor market environment showed early signs of strength in foundry and financial performancelogic spending, and continued reduction in fiscal 2017 also resulted in meaningful value creation for our shareholders. As illustrated below,memory inventory levels. Over the past five years, Applied significantlyhas outperformed both our peer group and the S&P 500 Information Technology Index.Index, as shown below. In addition, Applied outperformed peers by over 40% in fiscal 2019.
FY2013FY2015 – FY2017FY2019 Total Shareholder Return vs. Key Peers
Applied Materials, Inc. vvii
Primary Compensation Elements and Executive Compensation Highlights for Fiscal 2019
The primary elements of our compensation program consist of base salary, annual incentive bonuses and long-term incentive awards. Other elements of compensation include a 401(k) savings plan, deferred compensation benefits and other benefits programs that are generally available to all employees. Primary elements and highlights of our fiscal 2019 compensation program were as follows:
| Element of Pay | Structure | Highlights | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Base Salary (see page 29) | ∎ | Fixed cash compensation for expectedday-to-day responsibilities | ∎ | Fiscal 2019 salaries for each named executive officer (“NEO”) increased from 2018 levels to reflect increases in competitive pay positioning levels | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| ∎ | Reviewed annually and adjusted when appropriate, based on scope of responsibility, performance, time in role, experience, and competitive market for executive talent | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Annual Incentive Bonuses (see page 29) | ∎ ∎ ∎ ∎ ∎ | Variable compensation paid in cash Based on performance againstpre-established financial, operational, strategic and individual performance measures Financial andnon-financial metrics provide a comprehensive assessment of executive performance Performance metrics evaluated annually for alignment with strategy and market trends NEO annual incentives determined through three-step performance measurement process:
Funding Allocation 1 Initial Funding Threshold Non-GAAP Adjusted EPS 2 Corporate Scorecard Business and Strategic Goals 3 Individual Performance Modifier Individual NEO Performance | ∎ ∎ ∎ ∎ | Fiscal 2019 target bonuses as a percentage of base salary were the same as fiscal 2018 levels for all the NEOs, except for Mr. Durn, whose target was increased to reflect competitive pay positioning level for annual incentive targets for CFOs The initial funding thresholdnon-GAAP adjusted EPS goal for fiscal 2019 was $2.90. The Company achieved an actual result of $3.04 As the initial funding threshold was achieved, the annual bonuses were based on the performance of the Company’s objective and quantifiable business and strategic goals in the corporate scorecard for each NEO Based on achievement compared to goals, fiscal 2019 actual annual bonuses ranged from 0.49x to 0.69x target for our NEOs — Achievement against the corporate scorecard ranged from 0.49x to 0.65x target (see corporate scorecard information on pages 32 and 33) — Based on an assessment of individual performance results and the impact against both quantitative and strategic objectives, each NEO, except for Mr. Durn, received an IPF of 1.0x. Mr. Durn received an IPF of 1.25x in recognition of his above and beyond performance in successfully managing external investor relationships and his vision and execution in driving major improvements in efficiency and effectiveness across the Finance organization (see individual performance highlights on page 34) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Long-Term Incentives (see page 35) | ∎ ∎ ∎ ∎ | Performance share units (“PSUs”) to establish rigorous long-term performance alignment Restricted stock units (“RSUs”) to provide link to shareholder value creation and retention value PSUs vest based on achievement of3-yearnon-GAAP adjusted operating margin and3-year Total Shareholder Return (“TSR”) measured against the S&P 500 PSUs vests at end of3-year performance period, based on achievement of performance goals; RSUs vest ratably over 3 years | ∎ ∎ ∎ | The target vehicle mix of the equity awards consists of 75% PSUs and 25% RSUs for the CEO and 50% PSUs and 50% RSUs for the other NEOs Non-GAAP adjusted operating margin is a key measure of our Company’s long-term success For fiscal 2019, the WFE market share metric applicable for fiscal 2018 PSUs was replaced with relative TSR, which better reflects our growing Display and Services businesses, in addition to our semiconductor segment, and incentivizes management to outperform the market through each business environment | ||||||||||||||||||||||
viii 2020 Proxy Statement
2020 PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY
Pay Mix
In fiscal 2017,2019, a significant portion of our executive compensation consisted of variable compensation and long-term incentives. As illustrated below, 93%92% of CEO compensation for fiscal 20172019 comprised variable compensation elements, and 75%84% of Mr. Dickerson’sCEO overall compensation was delivered in equity with multi-year vesting.
| ||
CEO | All Other NEOs | |
|
| |
84% Long-Term Incentives 92% Variable Compensation 76% Long-Term Incentives 87% Variable Compensation
1 Represents total direct compensation for FY2019
Summary of Fiscal 20172019 Total Direct Compensation
The following table summarizes elements of annual total direct compensation for our named executive officers (“NEOs”)NEOs for fiscal 2017,2019, consisting of (1) base salary, (2) annual incentive bonus and (3) annual long-term incentive awards (the grant date fair value of stock awards). This table excludes amounts not considered by the HRCC to be annual total direct compensation, that aresuch as certain other amounts required by the SEC to be reported in the Summary Compensation Table (see page 41 of this Proxy Statement).
| Name and Principal Position | Salary ($) | Annual Incentive Bonus ($) | Annual Long-Term Incentive Award ($) | Total ($) | ||||||||||||
Gary E. Dickerson | 1,000,000 | 2,640,000 | 10,844,501 | 14,484,501 | ||||||||||||
President and Chief Executive Officer | ||||||||||||||||
Daniel J. Durn(1) | 138,462 | — | 2,952,086 | 3,090,548 | ||||||||||||
Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer | ||||||||||||||||
Robert J. Halliday | 625,000 | 1,113,750 | 4,231,139 | 5,969,889 | ||||||||||||
Former Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer | ||||||||||||||||
Ali Salehpour | 591,346 | 1,060,290 | 3,868,486 | 5,520,122 | ||||||||||||
Senior Vice President, General Manager, Services, Display and Flexible Technologies | ||||||||||||||||
Omkaram Nalamasu | 484,808 | 770,770 | 2,176,031 | 3,431,609 | ||||||||||||
Senior Vice President and Chief Technology Officer | ||||||||||||||||
Thomas F. Larkins | 480,000 | 702,768 | 2,176,031 | 3,358,799 | ||||||||||||
Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary | ||||||||||||||||
vi 2018 Proxy Statement
75% Long-Term Incentives 93% Variable Compensation 68% Long-Term Incentives 88% Variable Compensation
2018 PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY
Key Fiscal 2017 Executive Compensation Highlights
Key compensation decisions for fiscal 2017 included:
Limited Salary Increases for Select NEOs.Two NEOs received modest salary increases from 2016 levels to reflect each officer’s responsibilities.
Annual Bonuses Reflect Strong Company Performance. The average annual bonus payouts to our NEOs was 134% of target bonus, reflecting our strong performance against fiscal 2017 objectives.
Adopted New Long-Term Incentive Program.In response to shareholder feedback as well as a broad review of our executive compensation program in fiscal 2016, the HRCC completed a comprehensive redesign of the long-term incentive program that was effective beginning with fiscal 2017 grants. Key redesign elements included:
Our new long-term incentive program equity mix establishes a more direct balance between rigorous, performance-based incentives and retention-based incentives, both of which the HRCC believes are critical components of our compensation program. Additionally, new performance measures(non-GAAP adjusted operating margin and wafer fabrication equipment (WFE) market share) consider both our absolute and relative performance, and align with our stated strategic priorities to ensure our management team’s long-term incentives match our long-term goals.
Summary of Changes to Long-Term Incentive Program
| ||||||||
|
| |||||||
| ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ||||||||
|
| |||||||
|
| |||||||
Stock Ownership Guidelines. In fiscal 2017, the HRCC approved changes to our stock ownership guidelines to increase the CEO ownership level from 5x to 6x of annual base salary and expanded the applicability of the guidelines (3x of annual base salary) to all Section 16 officers on the CEO Executive Staff.
| Name and Principal Position | Salary ($) | Annual ($) | Annual ($) | Total ($) | ||||||||||||
Gary E. Dickerson |
| 1,024,808 |
|
| 1,133,000 |
|
| 11,696,506 |
|
| 13,854,314 |
| ||||
President and Chief Executive Officer | ||||||||||||||||
Daniel J. Durn |
| 620,673 |
|
| 580,078 |
|
| 3,931,029 |
|
| 5,131,780 |
| ||||
Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer | ||||||||||||||||
Ali Salehpour |
| 620,673 |
|
| 411,750 |
|
| 3,931,029 |
|
| 4,963,452 |
| ||||
Senior Vice President, Services, Display and Flexible Technology | ||||||||||||||||
Prabu G. Raja |
| 564,058 |
|
| 430,948 |
|
| 2,892,132 |
|
| 3,887,138 |
| ||||
Senior Vice President, Semiconductor Products Group | ||||||||||||||||
Steve G. Ghanayem |
| 564,058 |
|
| 497,543 |
|
| 2,892,132 |
|
| 3,953,733 |
| ||||
Senior Vice President, New Markets and Alliances Group | ||||||||||||||||
Applied Materials, Inc. viiix
Alignment of Pay withand Performance
The following chart shows the alignment between total shareholder return (“TSR”) and the total direct compensation of our CEOHRCC approves aggressive performance goals for the last fiveCEO, as well as for the entire executive leadership team. As a result, despite outstanding TSR growth from fiscal years. While TSR has grown significantly over the last four years,2015 through 2019, our CEO’s total direct compensation has remained relativelyessentially flat during thatover the same period.
| (1) | Total direct compensation consists of annual base salary, |
| (2) | TSR line illustrates the total shareholder return on our common stock during the period from October |
viiix 20182020 Proxy Statement
20182020 PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY
Sustainability and Corporate CitizenshipSocial Responsibility
Our Approach
Applied is committed to growing itsour business in a sustainable and socially responsible manner,manner. We are focusing our resources and we demonstratecapabilities on addressing the sweeping technological challenges in the era of Artificial Intelligence and big data, and working with our customers to build a safer, more equitable and sustainable future. At the heart of Applied’s values is a commitment through our corporate citizenship programsto operate with responsibility and initiatives. We publish an annual Citizenship Report on our website to highlight our social responsibility accomplishments and provide key performance dataintegrity while making a positive contribution to our shareholders. industry and the world around us. To drive change and innovation, we are making investments to research and development, our operations, our supply chain and to our interactions with our local communities.
Sustainability is integratedand Corporate Social Responsibility Governance
Our Board and management oversee sustainability matters to foster accountability. We have established executive leadership of a company-wide strategy on environmental, social and governance (ESG) matters and reporting and focused on integrating sustainability into our operations and we have ancompany culture through initiatives aligned to company strategy that address a broad set of stakeholders, including customers, employees, suppliers, governments and our local communities.
Our Environmental, Health and Safety (“EHS”) organization that is focused ondedicated to maintaining a safe and healthyhealthful working environment, demonstrating environmental leadership, and meeting or exceeding regulatory compliance standards.compliance. The Head of EHS reports directly to the Board of Directors on a quarterly basis and provides a morein-depth environmental and sustainability update to the Audit Committee on an annual basis. We have a team fully dedicated to supporting our work in designing a culture of inclusion, and our HRCC oversees our corporate culture and human capital management programs, including our diversity and inclusion practices and initiatives. The HRCC approved ESG objectives for our annual bonus program to incentivize our leadership to improve employee safety, engagement and learning and development, to promote a culture of inclusion and to accelerate the representation of women and underrepresented minorities in our workforce. Further details and data on our sustainability and corporate social responsibility practices and accomplishments can be found in our annually published Corporate Social Responsibility Report.
We believe that investing in our people, in our communities, and in operating our business in a sustainable manner, investing in our people, and investing in our communities benefitssustainably will drive long-term value for Applied and its shareholders. These three pillars, as described below, provide the framework by which we manage our key initiatives:
Sustainability
| ● |
| ● |
People
| ● |
| ● |
Community
| ● |
| ● |
| ● | Encouraging employee involvement through charitable donations and volunteer programs |
Applied Materials, Inc. xi
Key Sustainability Initiatives
| Supply Chain | ||
●
● Commitment.Continue to build a culture of inclusion to accelerate progress towards meeting Company goals of increasing women’s representation globally and underrepresented minorities in our U.S. workforce. Promote the next generation of diverse technology leaders by supportingSTEM education programs ●Engagement.Integrate emphasis on diversity and | Sustainable supply chains are core to our success, and we actively seek to manage and promote global best practices.
● Industry Coalition. Member ofResponsible Business Alliance (formerly EICC)
● | |
| Environment | Ethics | |
We seek to operate and develop products in a way that minimizes environmental impact.
●
●
● | We maintain
● Human Rights. OurStandards of Business Conduct include
●
● Training and Business Ethics Helplines. Conduct numerous global training reinforcement programs and offer24/7 Business Ethics | |
Applied Materials, Inc. xiiix 2020 Proxy Statement
PROPOSAL 1—ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
PROXY STATEMENT
PROPOSAL 1—ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
Applied’s Board of Directors is elected each year at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders. Applied currently has 11 directors. Dennis D. Powell is retiring from the Board, and his service on our Board will end upon completion of his current term in March 2020. The Board has authorized a reduction in the size of the Board from 11 to ten directors.directors, effective upon the election of directors at the Annual Meeting. Upon the recommendation of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee, the Board has nominated the ten individuals listed below for election at the Annual Meeting, each of whom currently serves as a director of Applied. These nominees bring a wide variety of relevant skills, professional experience and backgrounds, as well as diverse viewpoints and perspectives to represent the long-term interests of shareholders, and to fulfill the leadership and oversight responsibilities of the Board.
If any nominee listed below becomes unable to stand for election at the Annual Meeting, the persons named as
proxies may vote for any person designated by the Board to replace the nominee. Alternatively, the proxies may vote for the remaining nominees and leave a vacancy that the Board may fill later, or the Board may reduce the authorized number of directors. As of the date of this Proxy Statement, the Board is not aware of any nominee who is unable or will decline to serve as a director.
Each director elected at the Annual Meeting will serve until Applied’s 20192021 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and until he or she is succeeded by another qualified director who has been elected, or, if earlier, until his or her death, resignation or removal.
✓ | THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTEFOR EACH OF THE FOLLOWING DIRECTOR NOMINEES
| |
  | Judy Bruner
Executive Vice President, Administration and Chief Financial Officer, SanDisk Corporation (retired) | Independent Director
Director since 2016
Age
Board Committees: ●Corporate Governanceand Nominating(Chair) ●Audit
Other Current Public Boards: ●Rapid7, Inc. ●Seagate Technology plc ●Varian Medical Systems, Inc.
Key Qualifications and Expertise:
● Executive leadership and management experience
● Semiconductor industry leadership ●Accounting principles, financial controls, financial reporting rules and regulations, and audit procedures
● Global business, industry, finance, information technology and operational experience
● Risk management and controls
● Strategy and innovation ●Public company board experience | ||||||||
Judy Bruner served as Executive Vice President, Administration and Chief Financial Officer of SanDisk | ||||||||||
Corporation, a supplier of flash storage products, from June 2004 until its acquisition by Western Digital in May 2016. Previously, she was Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Palm, Inc., a provider of handheld computing and communications solutions, from September 1999 until June 2004. Prior to Palm, Inc., Ms. Bruner held financial management positions at 3Com Corporation, Ridge Computers and Hewlett-Packard Company. She currently serves as a member of the boards of directors of Rapid7, Inc., Seagate Technology plc and Varian Medical Systems, Inc. Ms. Bruner | ||||||||||
Applied Materials, Inc. 1
  | Xun (Eric) Chen
SB Investments Advisers (US), Inc. | Independent Director
Director since 2015
Age
Board Committees: ●Human Resources and Compensation
Key Qualifications and Expertise:
● Executive leadership and management experience
● Semiconductor industry leadership
● Global business, industry and operational experience in the technology and information sector
● Mergers and acquisitions, capital markets
● Strategy and innovation ●Public company board experience | ||||||
Eric Chen is a Managing Partner of SB Investment Advisers (US), Inc. (“SBIA”), an investment adviser | ||||||||
focused on investments in the technology sector, since March 2018. Prior to joining SBIA, Dr. Chen was the Chief Executive Officer andCo-Founder of BaseBit Technologies, Inc., a technology company in | ||||||||
Silicon Valley.
| ||||||||
  | Aart J. de Geus
Chairman andCo-Chief Executive Officer, Synopsys, Inc. | Independent Director
Director since 2007
Age
Board Committees: ●Strategy (Chair) ●Investment
Other Current Public Boards: ●Synopsys, Inc.
Key Qualifications and Expertise:
● Executive leadership and global management experience
● Semiconductor industry leadership
● Innovation, management development and understanding of global challenges and opportunities
● Navigating a company fromstart-up through various stages of growth
● Mergers and acquisitions
● Cybersecurity ● Risk management and controls ●Public company board | ||||||
Aart J. de Geus is aco-founder of Synopsys, Inc., a provider of electronic design automation software and | ||||||||
related services for semiconductor design companies, and currently serves as its Chairman of the Board of Directors andCo-Chief Executive Officer. Since 1986, Dr. de Geus has held various positions at Synopsys, including President, Senior Vice President of Engineering and Senior Vice President of Marketing, and has served as a member of its board of directors. From 1982 to 1986, Dr. de Geus was employed by the General Electric Company, a global | ||||||||
2 20182020 Proxy Statement
PROPOSAL 1—ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
 | Gary E. Dickerson
President and Chief Executive Officer, Applied Materials, Inc. | Director since 2013
Age
Key Qualifications and Expertise:
● Executive leadership and management experience
● Semiconductor industry leadership
● Global business, industry and operational experience
● Extensive engineering and technological leadership
● Understanding of complex industry and global challenges
● Expertise in driving strategy, innovation and product development | ||||||
Gary E. Dickerson has been Chief Executive Officer and a member of the Board of Directors of Applied | ||||||||
| since Mr. Dickerson was named President of Applied in June 2012, | ||||||||
| ||||||||
  | Stephen R. Forrest
Professor of Electrical Engineering & Computer Science, Physics, and Materials Science & Engineering, University of Michigan | Independent Director
Director since 2008
Age
Board Committees: ●Audit
Key Qualifications and Expertise:
● Semiconductor,
● Research and development portfolio management
● Government policy
●
● Establishing partnerships to develop businesses in new markets focused on alternative energy and other technologies | ||||||
Stephen R. Forrest holds faculty appointments as | ||||||||
Professor of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, as Professor of Physics, and as Professor of Materials Science and Engineering at the University of Michigan, and leads the University’s Optoelectronics Components and Materials Group. Dr. Forrest also has been the lead editor of Physical Review Applied, a scientific journal covering engineering, physics and technologies, since June 2017. From January 2006 to December 2013, | Dr. Forrest has participated in the founding of five companies commercializing fiber optic components, displays, lighting and solar cells. | |||||||
Applied Materials, Inc. 3
  | Thomas J. Iannotti
Senior Vice President and General Manager, Enterprise Services, Hewlett-Packard Company (retired) | Chairman of the Board
Independent Director
Director since 2005
Age
Board Committees: ●Human Resources and Compensation (Chair)
Other Current Public Boards: ●Atento S.A.
Key Qualifications and Expertise:
● Service management for technology companies on a global, regional and country level
● Senior leadership and management experience
● Global business, industry and operational experience
● International strategic and business development
● Public company board experience | ||||||
Thomas J. Iannotti served as Senior Vice President | ||||||||
and General Manager, Enterprise Services, for Hewlett-Packard Company, a technology solutions provider to consumers, businesses and institutions globally, from February 2009 until his retirement in October 2011. From 2002 to January 2009, Mr. Iannotti held various executive positions at Hewlett-Packard, including Senior Vice President and Managing Director, Enterprise Business Group, Americas. From 1978 to 2002, Mr. Iannotti worked at Digital Equipment Corporation, a vendor of computer systems and software, and at Compaq Computer Corporation, a supplier of personal computing systems, after its acquisition of Digital Equipment Corporation. Mr. Iannotti currently serves as | ||||||||
  | Alexander A. Karsner
| Independent Director
Director since 2008
Age
Board ●Human Resources and Compensation ●Corporate Governance and Nominating
Key Qualifications and Expertise:
● Expertise in public policy and government relations
● Domestic and international trade, development and investment markets
● Cybersecurity ● Environment and sustainability, including renewable energy policy, technologies and commercialization ●Entrepreneurial leadership
●
● Public company board experience | ||||||
Alexander A. Karsner | ||||||||
| market transformation through nature-based solutions. Mr. Karsner most recently served as Managing Partner of Emerson Collective, an investment platform fundingnon-profit, philanthropic andfor-profit portfolios advancing | ||||||||
education, immigration, the environment and other social | 2014, as well as Argonne National Laboratory, and was previously an Associate of the Harvard Kennedy School. He presently is on the board of Conservation International and director emeritus of the National Marine Sanctuaries Foundation. He is a Life Member of the Council of Foreign Relations and the Trilateral Commission, Distinguished Fellow of the Council on Competitiveness and a Henry Crown Fellow of the Aspen Institute. | |||||||
4 20182020 Proxy Statement
PROPOSAL 1—ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
  | Adrianna C. Ma
Managing Partner, | Independent Director
Director since 2015
Age
Board Committees: ●Investment (Chair) ●Audit ●Corporate Governance and Nominating
Key Qualifications and Expertise:
● Broad experience with technology companies
● Expertise in global growth investment
● Financial and accounting expertise
● Mergers and acquisitions, capital markets
● Board experience with technology-enabled growth companies | ||||||
Adrianna C. Ma has | ||||||||
| she was a Managing Partner at the Fremont Group, a private investment company | ||||||||
of funds, including its investment strategy, asset allocation, manager selection and risk management. From 2005 to April 2015, Ms. Ma served as a Managing Director at General Atlantic LLC, a global growth equity firm, where she invested in and served on the boards of directors of technology-enabled growth companies around the world. Prior to joining General Atlantic, Ms. Ma worked at Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated as an investment banker in the Mergers, Acquisitions and Restructuring Department. Ms. Ma previously served as a member of the board of directors of Jagged Peak Energy Inc. from 2019 to 2020 and C&J Energy Services, Inc. from 2013 to 2015. | ||||||||
| Yvonne McGill Chief Financial Officer, Senior Vice President, Infrastructure Solutions Group and Global Financial Planning and Analysis Dell Technologies, Inc. | Independent Director Director since 2019 Age 52 Board Committees: ● Audit Key Qualifications and Expertise: ● Executive leadership and management experience ● Accounting principles, financial controls, financial reporting rules and regulations, and audit procedures ● Global business, industry and operational experience in the technology sector | ||||||
Yvonne McGill has been Chief Financial Officer and | ||||||||
| Senior Vice President, Infrastructure Solutions Group since March 2018 and Senior Vice President, Global Financial Planning and Analysis since August 2015 at Dell Technologies, Inc., a leading global end-to-end technology provider, with a comprehensive portfolio of IT hardware, software and service solutions spanning both traditional infrastructure and emerging, multi-cloud technologies. Ms. McGill served in various other finance leadership roles since joining Dell in 1997. Prior to Dell, Ms. McGill worked at ManTech International Corporation and Price Waterhouse. She is a Certified Public Accountant (inactive). Ms. McGill also currently serves on the Susan G. Komen Greater and Central Texas Foundation Board. | ||||||||
Applied Materials, Inc. 5
| Scott A. McGregor
President and Chief Executive Officer, Broadcom Corporation (retired) | Independent Director
Director since 2018
Age Board Committees: ● Audit ● Strategy
Other Current Public Boards: ●Equifax Inc. (since October 2017)
Key Qualifications and Expertise:
● Executive leadership and management experience
● Semiconductor industry leadership
● Global business, industry and operational experience
●
● Cybersecurity ●Public company | ||||
Scott A. McGregor served as President and Chief | ||||||
| Executive Officer and as a member of the board of directors of | ||||||
Broadcom Corporation, a world leader in wireless connectivity, broadband, automotive and networking infrastructure, from 2005 until the company was acquired by Avago Technologies Limited in February 2016. Mr. McGregor joined Broadcom from Philips Semiconductors (now NXP Semiconductors), where he was President and Chief Executive Officer. He previously served in a range of senior management positions at Santa Cruz Operation Inc., Digital Equipment Corporation (now part of HP), Xerox PARC and Microsoft, where he was the architect and development team leader for Windows 1.0. Mr. McGregor currently serves as a member of the board of directors of Equifax Inc., and Luminar Technologies. He previously served as a member of the boards of directors of Ingram Micro Inc., TSMC, and Xactly Corporation. | ||||||
Applied Materials, Inc. 5
 |
|
| ||||||
| ||||||||
| ||||||||
Chairman Emeritus
Chairman Emeritus
James C. Morgan became Chairman Emeritus in March 2009, following his retirement as our director and Chairman of the Board. Mr. Morgan spent more than 31 years as a director and employee of Applied, including over 20 years as
Chairman of the Board.
Mr. Morgan first joined Applied in 1976 and served as Chief Executive Officer from 1977 to 2003. As Chairman Emeritus, Mr. Morgan does not attend any Board or Committee meetings, has no voting rights and receives no retainer or meeting fees.
6 20182020 Proxy Statement
BOARD AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE PRACTICES
BOARD AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE PRACTICES
Board Composition and Nominee Considerations
Our director nominees have a wide variety of relevant skills, professional experience and backgrounds, and collectively bring to our Board diverse viewpoints and perspectives that
strengthen its ability to represent the long-term interests of shareholders. The chart below illustrates broad categories of skills and expertise that our director nominees offer that we believe contribute to the effective leadership and exercise of oversight responsibilities by the Board.
 |
|
Diversity. Because Our Board values having a Board that reflects diverse backgrounds, experiencesperspectives, including those based on gender, ethnicity, skills, experience at policy-making levels in areas that are relevant to the Company’s global activities, and perspectives foster thoughtful and robust discussion and decision-making,functional, geographic or cultural backgrounds. In 2019 the Board adopted a Policy on Board Diversity within our Corporate Governance Guidelines, which reflects the Board’s commitment to actively seek out women and Nominating Committee (the “Governance Committee”) and the Board place great value on a diversity of background, skills and viewpoints, gender and ethnicity among the directors when considering potentialethnically diverse director candidates and nominees. Amongto consider the factors above, among others, in the Governance Committee considers incontext of the current composition of the Board and needs of the Company when identifying and evaluating director candidates.
The 10 director nominees for election at our 2020 Annual Meeting bring to our Board a potential director is the extent to which the candidate would addvariety of different backgrounds, skills, professional and industry experience and other attributes and perspectives that contribute to the overall diversity of theour Board.
Independence. The Governance Committee also expects eachnon-employee director to be free of relationships, interests or affiliations that could give rise to conflicts of interest or interfere with the director’s exercise of independent judgment. Applied’s Corporate Governance Guidelines require that a majority of our directors must be independent, and that our
Audit, Human Resources and Compensation, and Corporate Governance and Nominating Committees must consist solely of independent directors.
Director independence is determined under Nasdaq listing standards and SEC rules. The Board has affirmatively
determined that all members of the Board who served during 20172019 and all director nominees, other than Mr. Dickerson, our Chief Executive Officer, are independent under applicable Nasdaq listing standards and SEC rules.
Tenure. The Board believes that new ideas and perspectives are critical to a forward-looking and strategic Board, as are the valuable experienceexperiences and deep understanding of Applied’s business and industries that longer-serving directors offer. Our Governance Guidelines do not impose a tenureterm limit on Board service,service; our directors are not typically nominated forre-election after they reach the age of 70. Feedback from the annual Board evaluations and individual discussions between eachnon-employee director and our Chairman is an important determinant of Board tenure. Our ongoing Board refreshment has added two new directors to the Board over the last two years and has resulted in a balanced range of tenures which ensures both continuity and fresh perspectives among our director nominees.
Although our directors are not typically nominated forre-election after they reach the age of 70, after due consideration, the Board waived this policy with respect to Mr. Powell based on its determination that it would be beneficial to have Mr. Powell continue to serve as director due to his financial and accounting expertise, his deep knowledge of the Company, and his leadership role as Chair of the Audit Committee.
Applied Materials, Inc. 7
Our nominees have an average tenure of 67 years, which is lower than the average tenure of other S&P 500 companies, and fourthree of our nominees have been members of the Board for four years or less.
Regular refreshment resulting in average director tenure of | 
|
Board Composition and Refreshment
Identification of New Director Candidates.Identifying and recommending individuals for nomination and election to our Board is a principal responsibility of our Governance Committee, which carries outperforms this function through an ongoing, year-round process.
The Governance Committee regularly considers the size and composition of the Board and assesses whether the composition appropriately aligns with the Company’s evolving business and strategic needs. The focus is on ensuring that the Board is composed of directors who possess a wide variety of relevant skills, professional experience and backgrounds, bring diverse viewpoints and perspectives, and effectively represent the long-term interests of shareholders.
In its consideration of potential director candidates, the Governance Committee reviews the short- and long-term strategies and interests of the Company to determine what current and future skills and experienceexperiences are required of the Board in exercising its oversight function. Specific search criteria evolve over time to reflect the Company’s dynamic business and strategic needs and the changing composition of the Board, and may focus oninclude such factors as:
| ● | Operating experience or thought leadership in key markets, industries, technologies or business models that are aligned with the Company’s strategic growth plans; |
| ● | Business or cultural background in regions where the |
| ● | Senior executive leadership and management experience; and |
| ● | Subject matter expertise in such areas as corporate finance and financial reporting, governance, compensation, risk management and marketing. |
In accordance with the Policy on Board Diversity, the Governance Committee actively seeks out women and ethnically diverse director candidates.
The Governance Committee also considers succession planning in light of anticipated retirements, and for Board and Committee Chair roles, to maintain relevant expertise and depth of experience.
In addition, all director candidates are also expected to possess or demonstrate:
| ● | Sound judgment, analytical and inquisitive perspective, and practical wisdom; |
| ● | Strategic mindset and engaged and collaborative approach; |
| ● | Independence, personal and professional ethics, integrity and values; and |
| ● | Commitment to representing the long-term interests of Applied’s shareholders. |
The Governance Committee may retain a search firm to assist in identifying and evaluating new candidates for director nominees and may also consider referrals from directors, shareholders or other sources. Mr. McGregor,Ms. McGill, who joined our Board in January 2018,July 2019, was identified and vetted as a potential candidate by a third-party search firm for consideration by the Governance Committee. The Governance Committee evaluates and interviews potential Board candidates and makes appointment recommendations to the full Board. All members of the Board may interview candidates.
Recent Board Refreshment. As a result of the foregoing process, the Board has added fourtwo new directors over the last three years. The appointmentstwo years, each of Dr. Chen and Ms. Ma in 2015, Ms. Bruner in 2016, and Mr. McGregor in 2018whom have brought valuable and diverse backgrounds and perspectives to the overall composition of the Board:Board. The most recent appointment was Ms. McGill in July 2019. Ms. McGill is a segment chief financial officer for Dell Technologies, Inc. who brings to our Board executive leadership and management experience, as well as global business, industry and operational experience in the technology sector. Her financial and accounting background provides key experience and expertise to the Board, as Mr. Dennis Powell, Chair of the Audit Committee, prepares to retire upon completion of his current term in March 2020.
8 20182020 Proxy Statement
BOARD AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE PRACTICES
Regular Review of Board Composition that
Drives Refreshment
1 Assess Develop a search profile of relevant skills, background and experience sought in new directors 2 Identify Information provided to third-party search firms Potential candidates identified by independent directors, shareholders, independent search firm, our people 3 Evaluate Governance Committee screens candidates for qualifications, skills, diversity, independence and potential conflicts Candidates meet with directors 4 Recommend Governance Committee recommends selected candidates to the Board Results Two new directors over the last two years
Re-nomination of Directors for Election at Annual Meeting. In considering whether to recommendre-nomination of a director for election at our Annual Meeting, the Governance Committee considers factors such as:
| ● | The extent to which the director’s skills, qualifications and experience continue to contribute to the success of our |
| ● | Feedback from the annual Board evaluations and individual discussions between eachnon-employee director and our Chairman; |
| ● | Attendance and participation at, and preparation for, Board and Committee meetings; |
| ● | Shareholder feedback, including the support received by director nominees elected at our |
| ● | Outside board and other affiliations, including any actual or perceived conflicts of interest; and |
| ● |
Based on the Governance Committee’s recommendation, the Board selects director nominees and recommends them for election by Applied’s shareholders.
Shareholder Recommendations or Nominations. The evaluation procedures described above apply to all candidates for director nomination, including candidates submitted by shareholders. Shareholders wishing to recommend a candidate for consideration by the Governance Committee should submit the candidate’s name, biographical data and a description of his or her qualifications in light of the criteria listed above to Thomas F. Larkins,Christina Y. Lai, Corporate Secretary, Applied Materials, Inc., 3225 Oakmead Village Drive, M/S 1241,1268, P.O. Box 58039, Santa Clara, CA 95052, or bye-mail at corporatesecretary@amat.com.
Shareholders wishing to nominate a director should follow the specific procedures set forth in our Bylaws.
Corporate Governance Guidelines
Applied’s Corporate Governance Guidelines establish the governance framework within which the Board conducts its business and fulfills its responsibilities. These guidelines and
other important governance materials are available on our website at:http://www.appliedmaterials.com/company/
investor-relations/governance-documents.
Applied Materials, Inc. 9
The Board regularly reviews our Corporate Governance Guidelines in light of legal and regulatory requirements, evolving best practices and other developments. In December 2019, the Board formalized its focus on diversity by adopting a Policy on Board Diversity within our Corporate Governance Guidelines as described above on page 7 under “Diversity.”
Applied Materials, Inc. 9
Our corporate governance framework provides the Board flexibility to determine the appropriate leadership structure for the Company, and whether the roles of Chairman and CEO should be separated or combined. In making this determination, the Board considers many factors, including the needs of the business, the Board’s assessment of its leadership needs from time to time and the best interests of shareholders. If the role of Chairman is filled by a director who does not qualify as an independent director, the Board will designate a Lead Independent Director.
The Board believes that it is currently appropriate to separate the roles of Chairman and CEO. The CEO is responsible for setting our strategic direction and theday-to-day leadership of our business, while the Chairman, along with the rest of our independent directors, ensures that the Board’s time and attention are focused on effective oversight of the matters most critical to Applied. Mr. Iannotti, an independent director, currently serves as the Chairman of the Board. Mr. Iannotti has significant experience and knowledge of Applied, working with two CEOs and different management teams at Applied, and the Board believes that his deep knowledge of the companyCompany and
industry, as well as his strong leadership and governance experience, enable him to lead the Board effectively and independently.
Director Onboarding and Education
When new directors join the Board, they participate in a comprehensive onboarding program to learn about our industry, business, strategies and policies. Themulti-day onboarding program includes meetings with senior executives to discuss our businesses, strategy, operations and our corporate functions such as finance, technology, information systems and legal, and a tour of the Maydan Technology Center, ourstate-of-the-art R&D facilities. New directors also meet with the executives and staff supporting the Committees on which they sit, as well as the Committees’ external consultants and advisors. Each new director is also partnered with an experienced fellow director “mentor” to facilitate the integration of the new director to the Board.
For continued education regarding our business and industry, we provide presentations by internal and external experts during Board meetings on topics such as technology inflections, industry trends, changes in the geopolitical and macroeconomic landscape, and the ESG landscape, with particular focus on the implications and impact to the
Company. Our Board and Committees also regularly review developments in corporate governance to continue enhancing the Board’s effectiveness. We encourage directors to participate in external continuing director education programs and provide reimbursement for expenses associated with this participation. Throughout the year, Board members also attend Company events, including Analyst Day, our Engineering and Technology (ET) Conference, and Diversity Day. In addition, in 2019, the Board held Board and Committee meetings at our offices in Taiwan, where directors attended the grand opening of our new Display Equipment Manufacturing Center and R&D Laboratory, participated in a local employeeall-hands meeting and met with our regional executives. These interactions, along with meetings with leaders below the CEO Executive Staff level throughout the year, give directors additional visibility to provide oversight of the Company’s culture, strategies and operations.
Board and Committee Evaluations
Our Board recognizes that a thorough, constructive evaluation process enhances our Board’s effectiveness and is an essential element of good corporate governance. EveryEach year, the Governance Committee, overseesin consultation with our independent Board Chairman, reviews and determines the design, scope, content and execution of the evaluation process, which involveincluding whether to engage a third party to facilitate the evaluation.
The evaluation process consists of assessments of the Board, each standing committee of the Board, and individual directors. Written questionnaires solicit feedback on a range of issues, including Board and Committee structure and composition; meeting process and dynamics; execution of key responsibilities; interaction with management; and information and resources.
Following completion of the written questionnaires, aggregated results, including all written comments, together with data analyzing results compared to the prior year, are provided to the Chairman, who meets with each director individually to discuss additional input on these topics and to provide individual feedback. Committee chairs lead a discussion of evaluation results for their respective Committees, and a summary of Board and Committee evaluation results is discussed with the full Board, including suggestions for updating policies and practices per evaluation results. Director suggestions for improvements to the evaluation questionnaires and process are considered for incorporation for the following year.
2017 Board Evaluation Process
10 20182020 Proxy Statement
BOARD AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE PRACTICES
2019 Board Evaluation Process
Questionnaire Evaluation questionnaire provides director feedback on an unattributed basis One-on-One Discussions Candid, one-on-one discussions between the Chairman and each director to solicit additional feedback and provide individual feedback Board Report Board and Committee evaluation results provided to the full Board Closed Session Closed session discussion of Board and Committee evaluations led by our Chairman and independent Committee chairs Policies and practices are updated as appropriate per evaluation results and discussions
Board’s Role in Risk Oversight
One of the Board’s most important functions is overseeing risk management for the Company. Applied’s risk oversight framework illustrated below shows the close interaction between the full Board, individual committees and senior management.
The Board The Board has the ultimate responsibility for, and is actively engaged in, oversight of the Companys risk management, in some cases directly by the full Board, and in some cases through delegation of certain types of risks to the oversight of the appropriate Board Committee. The full Board oversees risks and opportunities associated with ESG matters. COMMITTEES Audit Oversees the enterprise risk management program, as well as risks related to financial, regulatory, compliance, cybersecurity and environmental, health and safety matters, and regularly reviews with management, the head of internal audit and the independent accountants the steps taken to monitor and mitigate risk exposures Governance Oversees the management of risks related to corporate governance matters, including director independence, Board composition and succession, shareholder communications, and overall Board effectiveness HR & Compensation Oversees risks associated with Applieds compensation policies, plans and practices, organizational talent and culture, management succession, and human capital management, including the corporate culture, and diversity and inclusion programs and initiatives Management Applieds management has day-to-day responsibility for: Identifying risks and assessing them in relation to Company strategies and objectives; Implementing suitable risk mitigation plans, processes and controls; and Appropriately managing risks in a manner that serves the best interests of Applied, its shareholders and other stakeholders. Management regularly reports to the Board on its risk assessments and risk mitigation strategies for the major risks of our business. Senior management and other employees also report to the Board and its committees from time to time on risk-related issues.
Applied has implemented an enterprise risk management (“ERM”) program, overseen by the Audit Committee, which provides an enterprise-wide perspective on Applied’s risks. The risks identified are reported to the Board, with a focus on the most significant risks facing the Company, including strategic,
operational, financial, and legal and compliance risks. Oversight responsibility for a particular risk may fall within an area of responsibility and expertise of one of the Board Committees. Management reviews the ERM program activities regularly with the Audit Committee, presents an analysis of risk mitigation
Applied Materials, Inc. 11
strategies to the Board or the respective Committee with oversight responsibility for the risk, and provides annual risk mitigation updates to the full Board.
Risk Assessment of Compensation Programs. We have assessed our compensation policies, plans and practices, and determined that they do not create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on Applied. To make this determination, our management reviewed our compensation policies, plans and practices, and assessed the following aspects: design, payment methodology, potential payment volatility, relationship to our financial results, length of performance period, risk-mitigating features, performance measures and goals, oversight and controls, and plan features and values compared to market practices. Management reviewed its analysis with the Human Resources and Compensation Committee, which agreed with this determination. Applied also has in place various controls to mitigate risks relating to compensation policies, plans and practices, such as executive stock ownership guidelines and a clawback policy that enables the recovery of certain incentive compensation payments in certain circumstances.
Management Succession Planning
The Board has delegated to the Human Resources and Compensation Committee (“HRCC”) primary responsibility for overseeing management succession planning and executive organizational development, as well as human capital management programs. Management updates the HRCC on programs and developments every quarter and reports to the full Board at least annually.
The HRCC reviews and advises on management’s succession and development programs for the CEO and other senior executives, with an eye toward ensuring development of the talent needed to lead Applied today and in the future and readiness of succession candidates who can assume top management positions without undue interruption. Board members have opportunities throughout the year to engage with members of senior management and other high-potential leaders in a variety of formal and informal settings, including Board meetings and events, preparatory meetings, analyst meetings and internal and external business and technology conferences.
The HRCC and Board also regularly discuss matters related to organizational health and discuss individual executive transitions as the need arises over the course of the year. The Board’s goal is to have a long-term and continuing process for effective senior leadership development and succession and to ensure that there are ready choices available when the time is right. The HRCC also receives quarterly reports from the Group Vice President of Human Resources, covering a range of topics relating to corporate culture and human capital management, including the
Company’s diversity and inclusion practices and initiatives and its sexual harassment policies.
In addition to direct engagement through our recurring shareholder engagement program discussed below, Applied has instituted a number of mechanisms that allow shareholders to advance their points of view, including:
Right to Call a Special Meeting.Our Bylaws permit shareholders holding at least 20% of our outstanding shares of common stock to call a special meeting.
Proxy Access.Our Bylaws permit proxy access. Any shareholder (or group of up to 20 shareholders) owning 3% or more of Applied’s common stock continuously for at least three years may nominate up to two individuals or 20% of our Board, whichever is greater, as director candidates for election to the Board, and require us to include such nominees in our annual meeting proxy statement if the shareholders and nominees satisfy the requirements contained in our Bylaws.
Majority Voting.Under our Bylaws, in any uncontested election of directors (an election in which the number of nominees does not exceed the number of directors to be elected), any nominee who receives a greater number of votes cast “for” his or her election than votes cast “against” his or her election will be elected.
Our Bylaws provide that in the event an incumbent director receives more “against” than “for” votes, he or she shall tender his or her resignation after certification of the shareholder vote. Our Governance Committee, composed entirely of independent directors, will consider the offer of resignation, taking into consideration all factors it deems relevant, and recommend to the Board the action to be taken. The Board must take action on the recommendation within 90 days following certification of the shareholder vote. No director who tenders an offer of resignation may participate in the vote on the Governance Committee’s recommendation or the Board’s determination of whether to accept the resignation offer. Applied will publicly disclose the Board’s decision, including, if applicable, the reasons for rejecting an offer to resign.
Board’s Role in Risk Oversight
Applied’s management hasday-to-day responsibility for identifying risks and assessing them in relationRight to Company strategies and objectives; implementing suitable risk mitigation plans, processes and controls; and appropriately managing risks in a manner that servesAct by Written Consent. Currently our Certificate of Incorporation prohibits shareholder action by written consent. However, after consideration of the best interestsresults of Applied, its shareholders and other stakeholders.
Applied has implemented an enterprise risk management program (“ERM”), overseenlast year’s shareholder proposal on shareholder action by the Audit Committee, for the purpose of providing an enterprise-wide perspective on Applied’s risks. The risks identified are reported to the Board, which has oversight for risk management, with a focus on the most significant risks facing the Company, including strategic, operational, financial, and legal and compliance risks. The Board in turn delegates oversight responsibility for specific
risks to the respective Board Committees in whose area of responsibility and expertise the risks fall. Management reviews the ERM program activities regularly with the Audit Committeewritten consent and the Board.
Throughout the year, the Boardshareholder feedback we received, we are submitting to shareholders for approval an amendment and the Committees reviewrestatement of our Certificate of Incorporation to allow shareholder action by written consent. See “Proposal 4—Approval of an Amendment and discuss specific risk topics in greater detail.
Risk AssessmentRestatement of Compensation Programs. We have assessed our compensation policies, plans and practices, and determined that they do not create risks that are reasonably likelyCertificate of Incorporation to have a material adverse effectAllow Shareholders to Act by Written Consent” on Applied. To make this determination, our management reviewed our compensation policies, plans and practices, and assessed the following aspects: design, payment methodology, potential payment volatility, relationship to our financial results, length of performance period, risk-mitigating features, performance measures and goals, oversight and controls, and plan features and values compared to market practices. Management reviewed its analysis with the Human Resources and Compensation Committee, which agreed with this determination. Applied also has in place various controls to mitigate risks relating to compensation policies, plans and practices, such as executive stock ownership guidelines and a clawback policy that enables the recovery of certain incentive compensation payments in certain circumstances.
Management Succession Planning
The Board has delegated to the Human Resources and Compensation Committee (“HRCC”) primary responsibilitypage 50 for management succession planning and executive organizational development. The HRCC reviews and advises on management’s succession and development programs for the CEO and other senior executives, with an eye toward ensuring readiness of succession candidates who can assume top management positions without undue interruption. Board members have opportunities throughout the year to engage with members of senior management in a variety of settings, including Board meetings and events, preparatory meetings, analyst meetings and internal and external business andadditional information.
Applied Materials, Inc. 1211 2020 Proxy Statement
BOARD AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE PRACTICES
technology conferences. The HRCC and Board also regularly discuss matters related to organizational health and discuss individual executive transitions as the need arises over the course of the year. The Board’s goal is to have a long-term and continuing process for effective senior leadership development and succession and to ensure that there are ready choices available when the time is right.
We believe that strong corporate governance should include regular engagement with our shareholders to enable us to understand and respond to shareholder concerns.
Investor Relations.Our senior management team, including our CEO, CFO and members of our Investor Relations team, maintain regular contact with a broad base of investors, including through quarterly earnings calls, an annual analyst day event, individual meetings and other channels for communication, to understand their concerns. In 2017,2019, senior management participated in over 400
286 meetings with investors, including more than 200121 meetings with the CFO and more than 4024 with our CEO.
Shareholder Outreach Program.In addition, we have a robust shareholder outreach program, developed over the last several years, that focuses on compensation and governance issues of interest to our shareholders. The outreachwhich is a recurring, year-round effort, led by a cross-functional team that includes members of our Investor Relations, Global Rewards, Culture of Inclusion, Environmental, Health & Safety and Legal departments, whichfunctions, with participation of our independent directors, where appropriate. This engagement enables us to build meaningful relationships and trust over time with our shareholders. In
MARCH - MAY Annual Meeting Based on the fall, weresults of our 2019 annual meeting, the Board and management developed a plan to solicit feedback on our executive compensation program, corporate governance and disclosure practices, and sustainability and corporate citizenship initiatives, as well as any matters votedwritten consent DECEMBER - FEBRUARY Board Deliberations Based on at our prior annual meeting. After the filing of ourFeedback Continued to meet with shareholders, enhanced proxy statement we engage againand annual report content based on feedback, and responded to shareholder concerns JUNE - AUGUST Action by Written Consent Focused Engagement Conducted extensive written consent engagement outreach. We reached out to holders of 57% of outstanding shares and engaged with our shareholders about important topics46% specifically on written consent SEPTEMBER - NOVEMBER General Off-Season Engagement Conducted general off-season engagement outreach. We reached out to be addressed at our annual meeting. Following our annual meeting, we review the resultsholders of the meeting62% of outstanding shares and investor input, as well as evaluate emerging trends in corporateengaged with 20% of holders on governance, compensation, and other areas. We share input we receive from our shareholders with our Human Resources and Compensation Committee, our Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee, and our Board on an ongoing basis throughout the year.sustainability
Key Themes Discussed with Shareholders in 2019 | ||||
| Corporate Governance | ● | Governance structure, including current shareholder rights, and desirability of action by written consent | ||
| ● | Input regarding potential adoption of action by written consent, market practice provisions in our corporate charter and bylaws and industry trends | |||
Board Refreshment and Composition | ● | Applied’s commitment to Board diversity, including gender, race/ethnicity and age | ||
| ● | Thoughtful Board processes for refreshment, succession planning and director orientation and education | |||
| Risk Oversight | ● | Framework for the Board’s oversight of risk, particularly around human capital management, culture and sustainability | ||
| Executive Compensation | ● | Compensation program, metrics, and link between pay and performance | ||
| Sustainability | ● | Shareholders’ particular ESG focus areas and Applied’s strategy, initiatives and Board oversight related to ESG matters | ||
| ● | Alignment of sustainability initiatives with corporate strategy; Applied’s commitment to diversity and inclusion | |||
During 2017, we engaged
We engage with a significant cross-section of our shareholder base, including large institutional investors, pension funds, and other investors. We reached out to holdersTopics of over 50% of our outstanding shares and spent a significant amount of time discussingdiscussion include key business, Board, governance, executive compensation, environmental, sustainability and sustainabilitydiversity and inclusion matters, as well as other topicssubjects of interest to our shareholders. Based on feedback from shareholders, we
We have soughtover the last few years adopted proxy access and considered shareholder feedback in recent years as we havea special meeting right and implemented changes to our executive compensation program design and certain of our corporate governance practices.
ExecutiveCompensation.programs. During the fall of 2016,2019, we conducted extensive shareholder outreach efforts as part of a broad review of our executive compensation program and in response to shareholder input at the time of our 2016 Annual Meeting. We contacted the holders of approximately 43%62% of
12 2018 Proxy Statement
BOARD AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE PRACTICES
our outstanding shares, and engaged in active discussions on these topics with holdersinvestors who requested meetings, representing 25%approximately 20% of our shares outstanding.
As a result of this program review and shareholder outreach, the Human Resources and Compensation Committee made several changes
Applied Materials, Inc. 13
Responsiveness to2019 Shareholder Action by Written Consent Proposal. In response to the annual bonus program effective beginning in fiscal 2016,high level of shareholder support at the 2019 Annual Meeting for the proposal on shareholder action by written consent, and completed a comprehensive redesignat the direction of the long-term incentive program effective beginning in fiscal 2017. These changes enhanced alignment with Applied’s strategic priorities and directly reflected the input provided by shareholders.
Proxy Access. In the fall of 2015,our Governance Committee, we discussed with ourreached out to shareholders for their views on proxy access. Shareholders expressed varying pointsshareholder action by written consent, as well as our existing special meeting process. We contacted the holders of view: while some indicated support for proxy access, others expressed concerns aboutapproximately 57% of our outstanding shares. Our independent Chairman of the potential costsBoard and disruption that it could impose without appropriate termsour independent Chair of the Governance Committee participated in the discussions with several of our shareholders. Feedback received from the shareholders was shared and safeguards. Following these discussions, we amended our Bylaws in December 2015 to implement proxy accessdiscussed with terms that reflected the views expressed by our shareholders.Board.
Special Meeting Right. We engaged in an extensiveAfter careful consideration of the results of the 2019 shareholder outreach effort inaction by written consent proposal and the springshareholder feedback, as well as a comprehensive review of 2015market practices and provisions adopted by other companies with respect to discuss the implementation of a shareholder right to call a special meeting. Many shareholders supported implementationact by written consent, the Board is submitting for shareholder approval an amendment and restatement of our Certificate of Incorporation to allow shareholder action by written consent, as further described in “Proposal 4—Approval of an Amendment and Restatement of our Certificate of Incorporation to Allow Shareholders to Act by Written Consent” on page 50.
Disclosure of Diversity Data.In September 2018, we disclosed key diversity data for the first time, including the gender and ethnic composition of our workforce, as well as new goals for increasing our global diversity and ensuring we have an inclusive work environment, which include increasing women and underrepresented minorities in our workforce. The disclosures not only reflect the importance of this issue to Applied, but also the input that we received from our shareholders. Shareholder feedback to the information was universally positive, with the view that it demonstrated our commitment to diversity and inclusion, transparency in disclosing data and accountability in working towards our goals.
In 2019, we provided an update of the right at a 20% ownership threshold. As a resultdiversity data published the previous year, as well as additional information regarding our engineering women employees in the U.S. and globally, to communicate the progress we are making towards our goals of this effort,increasing representation of women globally and after careful consideration of the issue,underrepresented minorities in December 2015, we amended our Bylaws to permit shareholders holding at least 20% of our outstanding shares of common stock to call a special meeting.U.S. workforce.
Shareholder Communications
Any shareholder wishing to communicate with any of our directors regarding Applied may write to the director, c/o Thomas F. Larkins,Christina Y. Lai, Corporate Secretary, Applied Materials, Inc., 3225 Oakmead Village Drive, M/S 1241,
1268, P.O. Box 58039, Santa Clara, CA 95052, or bye-mail at corporatesecretary@amat.com. The Corporate Secretary reviews correspondence directed to the Board and, at the Corporate Secretary’s discretion, forwards items that heshe deems appropriate for the Board’s consideration. The independent directors of the Board review and approve the shareholder communication process periodically in order to enable an effective method by which shareholders can communicate with the Board.
The Board has adopted stock ownership guidelines to align the interests of our directors and executive officers with those of our shareholders. The guidelines provide thatnon-employee directors should each own Applied stock with a value of at least five times the annual base retainer fornon-employee directors. Applied’s Chief Executive Officer should own Applied stock with a value of at least six times his annual base salary. Each Section 16 officer on the CEO Executive Staff should own Applied stock with a value of at least three times his or her annual base salary. As of December 31, 2017,2019, all of our directors and executive officers had metwere in compliance with the stock ownership guidelines.
Applied’s Standards of Business Conduct embody our commitment to ethical and legal business practices. The Board expects Applied’s directors, officers and all other members of its workforce to act ethically at all times and to acknowledge their commitment to Applied’s Standards of Business Conduct. The Standards of Business Conduct are available on our website at:
http://www.appliedmaterials.com/company/investor-relations/governance-documentsgovernance-documents..
The Board met five times in fiscal 2017.2019. Each director attended over 75% of all Board and applicable committee meetings held during fiscal 2017.2019. Directors are strongly encouraged to attend the Annual Meeting of Shareholders, and all of the directors serving on our Board at the time attended our 20172019 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.
The Board has three principal committees performing the functions required by applicable SEC rules and Nasdaq listing standards to be performed by independent directors: the Audit Committee, the Human Resources and Compensation Committee, and the Corporate Governance and Nominating
Committee. Each of these committees meets regularly and
14 2020 Proxy Statement
BOARD AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE PRACTICES
has a written charter approved by the Board that is reviewed annually by the respective committee and by the Board. The Board also has a Strategy Committee and an Investment Committee, whose roles and responsibilities are described in Applied’s Corporate Governance Guidelines
In addition, at each regularly-scheduled Board meeting, the Chair of each committee reports on any significant matters addressed by the committee since the last Board meeting. Each director who serves on the Audit Committee, Human Resources and Compensation Committee, or Corporate
Governance and Nominating Committee is an independent director under applicable Nasdaq listing standards and SEC rules.
Applied Materials, Inc. 13
Copies of the current charters for the Audit, Human Resources and Compensation, and Corporate Governance and Nominating Committees can be found on our website at:http://www.appliedmaterials.com/company/investor-relations/governance-documents.
The Board also has aroles and responsibilities of the Strategy Committee and anthe Investment Committee whose roles and responsibilities are described in Applied’s Corporate Governance Guidelines.
Audit Committee
Members:
Dennis D. Powell, Judy Stephen R. Forrest Adrianna C. Ma* Yvonne McGill*+
| Primary responsibilities:
● Oversee financial statements, internal control over financial reporting and auditing, accounting and financial reporting processes ● Oversee the qualifications, independence, performance and engagement of our independent registered public accounting firm ● Oversee disclosure controls and procedures, and internal audit function ● Review andpre-approve audit and permissiblenon-audit services and fees ● Oversee tax, legal, regulatory and ethical compliance ● Review and approve related-person transactions ● Oversee financial-related risks, enterprise risk management program and cybersecurity ● Oversee matters related to Environmental Health and Safety | Meetings in Fiscal | ||
* Audit Committee Financial Expert +Appointed to Committee in |
Human Resources and Compensation Committee
Members:
Thomas J. Iannotti, Chair Xun (Eric) Chen Alexander A. Karsner | Primary responsibilities:
● Oversee human resources programs, compensation and employee benefits programs, policies and plans ● Review and advise on management succession planning and executive organizational development ● Determine compensation policies for executive officers and employees ● Review the performance and determine the compensation of executive officers ● Approve and oversee equity-related incentive plans and executive bonus plans ● Review compensation policies and practices as they relate to risk management practices ● Approve the compensation program for Board members ● Oversee human capital management, including the Company’s culture and diversity and inclusion programs and initiatives | Meetings in Fiscal |
Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee
Members:
Judy Bruner, Chair Alexander A. Karsner Adrianna C. Ma Dennis D. Powell | Primary responsibilities:
● Oversee the composition, structure and evaluation of the Board and its committees ● Identify and recommend qualified candidates for election to the Board ● Establish procedures for director candidate nomination and evaluation ● Oversee corporate governance policies and practices, including Corporate Governance Guidelines ● Review and ● Review shareholder proposals and recommend to the Board actions to be taken in response to each proposal ● Review | Meetings in Fiscal | ||
|
14Applied Materials, Inc. 2018 Proxy Statement15
Compensation Program for Directors
We compensate ournon-employee directors for their service on the Board with a combination of cash and equity awards. Directors who are employees of Applied do not receive any compensation for their service as directors. In March 2017, the Human Resources and Compensation Committee, comprised solely of independent directors, approved changes to the compensation program fornon-employee directors after consideration of market data and based on the recommendation of its independent compensation consultant. These changes, which were effective beginning with the second fiscal quarter of 2017, included:
Prior to these changes, the cash compensation, consisting of annual retainers and committee meeting fees, and the grant date fair market value of annual equity awards for ournon-employee directors had not changed since fiscal 2009.
Retainer and Meeting Fees
Eachnon-employee director currently receives an annual cash retainer for his or her service on the Board, as well as additional cash retainers if he or she serves as the Chairman of the Board, on a committee or as the chair of a committee. Annual retainers are paid quarterly and are prorated based on the director’s service during the fiscal year. The following table sets forth cash compensation fornon-employee directors in effect during fiscal 2017.2019.
| Effective through Q1 FY 2017 | Effective Q2 FY 2017 | |||||||
Annual Base Retainer (prorated and paid quarterly) | $ | 65,000 | $ | 70,000 | ||||
Fee per Committee Meeting Attended | $ | 2,000 | $ | 0 | ||||
Additional Annual Retainers for Committee Service (prorated and paid quarterly): | ||||||||
Audit Committee | $ | 0 | $ | 25,000 | ||||
Human Resources and Compensation Committee | $ | 0 | $ | 12,500 | ||||
Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee | $ | 0 | $ | 10,000 | ||||
Strategy Committee | $ | 0 | $ | 10,000 | ||||
Additional Annual Retainers for Chairman and Committee Chairs (prorated and paid quarterly): | ||||||||
Chairman of the Board | $ | 150,000 | $ | 150,000 | ||||
Audit Committee Chair | $ | 20,000 | $ | 25,000 | ||||
Human Resources and Compensation Committee Chair | $ | 15,000 | $ | 20,000 | ||||
Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee Chair | $ | 10,000 | $ | 12,500 | ||||
Strategy Committee Chair | $ | 10,000 | $ | 12,500 | ||||
Annual Base Retainer (prorated and paid quarterly) | $ | 70,000 | ||
| Additional Annual Retainers for Committee Service (prorated and paid quarterly): |
|
|
| |
Audit Committee | $ | 25,000 | ||
Human Resources and Compensation Committee | $ | 12,500 | ||
Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee | $ | 10,000 | ||
Strategy Committee | $ | 10,000 | ||
Additional Annual Retainers for Chairman and Committee Chairs (prorated and paid quarterly): |
|
|
| |
Chairman of the Board | $ | 150,000 | ||
Audit Committee Chair | $ | 25,000 | ||
Human Resources and Compensation Committee Chair | $ | 20,000 | ||
Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee Chair | $ | 12,500 | ||
Strategy Committee Chair | $ | 12,500 | ||
In addition,non-employee directors receive $2,000 per meeting for service on the Investment Committee or otherad-hoc committee of which they are a member, or $3,000 per meeting if they are the chair of such a committee.Non-employee directors are reimbursed for travel and other reasonableout-of-pocket expenses related to attendance at Board and committee meetings, business events on behalf of Applied, and seminars and programs on subjects related to their Board responsibilities.
Applied Materials, Inc. 15
Equity Compensation
Initial Grant. Upon initial appointment or election to the Board, anon-employee director receives a grant of restricted stock units with respect to a number of shares of Applied common stock with a fair market value on the date of grant equal to $225,000 (rounded down to the nearest whole share),pro-rated based on the period starting on the day of initial appointment or election and ending on the day of the next scheduled annual meeting of shareholders.
Annual Grant. Eachnon-employee director elected at an annual meeting receives on that date anon-discretionary grant of restricted stock units with respect to a number of shares of Applied common stock with a fair market value on the date of grant equal to $225,000 (rounded down to the nearest whole share). Anon-employee director who is initially appointed or elected to the Board on the day of an annual meeting of shareholders receives only an annual grant. Each of ournon-employee directorsre-elected at the 20172019 Annual Meeting received a grant of 6,0195,988 restricted stock units on that date.
Vesting.Grants made to ournon-employee directors vest in full on the earlier of March 1 of the year following the date of grant or the next annual meeting, provided thenon-employee
director remains on the Board through the scheduled vesting date. Vesting of these grants will be accelerated in full upon anon-employee director’s earlier termination of service on the Board due to disability or death, or upon a change of control of Applied if the director ceases to be anon-employee director (and does not become a member of the board of directors of any successor corporation or its parent).Non-employee directors may elect in advance to defer receipt of vested shares until their termination of service on the Board.
Limit on Awards.Under our amended and restated Employee Stock Incentive Plan, grants of equity awards to any individualnon-employee director may not exceed a fair market value totaling more than $400,000 in any fiscal year.
Charitable Matching Contributions
Non-employee directors are eligible to participate in The Applied Materials Foundation Matching Gift Program, under which the Foundation annually will match up to $3,000 of anon-employee director’s donations to eligiblenon-profit civic, arts, environmental and educational organizations.organizations, as well as match an unlimited amount of donations to our annual food drive. In addition,
16 2020 Proxy Statement
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
non-employee directors are eligible to participate in a matching program under the Applied Materials, Inc. Political Action Committee, under which the Company annually will match up to $2,500 of anon-employee director’s contributions for the benefit of eligiblenon-profit organizations
and kindergarten to 12th grade public andnon-profit private schools in the U.S.Non-employee directors are subject to the same maximum matching amountamounts and other terms as those for Applied’s employees.
Director Compensation for Fiscal 20172019
| Name | Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($) | Stock Awards ($)(1)(2) | All Other Compensation ($)(3) | Total ($) | Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($) | Stock Awards ($)(1)(2) | All Other Compensation ($)(3) | Total ($) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Judy Bruner | 108,026 | 222,643 | 3,000 | 333,669 | 117,500 | 220,119 | 6,500 | 344,119 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Xun (Eric) Chen | 91,625 | 222,643 | 2,000 | 316,268 | 92,500 | 220,119 | — | 312,619 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Aart J. de Geus | 92,125 | 222,643 | — | 314,768 | 104,500 | 220,119 | — | 324,619 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stephen R. Forrest | 96,390 | 222,643 | — | 319,033 | 117,000 | 220,119 | 750 | 337,869 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Thomas J. Iannotti | 202,760 | 222,643 | 1,750 | 427,153 | 252,500 | 220,119 | 4,000 | 476,619 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Susan M. James(4) | 41,017 | — | — | 41,017 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Alexander A. Karsner | 94,669 | 222,643 | 2,000 | 319,312 | 92,500 | 220,119 | — | 312,619 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adrianna C. Ma | 102,956 | 222,643 | — | 325,599 | 123,000 | 220,119 | 2,000 | 345,119 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Scott A. McGregor(5) | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Yvonne McGill(4) | 25,577 | 142,201 | — | 167,778 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Scott A. McGregor | 105,000 | 220,119 | 6,000 | 331,119 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dennis D. Powell | 130,750 | 222,643 | — | 353,393 | 140,000 | 220,119 | — | 360,119 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Willem P. Roelandts(4) | 76,717 | — | — | 76,717 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (1) | Amounts shown do not reflect compensation actually received by the directors. Instead, these amounts represent the grant date fair value of stock awards granted in fiscal |
| (2) | Each |
| (3) | Amount shown represents The Applied Materials Foundation’s and/or the Company’s matching contribution of the director’s |
| (4) | Ms. |
16Applied Materials, Inc. 2018 Proxy Statement17
STOCK OWNERSHIP INFORMATION
The following table shows the number of shares of our common stock beneficially owned as of December 31, 20172019 by each person known by Applied to own 5% or more of our common stock. In general, “beneficial ownership” refers to shares that an entity or individual had the power to vote or the power to dispose of, and shares that such entity or individual had the right to acquire within 60 days after December 31, 2017.2019.
The Vanguard Group BlackRock, Inc. State Street Corporation | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (1) | Percentage ownership is calculated by dividing the number of shares beneficially owned by such person or group by |
| (2) | The amended Schedule 13G filed with the SEC by The Vanguard Group (“Vanguard”) on February |
| (3) | The amended Schedule 13G filed with the SEC by BlackRock, Inc. (“BlackRock”) on |
| (4) | The amended Schedule 13G filed with the SEC by State Street Corporation (“State Street”) on February 13, 2019 indicates that as of December 31, 2018, State Street had shared dispositive power over 44,618,743 shares and shared voting power over 43,477,113 shares. |
Applied Materials, Inc. 1817 2020 Proxy Statement
STOCK OWNERSHIP INFORMATION
Directors and Executive Officers
The following table shows the number of shares of our common stock beneficially owned as of December 31, 20172019 by: (1) each director and director nominee, (2) each NEO and (3) the current directors and executive officers as a group. In general, “beneficial ownership” refers to shares that a director or executive officer had the power to vote or the power to dispose of, and shares that such individual had the right to acquire within 60 days after December 31, 2017.2019.
| Shares Beneficially Owned | ||||||||||||||
| Name | Number(1) | Percent(2) | ||||||||||||
Directors, not including the CEO: | ||||||||||||||
Judy Bruner | * | |||||||||||||
Xun (Eric) Chen | 24,578 | (3) | * | |||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
Aart J. de Geus | * | |||||||||||||
Stephen R. Forrest | * | |||||||||||||
Thomas J. Iannotti | * | |||||||||||||
Alexander A. Karsner | * | |||||||||||||
Adrianna C. Ma | (4) | * | ||||||||||||
| * | |||||||||||||
Scott A. McGregor | 4,261 | * | ||||||||||||
Dennis D. Powell | * | |||||||||||||
Named Executive Officers: | ||||||||||||||
Gary E. Dickerson | * | |||||||||||||
Daniel J. Durn | * | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
Ali Salehpour | * | |||||||||||||
Prabu G. Raja | 241,635 | * | ||||||||||||
Steve G. Ghanayem | 283,882 | * | ||||||||||||
Current Directors and Executive Officers, as a Group | * | |||||||||||||
| * | Less than 1% |
| (1) | Except as subject to applicable community property laws, the persons named in the table have sole voting and investment power with respect to all of their shares of common stock. |
| (2) | Percentage ownership is calculated by dividing the number of shares beneficially owned by such person or group by the sum of |
| (3) | Includes |
| (4) | Includes 20,681 restricted stock units that |
| (5) |
Includes |
| (6) | Includes 18,630 restricted stock units that are scheduled to vest within 60 days after December 31, |
| (7) | Includes |
18Applied Materials, Inc. 2018 Proxy Statement19
PROPOSAL 2—APPROVAL, ON AN ADVISORY BASIS, OF THE COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
PROPOSAL 2—APPROVAL, ON AN ADVISORY BASIS, OF THE COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
Pursuant to Section 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), we are asking shareholders to approve, on anon-binding, advisory basis, the compensation of our NEOs, as described in this Proxy Statement. We seek this approval each year. Our annual“say-on-pay” proposals have been supported by our shareholders each year since we began providing this vote in 2011, and received the support of 98%96% of votes cast in 2017.2019.
Our Board of Directors believes that our compensation policies and practices promote a performance-based culture and align our executives’ interests with those of our shareholders through a strong emphasis onat-risk compensation tied to the achievement of performance objectives and shareholder value. Our executive compensation program is also designed to attract and retain highly-talented executives who are critical to the successful implementation of Applied’s strategic plan.
Pay Aligned withand Performance. There is strong alignmentWe align compensation with our business objectives, performance and shareholder interests. See pages 26 and 35 for charts illustrating the connection between key financial and companyCompany performance metrics and the compensation paid to our CEO during the last five fiscal years. See pages 26 and 35 for charts illustrating this alignment.
Significant Portion of CEO Pay Consists of Variable Compensation and Long-Term Incentives. In fiscal 2017, 93%2019, 92% of our CEO’s compensation comprised variable compensation elements, and 75%84% of his overall compensation
compensation was delivered in equity with multi-year vesting. Performance objectives include financial and market objectives relating to adjusted operating margin, adjusted gross margin, WFE market share and earnings per share,relative TSR, as well as strategic and operational objectives, as described on page 32.pages 32 and 33.
Please see the“Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section for further discussion of our executive compensation program and the fiscal 20172019 compensation of our NEOs.
We are asking our shareholders to approve the compensation of our NEOs as described in this Proxy Statement by voting in favor of the following resolution:
“RESOLVED, that the shareholders approve, on anon-binding, advisory basis, the compensation paid to the Company’s named executive officers as disclosed in the Company’s Proxy Statement for the 20182020 Annual Meeting of Shareholders pursuant to Item 402 of RegulationS-K, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section, the Summary Compensation Table, other compensation tables, narrative discussion and related disclosure.”
Even though thissay-on-pay vote is advisory and therefore will not be binding on the Company, the HRCC and the Board value the opinions of our shareholders, and will consider the results of the vote when making future compensation decisions for our NEOs.
| ✓ | THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTEFOR THE APPROVAL, ON AN ADVISORY BASIS, OF THE COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS FOR FISCAL YEAR
| |
Applied Materials, Inc. 2019 2020 Proxy Statement
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Our Business and Strategy
Applied Materials is the leader in materials engineering solutions used to produce virtually every new chip and advanced display in the world. Our expertise in modifying materials at atomic levels and on an industrial scale enables customers to transform possibilities into reality. At Applied Materials, our innovations make possible the technology shaping the future.
We develop, design, produce and service semiconductor and display equipment for manufacturers that sell into highly competitive and rapidly changing end markets. Our competitive positioning is driven by our ability to identify major materials engineering technology inflections early, and to develop highly differentiated materials engineering solutions for our customers to enable those technology inflections. Through our broad portfolio of products and technologies, innovation leadership and focused investments in research and development, we are enabling our customers’ success thereby generating record performance for the company and creating significant value for our shareholders.
Our Performance Highlights
Over the past several years, our broad portfolio of products and services has made Applied a more resilient company that can perform well in a variety of conditions. In 2017,2019, we celebrated our 50th anniversarydelivered solid performance against very aggressive targets in a challenging market environment that was affected by down cycles in both memory and deliveredall-time record revenue, operating profit and earnings per share.display equipment spending. Key highlights include:
| ● | Revenue of |
| ● | Operating profit of |
| ● | Delivered operating |
| ● |
| Returned |
Highlights of five-year performance achievements across key financial measures
|
|
|
Non-GAAP adjusted operating margin andnon-GAAP adjusted EPS are performance targets under our bonus and long-term incentive plans. See Appendix A fornon-GAAP reconciliations.
20Applied Materials, Inc. 2018 Proxy Statement21
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Key financial highlights for our reporting segments in fiscal 20172019 include the following:
| ● | Semiconductor Systems segment: we delivered |
| ● | Applied Global Services segment: we grew revenue to a record |
| ● | For the calendar year 2019, we expect to outperform both the WFE market and our process equipment peers. |
| ● | Display and Adjacent Markets segment: we delivered |
Strategic and Operational Highlights
Applied’s strategy is to deliver highly differentiated materials engineering products and services that enable major technology inflections and drive our customers’ success.
See inflections early Identify customers High Value Problems Develop Differentiated Valuable Sustainable products Ensure customer success + Generate residual value
We believe the electronics industry is in a period of transition as major new growth drivers emerge in the form of the Internet of Things (IoT), big data and artificial intelligence (AI). In fiscal 2017,2019, we continued to drive profitable growth by executing againstfocus on initiatives that will help accelerate our strategy.customers’ roadmaps and put Applied in the best position for the future. Key highlights include:
| ● | We continued to prioritize our |
| ● | In addition to advancements in |
| ● | We strengthened our capabilities to address the growing number of applications within the IoT, communications, automotive, power and |
| ● | We grew our installed base of |
| ● | We expanded our R&D capabilities by opening the Materials Engineering Technology Accelerator (META Center), astate-of-the-art facility aimed at speeding customer prototyping of new |
Chief Financial Officer Transition. In August 2017, we welcomed a new Chief Financial Officer, Daniel J. Durn, who succeeded Robert J. Halliday. Mr. Durn bringsThe HRCC approved an aggressive set of scorecard targets for the executive officers for fiscal 2019, including financial targets above any levels that Applied had achieved in the past, as well as equally challenging operational targets. Although the aggressive targets resulted in below-target bonus payments, the Company expects to see market share growth for calendar year 2019 and also made significant industry experienceprogress on long-term growth initiatives.
During fiscal 2019, Applied delivered solid financial and knowledge that will further accelerate our strategy.
Applied Materials, Inc. 21
Stock Price Performance
Our strong strategic and financialoperational performance in fiscal 2017 also resulted ina challenging environment and made meaningful value creation forprogress towards our shareholders. As illustratedlong-term strategic goals that are focused on enabling strong longer-term revenue and EPS growth; however, the results were below Applied significantly outperformed both our peer group and the S&P 500 Information Technology Index.
FY2013 – FY2017 Total Shareholder Return vs. Key Peers
Key Fiscal 2017 Executive Compensation Highlights
Key compensation decisions for fiscal 2017 include:
Limited Salary Increases for Select NEOs.Two NEOs received modest salary increases from 2016 levels to reflect each officer’s responsibilities.
Annual Bonuses Reflect Strong Company Performance. The average annualaggressively set targets. Accordingly, bonus payouts to our NEOs was 134% ofexecutive officers were below target bonus reflecting our strong performance against fiscal 2017 objectives.
Adopted New Long-Term Incentive Program.In response to shareholder feedback as well as a broad reviewamounts. As part of our executive compensationmulti-year incentive program, in fiscal 2016,for the period of 2017 to 2019, the HRCC completed a comprehensive redesign of the long-term incentive program that was effective beginning with fiscal 2017 grants. Key redesign elements included:
| approved aggressive goals for |
Our new long-term incentive program equity mix establishes a more direct balance between rigorous, performance-based incentives and retention-based incentives, both of which the HRCC believes are critical components of our compensation program. Additionally, new performance measures(non-GAAP adjusted operating margin and wafer fabrication equipment (WFE)WFE market share) consider bothshare. The results for this three-year performance period were above target, resulting in above target level performance share unit awards for our absolute and relative performance, and align with our stated strategic priorities to ensure our management team’s long-term incentives match our long-term goals.executive officers.
22 20182020 Proxy Statement
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
SummaryStock Price Performance
In fiscal 2019, our stock price performance reflected steady market optimism, particularly in the second half of Changes to Long-Term Incentive Programthe year, as the semiconductor market environment showed early signs of strength in foundry and logic spending, and continued reduction in memory inventory levels. Over the past five years, Applied has outperformed the S&P 500 Index, as shown below. In addition, Applied outperformed peers by over 40% in fiscal 2019.
FY2015 – FY2019 Total Shareholder Return vs. Key Peers
| ||||
|
| |||
|
| |||
|
| |||
|
| |||
|
| |||
|
| |||
|
| |||
|
| |||
|
| |||
Stock Ownership Guidelines. In fiscal 2017, the HRCC approved changes to our stock ownership guidelines to increase the CEO ownership level from 5x to 6x of annual base salary and expanded the applicability of the guidelines (3x of annual base salary) to all Section 16 officers on the CEO Executive Staff.
Applied Materials, Inc. 23
Primary Compensation Elements and Executive Compensation Highlights for Fiscal 20172019
The primary elements of our compensation program consist of base salary, annual incentive bonuses and annual long-term incentive awards. Other elements of compensation include a 401(k) savings plan, deferred compensation benefits and other benefits programs that are generally available to all employees. Primary elements and highlights of our fiscal 20172019 compensation program were as follows:
| Element of Pay | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Base Salary (see page 29)
|
∎ |
Fixed cash compensation for expectedday-to-day responsibilities
| ∎ | Fiscal 2019 salaries for each named executive officer (“NEO”) increased from 2018 levels to reflect increases in competitive pay positioning levels | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ∎ | Reviewed annually and adjusted when appropriate, based on scope of responsibility, performance, time in role, experience, and competitive market for executive talent
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Annual Incentive Bonuses (see page 29) | ∎ ∎ ∎ ∎
∎ |
Variable compensation paid in cash
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Based on performance against
Financial andnon-financial metrics
Performance metrics evaluated annually for alignment with strategy and market trends NEO annual incentives determined through three-step performance measurement process:
Funding Allocation 1 Initial Funding Threshold Non-GAAP Adjusted EPS 2 Corporate Scorecard Business and Strategic Goals 3 Individual Performance Modifier Individual NEO Performance | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
∎
∎
∎
∎ |
Fiscal 2019 target bonuses as a percentage of base salary were the same as fiscal 2018 levels for all the NEOs, except for Mr. Durn, whose target was increased to reflect the competitive pay positioning level for annual incentive targets for CFOs
|
| Based on achievement compared to goals, fiscal 2019 actual annual bonuses ranged from 0.49x to 0.69x target for our NEOs
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Long-Term Incentives (see page 35)
|
∎ ∎ ∎ ∎ |
Performance share units (“PSUs”) to establishrigorous long-term performance alignment
Restricted stock units (“RSUs”) to provide link to shareholder value creation and retention value PSUs vest based on achievement of 3-year non-GAAP adjusted operating margin and 3-year Total Shareholder Return (“TSR”) measured against the S&P 500 PSUs vests at end of 3-year performance period, based on achievement of performance goals; RSUs vest ratably over 3 years |
∎ ∎ ∎ |
Non-GAAP adjusted operating margin For fiscal 2019, the WFE market share
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
24 20182020 Proxy Statement
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Pay Mix
In fiscal 2017,2019, a significant portion of our executive compensation consisted of variable compensation and long-term incentives. As illustrated below, 93%92% of CEO compensation for fiscal 20172019 comprised variable compensation elements, and 75%84% of Mr. Dickerson’sCEO overall compensation was delivered in equity with multi-year vesting.
| ||
CEO | All Other NEOs | |
| 
| |
1Represents total direct compensation for fiscal 2017; excludes new CFO Daniel J. Durn, who joined Applied in August 2017FY2019.
Summary of 20172019 Total Direct Compensation
The following table summarizes elements of annual total direct compensation for our NEOs for fiscal 2017,2019, consisting of (1) base salary, (2) annual incentive bonus and (3) annual long-term incentive awards (the grant date fair value of stock awards). This table excludes amounts not considered by the HRCC to be annual total direct compensation, that aresuch as certain other amounts required by the SEC to be reported in the Summary Compensation Table (see page 41 of this Proxy Statement).
| Name and Principal Position | Salary ($) | Annual ($) | Annual ($) | Total ($) | ||||||||||||
Gary E. Dickerson | 1,000,000 | 2,640,000 | 10,844,501 | 14,484,501 | ||||||||||||
Daniel J. Durn(1) | 138,462 | — | 2,952,086 | 3,090,548 | ||||||||||||
Robert J. Halliday | 625,000 | 1,113,750 | 4,231,139 | 5,969,889 | ||||||||||||
Ali Salehpour | 591,346 | 1,060,290 | 3,868,486 | 5,520,122 | ||||||||||||
Omkaram Nalamasu | 484,808 | 770,770 | 2,176,031 | 3,431,609 | ||||||||||||
Thomas F. Larkins | 480,000 | 702,768 | 2,176,031 | 3,358,799 | ||||||||||||
| Name and Principal Position | Salary ($) | Annual ($) | Annual ($) | Total ($) | ||||||||||||
Gary E. Dickerson | 1,024,808 | 1,133,000 | 11,696,506 | 13,854,314 | ||||||||||||
Daniel J. Durn | 620,673 | 580,078 | 3,931,029 | 5,131,780 | ||||||||||||
Ali Salehpour | 620,673 | 411,750 | 3,931,029 | 4,963,452 | ||||||||||||
Prabu G. Raja | 564,058 | 430,948 | 2,892,132 | 3,887,138 | ||||||||||||
Steve G. Ghanayem | 564,058 | 497,543 | 2,892,132 | 3,953,733 | ||||||||||||
Applied Materials, Inc. 25
Alignment of Pay withand Performance
The following chart shows the alignment between total shareholder return (“TSR”) and the total direct compensation of our CEOHRCC approves aggressive performance goals for the last fiveCEO, as well as for the entire executive leadership team. As a result, despite outstanding TSR growth from fiscal years. While TSR has grown significantly over the last four years,2015 through 2019, our CEO’s total direct compensation has remained relativelyessentially flat during thatover the same period.
| (1) | Total direct compensation consists of annual base salary, |
| (2) | TSR line illustrates the total shareholder return on our common stock during the period from October |
26 20182020 Proxy Statement
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Other Key Compensation Practices
We are committed to executive compensation practices that drive performance, mitigate risk and align the interests of our leadership team with the interests of our shareholders. Below is a summary of best practices that we have implemented and practices that we avoid because we believe they are not in the best interests of Applied or our shareholders.
| WHAT WE DO | WHAT WE DO NOT DO | |||||||
✓ | Pay for Performance– Significant majority of NEO target compensation is performance-based and tied topre-established performance goals aligned with our short- and long-term objectives. | Ò | No Guaranteed Bonuses– Our annual bonus plans are performance-based and do not include any minimum payment levels. | |||||
|
| |||||||
✓ | Mitigation of Risk– Use of varied performance measures in incentive programs mitigates risk that executives will be motivated to pursue results with respect to any one performance measure to the detriment of Applied as a whole. | Ò | No Hedging or Pledging– Our insider trading policy prohibits all directors, NEOs and | |||||
|
| |||||||
✓ | Compensation Recoupment Policy– Both our annual cash bonus plan and our stock incentive plan contain “clawback” provisions providing for reimbursement of incentive compensation from NEOs in certain circumstances. | Ò | No Perquisites– We do not provide material perquisites or other personal benefits to our NEOs or directors, except in connection with business-related relocation. | |||||
|
| |||||||
✓ | Stock Ownership Guidelines– All senior officers and directors are subject to stock ownership guidelines to align their interests with shareholders’ interests. | Ò | No Dividends on Unvested Equity Awards– We do not pay dividends or dividend equivalents on unvested equity awards. | |||||
|
| |||||||
✓ | Double-TriggerChange-in-Control Provisions– Equity awards for all NEOs require a “double-trigger” of both achange-in-control and termination of employment for vesting acceleration benefits to apply. | Ò | No Executive Pensions– We do not offer any executive pension | |||||
|
| |||||||
✓ | AnnualSay-On-Pay Vote– We seek annual shareholder feedback on our executive compensation program. | �� Ò | No TaxGross-Ups– We do not pay taxgross-ups, except in connection with business-related relocation or expatriate assignments. | |||||
Applied Materials, Inc. 27
Compensation Governance and Decision-Making Framework
Overview of Compensation Program Philosophy and Governance Framework
Our executive compensation program has three principal objectives:
| ● | To attract, reward and retain highly-talented executive officers and other key employees; |
| ● | To motivate these individuals to achieve short-term and long-term goals that enhance shareholder value; and |
| ● | To support our core values and culture. |
We seek to achieve these objectives by:
| ● | Providing compensation that is competitive with the practices of other leading, high-technology companies; and |
| ● | Linking rewards to |
| ∎ | Setting challenging performance goals for executive officers and other key employees; |
| ∎ | Balancing retention needs with performance objectives; and |
| ∎ | Providing a high proportion of total target compensation in the form of equity incentives to motivate executive officers and key employees to increase long-term value in alignment with shareholders’ interests. |
The HRCC uses these principles to determine base salaries, annual incentive bonuses and long-term incentive awards. The HRCC also considers Applied’s business objectives, external factors such as geopolitical and economic environment, competitive practices and trends, and corporate considerations, including the affordability of the compensation program.
The HRCC further considers the results of the annual advisory“say-on-pay” vote and shareholder feedback. In response to feedback from our shareholders as well as a broad review of our executive compensation program in 2016, the HRCC made changes to certain elements of the annual incentive bonus program and redesigned the
long-term incentive program for fiscal 2017. At our Annual Meeting in 2017,2019, our“say-on-pay” proposal received a substantial majority (98%(96%) of votes cast. TheIn consideration of this vote and feedback from our shareholders gathered through our outreach efforts, the HRCC considered the vote results as strong shareholder support for our approved an
executive compensation program structure for fiscal 2019 that is unchanged from the fiscal 2018 program.
Fiscal 20172019 Peer Group Companies
The HRCC regularly reviews compensation paid by our peer group, which consists of a broad range of high-technology companies whose businesses are similar to ours and with which we typically compete for executive talent, as a reference point for evaluating our compensation program.
For the composition of the fiscal 20172019 peer group, we considered companies that met the following criteria: (1) technology companies with manufacturing operations, (2) companies whose revenues or market capitalization were approximatelyone-third to five times that of Applied, (3) U.S. based publicly-traded companies with global operations that disclose executive compensation pursuant to SEC rules, (4) companies that compete with us for key talent, and (5) companies that devote significant resources to research and development as a percentage of revenue.revenue or have approximatelyone-half to two times market capitalization to revenue multiple as that of Applied. Based on this assessment, the HRCC determined to exclude Broadcom Corp.remove Juniper Networks, Inc., which was part of the 2016fiscal 2018 peer group, from the fiscal 20172019 peer group dueas it no longer met most of the screening criteria listed above, including revenue and multiple of market capitalization to its acquisition by Avago Technologies in 2016.revenue. The HRCC added Analog Devices, Inc. to the fiscal 2019 peer group as it met the criteria for multiple of market capitalization to revenue and it has a stronger business fit with Applied relative to Juniper Networks. Each of the other companies in the peer group listed below met most, if not all, of the five screening criteria listed above and continued to be included in the peer group; in addition, several of the companies were among our principal U.S. competitors or top U.S. customers.
Data gathered on the peer group include base salary, bonus, targeted cash compensation, long-term incentive awards and total direct compensation. The HRCC uses this information as a reference point rather than to target a specific percentile for our NEOs. The peer group data is gathered from the sources described in “Role of Compensation Consultant” below.
28 20182020 Proxy Statement
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
The tables below set forth ourOur fiscal 20172019 peer group and related information.information are set forth below.
| Fiscal | ||
| Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. | Micron Technology, Inc. | |
| Motorola Solutions, Inc. | |
| Broadcom, Inc. | NetApp, Inc. | |
| Cisco Systems, Inc. | ||
| Corning Inc. | ||
| QUALCOMM, Inc. | ||
| Intel Corp. | ||
| Seagate Technology plc | ||
| Texas Instruments, | ||
| Lam Research Corp. | Western Digital Corp. | |
Applied Materials Positioning Relative to Peers
Components of Total Direct Compensation
Determining Annual Total Direct Compensation
At the beginning of fiscal 2017,2019, the HRCC evaluated each NEO’s annual total direct compensation – consisting of annual base salary, annual incentive bonus and annual long-term incentive award. As part of this annual evaluation, the HRCC considers the NEO’s scope of responsibility, performance, skill set, prior experience and achievements, advancement potential, impact on results and expected future contributions to our business. The HRCC also considers the compensation levels of an executive officer relative to other Applied officers, the need to attract and retain talent, and business conditions, and compensation levels at our peer companies for comparable positions; however, no individual element of compensation is targeted to a peer percentile range. The HRCC uses peer group data as a tool to assess how our executives’ compensation compares to the market rather than as a means to establish specific target compensation levels. Actual pay results vary based on the overall performance of the Company and individual NEO performance, as the largest portion of NEO compensation is performance-based.
Base Salaries
Base salaries and bonus opportunities are designed to attract, motivate, reward and retain executive talent, as well as to align pay with performance. At the beginning of each fiscal year, the HRCC determines each NEO’s targeted total cash compensation (salary and target bonus).
Base salaries are an annual fixed level of cash compensation. At the beginning of fiscal 2017, the HRCC increased Mr. Salehpour’s base salary from $550,000 to $600,000 and Dr. Nalamasu’s from $460,000 to $490,000 to
reflect each officer’s performance, role and responsibilities, and retention considerations. The HRCC did not change base salariesapproved an increase for the other NEOs in fiscal 2017. The HRCC determinedeach NEO’s salary to ensure that continuing base salary amounts from fiscal 2016 for those other NEOs was sufficientlyit continues to reflect competitive pay positioning levels of similar roles, as well as to provide adequate retention value and allowedvalue. Applied continues to continue its focus onthe weighting of cash compensation more heavily toward performance-based incentives.
Annual Incentive Bonus Opportunities
Bonus Plan Overview. In fiscal 2017,2019, all of our NEOs participated in the Senior Executive Bonus Plan (the “Bonus Plan”), except for Mr. Durn. Mr. Durn was not eligible to participate in the Bonus Plan for fiscal 2017 due to the timing of his hire two months before the end of the fiscal year.. The Bonus Plan is a shareholder-approved bonus program designed to motivate and reward achievement of Applied’s business goals aligned with delivering shareholder value and to attract and retain highly-talented individuals. The annual incentive bonus opportunity for each NEO under the Bonus Plan is directly linked to Applied’s achievement of financial and market performance, operational performance and strategic objectives, in addition to individual performance. Company and individual goals are designed to incentivize management to drive strong operating performance, invest in innovation to drive future growth and create shareholder value. Our Bonus Plan is performance-based and does not include any minimum payment levels. Fiscal 2017 bonuses under this plan are intended to qualify as “performance-based” compensation under Section 162(m).
Determining Target Bonus Amounts. Target bonus amounts for the NEOs are expressed as a percentage of base salary. The HRCC setapproves the annual target bonus amount for each NEO, taking into consideration Mr. Dickerson’s recommendations regarding the annual target bonus amounts for each of the NEOs other than himself. In early fiscal 2019, Mr. Dickerson recommended that, for each NEO, other than Mr. Durn, the target bonus amounts remain unchanged from fiscal 2018. Mr. Dickerson recommended, and the HRCC approved, increasing Mr. Durn’s target bonus from 110% to 135% of his salary to reflect an increase in the competitive pay positioning level for annual incentive targets for CFOs. The HRCC considered a number of factors, including publicly available data and market survey data, as well as an assessment of overall economic and business conditions in deciding not to increase Mr. Dickerson’s target bonus.
Applied Materials, Inc. 29
for each of the NEOs other than himself. In early fiscal 2017, Mr. Dickerson recommended that, for each NEO, the target bonus amounts remain unchanged from fiscal 2016. In making his recommendations, Mr. Dickerson relied on a variety of factors, including publicly-available data and market
survey data, as described above, as well as his assessment of overall economic and business conditions. The HRCC considered these same factors in deciding not to increase Mr. Dickerson’s target bonus.
Assessing Performance and Payout. The determination of fiscal 20172019 performance and annual incentive bonuses for our NEOs consisted of three key steps, as illustrated in the diagram below and the following discussion.
NEO Bonus Determination Initial Funding Threshold Threshold performance requirement that must be achieved for maximum bonuses to become available Initial funding threshold for fiscal 2019 was non-GAAP adjusted EPS of $2.90 Corporate Scorecard Assessment of performance against pre-defined financial, operational and strategic corporate goals For fiscal 2019, for our CEO and CFO, 50% based on financial and market performance and execution goals; 50% based on objective and measurable operational and strategic goals Individual Performance Factor Assessment of individual NEO performance against personal objectives and contributions to the business
The HRCC believes that this multi-step performance framework appropriately emphasizes financial performance, while also providing a mechanism to assess achievement of key business imperatives by individual NEOsNEOs.
Initial Performance Goal.Funding Threshold. For fiscal 2017,2019, the HRCC chosenon-GAAP adjusted EPS as the initial performance hurdle to establish 162(m) tax deductibility.funding threshold. EPS, an indicator of overall companyCompany financial performance, is a measure of profits generated on a per share basis that are available either to reinvest in the business or distribute to shareholders, and has a strong link to share price valuation.
If Applied does not achieve a thresholdnon-GAAP adjusted EPS of $1.75$2.90 for the fiscal year, no bonus is payable. If this threshold is achieved, the maximum bonus that becomes payable for each NEO is the lowest of: (a) $5 million, (b) 3x a corporate bonus pool funding modifier, multiplied by the target bonus, and (c) 3x the target bonus, as a percentage of base salary.
In fiscal 2017,2019, Applied’snon-GAAP adjusted EPS was $3.25,$3.04, resulting in achievement of the initial performance goalfunding threshold under the Bonus Plan. Adjusted EPS is anon-GAAP measure that excludes certain items from EPS determined in accordance with GAAP (see Appendix A for a reconciliation ofnon-GAAP adjusted EPS).
Non-GAAP adjusted EPS does not exclude share-based compensation expenses.
Balanced Corporate Scorecard. If the initial performance goal is achieved, the HRCC then uses the corporate scorecard to evaluate achievement ofpre-defined corporate objectives and goals for each NEO and as a primary mechanism to exercise negative discretion from the maximum bonus amount. The scorecard is designed to measure financial andnon-financial objectives that are considered by the HRCC to be key drivers
30 2018 Proxy Statement
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
of the Company’s near-term financial and operational success that will create shareholder value over the longer-term. As in previous years, theThe fiscal 20172019 scorecard measured corporate performance in fivefour broad categories: (1) Financial and Market Performance and Execution, (2) Products and Growth, (3) Execution, (4) Customers and Field and Service and
(5)(4) People and Organization. These categories align with and support the Company’s strategy of strengthening our materials engineering capabilities to enable major technology inflections for our customers and positioning Applied for sustainable growth to support long-term value creation for its shareholders.
30 2020 Proxy Statement
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Scorecard Category | Weighting and CFO
| Link to Company Strategy and Performance
| ||
| Financial and Market Performance and Execution | 50% | Financial, market share and TSR goals align with a focus on delivering sustainable performance that increases shareholder value Incentivizes increased efficiency in operational process, product development success and quality and safety performance | ||
| Products and Growth | 30% | Reinforces strategy of developing new and differentiated products and services and positioning Applied and its products for future revenue and market share growth | ||
| Promotes focus on | ||||
| People and Organization | 7.5% | Drives focus on greater employee engagement to promote hiring, retention and development of key talent | ||
NEO Objectives and Weightings. Each NEO was assigned individualized weightings for all measures other than the Financial and Market Performance measures (which were weighted at 50% for all NEOs), to reflect the relative impact and contributions of that NEO and his business or organizational unit to Applied’s overall performance with respect to a particular measure. The corporate scorecard objectives and weightings were the same for Mr. Dickerson and Mr. Halliday. All other NEOs shared theseDurn. The objectives butand weightings for each had different weightings asNEO are set forth in the table below.
Goal Setting and Measurement. At the beginning of the fiscal year, the HRCC reviewed objectives, goals and weightings initially proposed by management, and provided input and made
adjustments, and approvedto the final corporate scorecard and individual weightings for each NEO. Scorecard objectives are intended to be very challenging to incentivize our NEOs to achieve performance
levels that are higher than our externally communicated financial targets. Consequently, delivering results below the 100% target level can still represent very meaningful progress towards our long-term strategic goals. Progress towards achieving the corporate scorecard objectives was evaluated and tracked quarterly during the fiscal year. Scores were awarded for each metric under the scorecard based on the degree to which thepre-determined goals for that metric were achieved. Performance hurdles were set to measure achievement at 0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5 and 2.0 levels, with a score of 1.0 indicating performance that met very high expectations and scores over 1.0 indicating extraordinary achievement. At the end of the fiscal year, scores were calculated based on actual performance against objectives and were presented to the HRCC to review, adjust and approve.
Applied Materials, Inc. 31
The following table details fiscal 20172019 corporate scorecard objectives, their relative weightings for each NEO, who participated in the Bonus Plan, the achievements based on performance against rigorous objectives and the resulting scores, as approved by the HRCC (see Appendix A fornon-GAAP reconciliations). The HRCC approved an aggressive set of scorecard targets for the executive officers for fiscal 2019, including financial targets above any levels that Applied had achieved in the past, as well as equally challenging operational targets. During fiscal 2019, Applied delivered solid financial and operational performance in a challenging environment and made meaningful progress towards our long-term strategic goals that are focused on enabling strong longer-term revenue and EPS growth; however, the results were below aggressively set targets. Accordingly, bonus payouts to our executive officers were below target bonus amounts.
| Weightings | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Objectives | Dickerson and Halliday | Salehpour | Nalamasu | Larkins | Achievements | Score | ||||||||||||||||
Financial and Market Performance | 50.0% | 50.0% | 50.0% | 50.0% | ||||||||||||||||||
● Grow wafer fabrication equipment (measured by Gartner) and Display market share | ● Estimating 22% of wafer fabrication equipment market share in calendar 2017 and ~70% share gains in Display equipment served available market | 0.6 | (1) | |||||||||||||||||||
● Achieve gross margin targets (gross margin reported externally) | ● Achieved 46.1%non-GAAP adjusted gross margin | 1.5 | ||||||||||||||||||||
● Achieve adjusted operating margin goal (operating margin reported externally) | ● Achieved 27.9%non-GAAP adjusted operating margin | 1.5 | ||||||||||||||||||||
● Achieve TSR target relative to peers | ● Achieved targeted TSR performance in semiconductor equipment peer group | 1.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Products and Growth | 15.0% | 19.0% | 32.0% | 15.0% | ||||||||||||||||||
● Win development tool of record and production tool of record positions at key Semiconductor Systems and Display customers | ● Exceeded target number of development tool of record and production tool of record positions | 1.7 | (1) | |||||||||||||||||||
● Grow service revenue and number of tools under service contracts | ● Increased net tools under service agreements in line with annual target | 1.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||
● Develop organic growth pipeline to deliver targeted incremental fiscal 2019 revenue in new and adjacent markets | ● Developed pipeline to deliver risk-adjusted 2019 revenues in excess of published financial model | 1.5 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Execution | 15.0% | 15.0% | 8.0% | 15.0% | ||||||||||||||||||
● Reduceorder-to-cash cycle time per plan | ● Achieved below targetedorder-to-cash cycle time | 0.5 | ||||||||||||||||||||
● Improve product success rate and commercialization of winning products | ● Implemented “Winning Team” best practices for top 12 programs; developed Capability Maturing Model and assessment plan for Product Development Engine and achieved a winning ROI assessment for 70% of the programs | 1.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||
● Improve operational, quality and safety performance | ● Successfully drove improvements in on time delivery, materials cost and safety | 1.1 | (1) | |||||||||||||||||||
Customer, Field and Service | 10.0% | 10.0% | 0.0% | 10.0% | ||||||||||||||||||
● Achieve 5 growth and efficiency metrics at 8 key accounts | ● Achieved targeted growth and efficiency metrics at key accounts | 1.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||
● Improve win rate of prioritized opportunities by customer | ● Exceeded targets for prioritized opportunities | 1.5 | ||||||||||||||||||||
People and Organization | 10.0% | 6.0% | 10.0% | 10.0% | ||||||||||||||||||
● Improve priority practices and overall employee engagement score relative to 2016 OHI survey results, measured by survey administered by McKinsey | ● Increased priority practices scores on average of 3.6 points and overall employee engagement score by 2.7 points | 1.5 | ||||||||||||||||||||
● Implement next phase of employee development and training strategies | ● Updated integrated training curriculum and trained over 90% of the targeted population | 2.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Goals tied to objective and quantifiable metrics |
| |||||||||||||||||||||
(1) Reflects weighted average of the scores of multiple underlying goals.
| Weightings | Achievements | Score | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Objectives | Dickerson and Durn | Salehpour | Raja | Ghanayem | ||||||||||||||||||
| Financial and Market Performance and Execution | 50.0% | 47.5% | 50.0% | 40.0% | ||||||||||||||||||
● Grow wafer fabrication equipment (measured by Gartner) market share | ● Expecting growth in wafer fabrication equipment market share but below the aggressive targeted share increase in calendar 2019 | 0.5 | ||||||||||||||||||||
● Achieve adjusted gross margin targets (gross margin reported externally) | ● Delivered 44.0%non-GAAP adjusted gross margin, but below the aggressive targets set for the year | 0.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||
● Achieve adjusted operating margin goal (operating margin reported externally) | ● Achieved 23.5%non-GAAP adjusted operating margin, narrowly missing the aggressive targets set for the year | 0.5 | ||||||||||||||||||||
● Achieve TSR target relative to peers | ● Achieved targeted TSR performance relative to semiconductor equipment peer group | 1.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||
●Improve operational, quality and safety performance | ● Successfully drove improvements in delivery times, materials costs, quality and safety | 1.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Products and Growth | 30.0% | 37.5% | 25.0% | 42.5% | ||||||||||||||||||
● Demonstrate progress towards ability to deliver targeted fiscal 2023 revenue for semiconductor businesses | ● Met aggressive milestones towards delivering 2023 revenue target for semiconductor businesses | 1.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||
● Demonstrate progress towards ability to deliver targeted fiscal 2023 revenue for Display business | ● Made significant progress towards delivering 2023 revenue target for Display business but some results were below the aggressive goals set for the year | 0.5 | ||||||||||||||||||||
● Grow Service revenue per target | ● Delivered record Service revenue but fell short of the aggressive service revenue growth target for the year | 0.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||
● Develop growth pipeline to deliver targeted fiscal 2021 revenue and create opportunities in core and new businesses | ● Developed strong pipeline of opportunities to drive significant future growth but fell slightly short of aggressive targets | 0.5 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Customers and Field | 12.5% | 7.5% | 17.5% | 10.0% | ||||||||||||||||||
● Achieve growth and efficiency metrics at key accounts | ● Achieved aggressive field management goals at the majority of, but not all, key accounts | 0.5 | ||||||||||||||||||||
●Win development tool of record and production tool of record positions at key customers; grow target applications for systems and service | ● Delivered many development tool of record and production tool of record positions, which set us up well for the future, but below the aggressive targets set for the year. Achieved many significant milestones for application growth for systems and service, but below the aggressive targeted goals for the year | 0.5 | ||||||||||||||||||||
●Validate Preferred Strategic Partner customer engagements worth targeted fiscal 2023 revenue that create value for customers and meaningfully expand systems and service business | ● The Preferred Strategic Partner goal is set as a multiple year objective to go far beyond our existing customer relationships. In 2019, we achieved many milestones for Preferred Strategic Partner engagements, however, fell short of some aggressive targets set for the year | 0.5 | ||||||||||||||||||||
32 20182020 Proxy Statement
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
| Weightings | Achievements | Score | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Objectives | Dickerson and Durn | Salehpour | Raja | Ghanayem | ||||||||||||||||||
People and Organization | 7.5% | 7.5% | 7.5% | 7.5% | ||||||||||||||||||
● Improve overall health score and employee engagement score relative to 2018 organizational health index survey results | ● Despite both a challenging business climate and robust talent market, in 2019, we achieved the same overall health score and employee engagement score as the previous year | 0.5 | ||||||||||||||||||||
● Accelerate diversity and inclusion initiative by increasing targeted representation of women and underrepresented minorities, improving culture of inclusion and setting goals, plans and scoring matrices for certain business and functional organizations | ● Formed fully-dedicated team to support work in designing a culture of inclusion, which is a catalyst to accelerate progress toward increasing diversity in the workforce. Established Culture of Inclusion Framework and inclusion strategy to include innovative approaches with intentional focus on leadership, eliminating systematic barriers and fostering engagement | 0.5 | ||||||||||||||||||||
● Implement next phase of organizational development strategy | ● Drove organizational development by ensuring that 89% of regular full-time employees had development objectives in Workday by end of Q2 and employees participating in training PATHWAY completed 89% of all assigned training by end of fiscal 2019 | 1.5 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Goals tied to objective and quantifiable metrics aligned with Company strategy
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Individual Performance Factor. The HRCC also considered the individual performance of each NEO as indicated by that NEO’s individual performance factor (“IPF”). The IPF applied only if the initial performance goalfunding threshold and at least some of the corporate scorecard objectives were achieved. The IPF modified the initial bonus amount as determined based on achievement against the corporate scorecard objectives. The IPF modifier ranges from 0 to 1.5.
The HRCC determined the IPFs for all NEOs. Mr. Dickerson’s IPF was basedIn determining the IPFs, the HRCC took into consideration: (i) financial performance, which came in near threshold performance on EPS, (ii) results of the HRCC’syear-end assessment of his
leadershipcorporate scorecard and the Company’s overallassociated goals, (iii) performance during the year. second half of the fiscal year, which was considered to be very strong given the reduction in WFE market size seen in the first two quarters of the year, and (iv) TSR performance, which increased materially from the end of fiscal 2018 through to the end of fiscal 2019.
The HRCC determined the IPF for each NEO, other NEOthan Mr. Dickerson, by taking into consideration Mr. Dickerson’s recommendation, which included his assessment of the achievement of strategic, financial, operational and organizational performance goals specific to the business or organizational unit for which the NEO was responsible, as well as the NEO’s leadership skills and current and expected contributions to the business.
For fiscal 2017,2019, in light of the significant efforts by each NEO in leading his respective organization, and in Mr. Dickerson’s case, Applied, and in recognition of the significant teamwork required of the leadership team to deliver solid financial results despite challenging market conditions, the HRCC determined that Mr. Dickerson’s individual performance aligned with the majority of his leadership team at 1.0, and assigned each NEO an IPF of 1.10.1.0, with the exception of Mr. Durn, who was assigned an IPF of 1.25, as recommended by Mr. Dickerson. Mr. Durn’s IPF was in recognition of his above and beyond performance in successfully managing external investor relationships and communications and his vision and execution in driving major improvements in efficiency and effectiveness across the Finance organization.
Applied Materials, Inc. 33
The following table shows the highlights of each NEO’s performance in fiscal 20172019 that the HRCC considered in determining their respective IPFs.
| NEO |
Fiscal | |||
Gary E. Dickerson | ● | Delivered annual revenue of $14.6 billion and | ||
● | ||||
| ● | |||
| ||||
● | Successfully | |||
● | Drove major improvements in efficiency and effectiveness across the | |||
Ali Salehpour | ● | Delivered | ||
● | Increased the number of installed base tools covered by long-term service agreement by approximately 30% since 2017 | |||
● | Delivered | |||
Prabu G. Raja | ● | Delivered Semiconductor Systems revenues of $9.0 billion | ||
● | ||||
|
| |||
● | ||||
| ● | |||
● | ||||
Applied Materials, Inc. 33
Actual Bonus Payouts. The NEOs’ performance against corporate scorecard goals and IPF ratings resulted in an average bonus payout of 1.34 of target bonus. The diagram below shows the results for each of the three key steps in determining the NEOs’ fiscal 20172019 annual incentive bonuses. Despite achieving solid financial performance and many of our fiscal 2019 corporate scorecard objectives, there were certain important scorecard areas where we did not reach the targets set at the beginning of the year, which reduced bonus payouts for our NEOs by, on average, 41% from target bonus amounts.
Fiscal 20172019 Annual Incentive Calculation
Performance Measures | Fiscal | |||||||
Initial Performance Goal | ∎ Fiscal | ✓Achievednon-GAAP adjusted EPS of
| ||||||
  Corporate Scorecard | ∎ Strong performance on core objectives: – Financial and Market Performance and Execution – Products and Growth –
– People and Organization
| ✓NEO scorecard resultsachieved in a range from
| ||||||
Individual Performance Modifier | ∎
| ✓IPFachieved at
| ||||||
  | ||||||||
Average NEO bonus, as
| ||||||||
34 2020 Proxy Statement
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
The following table shows for each NEO: (1) the maximum amount payable under the Bonus Plan, (2) the target bonus amountsamount expressed as a percentage of base salary, (3) the target bonus expressed as a dollar amount and (4) the actual fiscal 20172019 bonus amount approved by the HRCC and paid to the NEO.
| NEO | (1) Maximum Bonus Payable ($) | (2) Target Salary (%) | (3) Target Bonus ($) | (4) Actual Bonus ($) | ||||||||||
Dickerson | $ | 5,000,000 | 200% | $ | 2,000,000 | $ | 2,640,000 | |||||||
Durn | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||
Halliday | $ | 2,531,250 | 135% | $ | 843,750 | $ | 1,113,750 | |||||||
Salehpour | $ | 2,430,000 | 135% | $ | 810,000 | $ | 1,060,290 | |||||||
Nalamasu | $ | 1,617,000 | 110% | $ | 539,000 | $ | 770,770 | |||||||
Larkins | $ | 1,584,000 | 110% | $ | 528,000 | $ | 702,768 | |||||||
34 2018 Proxy Statement
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
| NEO | (1) Maximum Bonus Payable ($) | (2) Target Salary (%) | (3) Target Bonus ($) | (4) Actual Bonus ($) | ||||||||
Gary E. Dickerson | $5,000,000 | 200% | $ | 2,060,000 |
| $ | 1,133,000 |
| ||||
Daniel J. Durn | $2,531,250 | 135% | $ | 843,750 |
| $ | 580,078 |
| ||||
Ali Salehpour | $2,531,250 | 135% | $ | 843,750 |
| $ | 411,750 |
| ||||
Prabu G. Raja | $2,296,350 | 135% | $ | 765,450 |
| $ | 430,948 |
| ||||
Steve G. Ghanayem | $2,296,350 | 135% | $ | 765,450 |
| $ | 497,543 |
| ||||
Pay and Performance Alignment.Driven by Operating Performance. Our process for determining annual bonus awards has resulted in strong pay and performance alignment. Despite achieving solid financial performance and many of the fiscal 2019 corporate scorecard objectives that position Applied for strong longer-term growth, there were certain important scorecard areas where we did not reach the aggressive targets set at the beginning of the year, which resulted in a lower bonus payout for our CEO than for fiscal 2018. The chart below illustrates the rigor of our scorecard and alignment betweenshows the actual annual bonus awards forto our CEO and ournon-GAAP adjusted EPS achievements.achievements over the last five fiscal years.
CEO Actual Annual Bonus vs. Earnings Per Share
Actual Annual Bonus Non-GAAP Adjusted Earnings Per Share Non-GAAP Adjusted Earnings Per Share Actual Annual Bonus ($ millions)
Non-GAAP adjusted EPS is a performance target under our bonus plan. See Appendix A fornon-GAAP reconciliations.
Long-Term Incentives
Overview. Applied’s long-term incentive compensation program is intended to help (1) achieve our business objectives, (2) attract, motivate and retain key talent, and (3) align our executives’ interests with shareholders’ interests to maximize long-term shareholder value.
Timing of Awards. The HRCC grants equity and other long-term incentive awards to NEOs under our shareholder-approvedshareholder-
approved Employee Stock Incentive Plan (the “Stock Plan”). The HRCC has not granted, nor does it intend to grant, equity awards in anticipation of the release of material, nonpublic information that is likely to result in changes to the price of our common stock, such as a significant positive or negative earnings announcement. Similarly, Applied has not timed, nor does it intend to time, the release of material, nonpublic information based on equity award grant dates.
Applied Materials, Inc. 35
Payout of Fiscal 2017 Performance Share Unit Awards
The performance share units (“PSUs”) granted to our NEOs in fiscal 2017 were scheduled to vest three years from the grant date based on achievement of averagenon-GAAP adjusted operating margin for fiscal 2017 through fiscal 2019 and average WFE market share for calendar years 2016 through 2018, with equal weighting given to each metric. In setting targets for the PSUs, the HRCC considered a number of factors, including the Company’s past performance, analyst expectations, current and expected macro-economic forces, the spectrum of potential outcomes, and competitor positioning. The number of PSUs that may vest was based on the achievement of threshold (minimum required for a payout), target or maximum levels of each metric and may range from 50% to 200% of the target number of shares. The threshold, target and maximum levels and actual achievement for each metric, as well as overall payout for the fiscal 2017 PSUs, are shown below.
Three-Year Average | ||||||||||||||||||||
Metric | Threshold | Target | Maximum | Result | Payout | |||||||||||||||
Operating Margin(1) |
| 19.3% |
|
| 21.3% |
|
| 25.1% |
|
| 26.8% |
|
| 200.0% |
| |||||
WFE Share |
| 18.4% |
|
| 20.4% |
|
| 25.5% |
|
| 20.9% |
|
| 111.0% |
| |||||
Total |
| 155.5% |
| |||||||||||||||||
| (1) | See Appendix A for a reconciliation ofnon-GAAP adjusted operating margin. |
The payout of the fiscal 2017 PSUs for each NEO is shown below.
| NEO | | Target Number of PSUs | | Number of PSUs Earned | ||||
Dickerson |
| 280,316 |
|
| 435,892 |
| ||
Durn |
| 33,535 | (1) |
| 52,147 |
| ||
Salehpour |
| 66,466 |
|
| 103,324 |
| ||
Raja |
| 51,911 |
|
| 80,722 |
| ||
Ghanayem |
| 51,911 |
|
| 80,722 |
|
| (1) | Mr. Durn’s PSU award waspro-rated based on his hire date of August 2017. |
Fiscal 20172019 Equity Awards
The HRCC oversawbelieves that a comprehensive reviewmeaningful portion of ourNEOs’ target compensation programsshould be in 2016the form of long-term incentives. These awards are intended to ensure that they continue toreward performance over a multi-year period, align our management team with the interests of ourexecutives with those of shareholders, incentivize actions that will drive profitableinstill an ownership culture, enhance the personal stake of executive officers in the growth and attractsuccess of the Company, and retain top talent in a highly competitive industry. As a result of this review, and feedbackprovide an incentive for continued service at the Company.
Given the strong support received from our shareholders on our incentive programs last year, we continued our approach to make performance-based equity awards a substantial portion of the HRCC approved changesoverall value of equity awards granted to our long-term incentive program with the goals of increasing differentiation for high performance, balancing long-term and short-term incentives, and simplifying our long-term incentive plan.NEOs
Beginning in fiscal 2017, theThe long-term incentive awards for NEOs consist of two forms of equity: performance share units (“PSUs”)equity vehicles: PSUs and restricted stock units (“RSUs”). The target vehicle mix of the awards for the fiscal 2019 grant remains unchanged from the previous year’s grants and consists of 75% PSUs and 25% RSUs for the CEO and 50% PSUs and 50% RSUs for the other NEOs.
Applied Materials, Inc. 35
The HRCC believes that this new long-term incentive structure establishes a closer direct link to long-term company performance through the PSUs and will also provide a crucial retention value through the RSUs.
| CEO LTI Vehicle Mix | All Other NEO LTI Vehicle Mix | |
| 
| |
For fiscal 2017,2019, in December 2016,2018, the HRCC granted the number of PSUs and RSUs listed in the below table to our NEOs. Mr. Durn is not included in the table below as he received his awards at the time he joined in Applied in August 2017.
| NEO | | Total Value of Awards(1) ($) |
| | Equivalent Target Number of PSUs(2) | | Equivalent Number of RSUs(2) | | Target Value of Awards(1) ($) |
| | Equivalent Target Number of PSUs(2) | | Equivalent Number of RSUs(2) | ||||||||||
Dickerson | $ | 11,250,000 | 280,316 | 93,439 | $ | 11,845,000 |
|
| 256,090 |
|
| 85,364 |
| |||||||||||
Halliday | $ | 4,375,000 | 72,675 | 72,675 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Durn | $ | 4,025,000 |
|
| 58,014 |
|
| 58,014 |
| |||||||||||||||
Salehpour | $ | 4,000,000 | 66,446 | 66,446 | $ | 4,025,000 |
|
| 58,014 |
|
| 58,014 |
| |||||||||||
Nalamasu | $ | 2,250,000 | 37,376 | 37,376 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Larkins | $ | 2,250,000 | 37,376 | 37,376 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Raja | $ | 2,961,250 |
|
| 42,682 |
|
| 42,682 |
| |||||||||||||||
Ghanayem | $ | 2,961,250 |
|
| 42,682 |
|
| 42,682 |
| |||||||||||||||
| (1) | Value of awards is based on Applied’s stock price on the grant date. Amounts shown in the “Stock Awards” column of the Summary Compensation Table represent grant date fair value determined pursuant to Accounting Standards Codification 718. |
| (2) | Number of shares calculated by dividing value of awards by |
Size of Performance-Based Equity Awards. In determining the size of the awards, the HRCC considered each NEO’s award as a component of his total direct compensation. Target fiscal 20172019 long-term equity awards were determined in light of each NEO’s scope of responsibility, performance, impact on results and expected future contributions to our business, compensation levels relative to other Applied officers, the wholesale changes made to the long-term incentive program and establishment of three-year performance goals, the need to attract and retain talent, and
business conditions. In addition, the fiscal 20172019 target grantaward sizes provided sufficient performance-based equity incentives to
36 2020 Proxy Statement
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
align compensation with the long-term interests of our shareholders, were in line with market norms for the NEOs’ respective roles and were sufficient to provide incentive for them.
Performance Share Units. The long-term incentive program was entirely redesignedis designed to provide for longer performance measurement periods and alignment ofalign performance metrics with our strategic goals.goals over a three-year performance period. Based on discussions with our shareholders, the ongoing examination of the effectiveness of the program across the entire enterprise, and considering simplicity and consistency, for the fiscal 2019 grant, the HRCC approved changing one of the two metrics of the PSU portion of the long-term incentive program. The first metric, three-year average operating margin, remains unchanged from previous year’s grants. The second performance metric, beginning with the fiscal 2019 grant, is relative TSR performance measured against the S&P 500 Index over the three-year performance period. Given the continued evolution of the Company’s business, including the increase in the portions of the business outside of WFE, the HRCC approved eliminating the WFE metric in the PSUs in favor of relative TSR, which applies across the entire enterprise. The HRCC has maintained these two metrics in the long-term incentive program design for fiscal 2020.
The fiscal 2019 PSUs, granted in December 2018, will vest three years from the grant date based on achievement of averagenon-GAAP adjusted operating margin for fiscal 20172019 through fiscal 2021 and TSR relative to the S&P 500 over the performance period of November 2019 and average WFE market share goals for calendar years 2016 through 2018,October 2021, with equal weighting given to each metric.
FY19 Long-Term Incentive Plan Metrics 50% Relative TSR-3-year Average Captures the full scale of our business and greater incentivizes management to outperform the market through each business environment. 50% Non-GAAP Adjusted Operating Profit Margin-3-year Average Reflects an important measure of profitability, value creation, and the ability of management to improve operational efficiency over time. It is also a key metric for our shareholders.
The number of PSUs that may vest is based on the achievement of threshold (minimum required for a payout), target or maximum levels of each metric and may range from 50% to 200% of the target number of shares, as set forth below.
| Achievement Level | | Percentage of Shares That Vest | | |
Threshold | 50% | |||
Target | 100% | |||
Maximum | 200% |
A TSR payout factor will be determined by calculating the Company’s TSR percentile rank within the S&P 500, with threshold, target and maximum levels based on Applied’s TSR ranking of above the 25th, 50th and 75th percentile, respectively, of the S&P 500. The TSR calculation uses a60-day average stock price at the beginning and end of the performance period for measurement purposes. This approach minimizes the impact of a single beginning and ending point stock price for each performance cycle.
If the threshold level is not achieved, then no shares will vest. If achievement falls between threshold, target or maximum levels, the portion of the award that may vest will be determined based on straight-line interpolation.
In setting goals for the PSUs, the HRCC considered Applied’s historical results and relative performance and established goals that are aligned with Applied’s financial and strategic objectives and will require significant effort to achieve the maximum level.
The HRCC also approved retirement provisions applicable to long-term incentive awards, beginning with fiscal 2019 awards. The provisions, which became effective in January 2020, provide for a partial payout of PSU awards based on actual performance at the conclusion of the three-year performance period and partial accelerated vesting of RSU awards in the event of a qualifying retirement based on age and years of service. The provisions establish a consistent retirement policy for the executive team reporting to the CEO and are designed to maintain engagement and focus, as well as provide retention incentive, for our executive officers as some approach potential retirement decisions.
36 2018 Proxy Statement
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Restricted Stock Units.The RSU awards are scheduled to vest ratably over three years, providing a link to shareholder value creation and maintaining retention value.
New CFO Equity Awards and Compensation Package.In connection with Mr. Durn’s hire, the HRCC granted him the following equity awards 30 days after his start date:(1) new-hire RSUs with a value of $2,500,000, scheduled to vest ratably over three years and subject to acceleration of vesting in the event that Applied terminates Mr. Durn without cause before February 2020; (2) PSUs with a target value of $1,500,000, scheduled to vest in December 2019, subject to achievement of the same goals as the fiscal 2017 PSU awards for our other NEOs – three-year average WFE share and three-year averagenon-GAAP adjusted operating margin goals; and (3) RSUs with a value of $1,500,000, scheduled to vest in three equal installments through 2019. The number of RSUs or PSUs granted was determined by dividing the stated value of the award by $44.73, the closing price of Applied stock on September 6, 2017, the grant date.
In addition, Mr. Durn’snew-hire compensation included an initial annual base salary of $600,000 and a target bonus of 110% of his base salary under the Bonus Plan beginning in fiscal year 2018. As Mr. Durn’s employment occurred after the eligibility date for a 2017 bonus award under the Bonus Plan, he was awarded a special bonus of $250,000 to be paid six months following his start date, subject to continued employment. Mr. Durn also received a $500,000sign-on bonus 30 days after his start date. In the event that Mr. Durn resigns or Applied terminates his employment for cause prior to the completion of 24 months of service, Mr. Durn is obligated to repay the full amount of thesign-on bonus, less any amounts withheld by Applied for taxes. Mr. Durn also received relocation benefits under Applied’s standard relocation policy.
In developing a compensation package for Mr. Durn, the HRCC considered his experience and expected future contributions to Applied, as well as compensation levels at our peer companies for the CFO position. The HRCC also considered the associatedone-time costs of replacing compensation value that Mr. Durn forfeited by leaving his previous employer.
Role and Authority of the Human Resources and Compensation Committee
The HRCC has a written charter approved by the Board that specifies the HRCC’s duties and responsibilities, which is available on our website at:http://www.appliedmaterials.com/company/investor-relations/governance-documentsfiles/hrcc_charter.pdf. In accordance with its charter, the HRCC oversees our programs that foster executive and employee development and retention, with emphasis on leadership development, management capabilities, succession plans and succession plans.human capital management. The HRCC also determines executive and director
compensation, and oversees significant employee benefits programs, policies and plans.
Each member of the HRCC has been determined to be independent under Nasdaq SEC and Internal Revenue CodeSEC rules. The HRCC may delegate any of its responsibilities to subcommittees. See “Board Meetings and Committees” on page 14 for more information about the HRCC.
Applied Materials, Inc. 37
Role of Compensation Consultant
The HRCC has the authority to engage independent advisors to assist it in carrying out its responsibilities. During 2017,For fiscal 2019, the HRCC determined that, since it had engaged Semler Brossy Consulting Group (“Semler Brossy”) as its independent executive compensation consultant since 2008, it was appropriate to initiate a request for proposal (“RFP”) process for independent compensation consultant services. The purpose of the RFP was to ensure that the HRCC continues to receive comprehensive, expert consultant services and recommendations that reinforce the Company’s business strategy. Our current consultant, Semler Brossy, was invited to respond to the RFP, as were several other companies which provide independent compensation consultant services. After a thorough interview process with the candidates, the HRCC renewed its engagement with Semler Brossy for independent compensation consultant services in 2017.
consultant. Semler Brossy, who reports directly to the HRCC and not to management, is independent from Applied, has not provided any services to Applied other than to the HRCC and receives compensation from Applied only for services provided to the HRCC. The HRCC assessed the independence of Semler Brossy pursuant to SEC rules and concluded that the work of Semler Brossy for the HRCC has not raised any conflict of interest.
Semler Brossy reviews and advises on all principal aspects of the executive compensation program. Its main responsibilities are as follows:
| ● | Advise on alignment of pay and performance; |
| ● | Review and advise on executive total compensation, including base salaries, short- and long-term incentives, associated performance goals, and retention and severance arrangements; |
| ● | Advise on trends in executive compensation; |
| ● | Provide recommendations regarding the composition of our peer group; |
| ● | Analyze peer group proxy statements, compensation survey data and other publicly available data; and |
| ● | Perform any special projects requested by the HRCC. |
Applied Materials, Inc. 37
The HRCC typically asks Semler Brossy to attend the HRCC’s meetings, including executive sessions at which management is not present. Semler Brossy communicates regularly with the HRCC Chair outside of committee meetings and also meets with management to gather information and review proposals.
Role of Executive Officers and Management in Compensation Decisions
ForIn fiscal 2017,2019, the HRCC invited Mr. Dickerson (as CEO) and other executives, including the heads of Global Human Resources and Global Rewards, to attend its meetings. The
HRCC also regularly held executive sessions without management present. The CEO, together with the HRCC, assesses the performance of our NEOs and other executive officers. The CEO presents to the HRCC his evaluation of each executive officer’s performance over the past year and makes recommendations to the HRCC regarding base salaries, bonus targets and actual payments, performance goals and weightings, and long-term incentive awards for executive officers. The HRCC considers these recommendations in making its final determinations, in addition to considering input from Semler Brossy. The HRCC discusses the CEO’s proposed compensation and makes final decisions regarding the CEO’s compensation when he is not present.
Additional Compensation Programs and Policies
Non-QualifiedDeferred Compensation Plan
Our 2016 Deferred Compensation Plan (the “DCP”) allows our NEOs and other eligible employees to voluntarily defer on apre-tax basis a portion of their eligible earnings. We do not provide matching or other employer contributions to our executive officers under this plan. Deferrals made prior to October 2015 under the DCP are credited with deemed interest and are subject to the distribution rules in place prior to the plan amendment in October 2015. Beginning in fiscal 2016, participants are permitted to notionally invest new deferrals in certain investment options newly available under the plan. Additionally, for new deferrals, the DCP provides new distribution rules forin-service distributions and upon a qualifying separation from service, disability and change in control. See “Nonqualified Deferred Compensation” below for more information about the DCP.
Retirement Benefits under the 401(k) Plan and Generally Available Benefits Programs
During fiscal 2017,2019, all full-time and part-time (working 20 or more hours a week) U.S. employees, including the NEOs, were eligible to participate in Applied’s 401(k) plan, atax-qualified retirement plan. Eligible Applied 401(k) plan participants receive matching contributions from Applied. Other than the 401(k) plan, we do not provide defined benefit pension plans or defined contribution retirement plans to the NEOs or other employees, except as required in certain countries outside the U.S. for legal or competitive reasons. Applied offers a number of other benefits programs to a broad base of eligible employees, including atax-qualified employee stock purchase plan, medical, dental and vision insurance, long-term and short-term disability plans, life and accidental death and dismemberment plans, health and dependent care flexible spending accounts, business travel insurance, wellness programs, educational assistance, employee assistance program and certain other country- specificcountry-specific benefits.
38 2020 Proxy Statement
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Applied annually benchmarks its overall benefits programs, including the 401(k) plan, against those of our peers. Applied’s overall broad-based benefits programs are at approximately the market median, which the HRCC believes allows us to remain competitive in attracting and retaining talent.
The benefits provided under the programs discussed above are not considered by the HRCC in determining an individual NEO’s total compensation.
Relocation Program
Applied maintains a relocation program available to all eligible employees that is consistent with current practices among global companies. The program is available to all eligible employees. Applied provides competitive relocation benefits to ensure it can fill positions critical to its business needs and provide career development opportunities for high-potential employees. Benefits for employees on international assignment include reimbursement on anafter-tax basis for housing and transportation allowances and living and travel expense reimbursements. Benefits also include tax equalization that is intended to put employees who relocate in service to Applied in the same position, from atax-liability perspective, that they would be in if they were still located in the U.S.
In 2014, at the Board requested thatBoard’s request, Mr. Dickerson relocate full-timerelocated with his family to Japan to continue leading critical efforts toward the then-anticipated completion of a proposed business combination with Tokyo Electron.Electron Limited.
Board Rationale for Relocation. Recognizing the complexity of a U.S.-Japanese merger, including both geographic and cultural differences, the Board felt strongly that to effect a smooth business combination and increase the likelihood of achieving forecasted business benefits of the merger, it was critical to have senior leadership presence from Applied on the ground in Japan to work closely with Tokyo Electron during the regulatory review period.period and to effect a smooth business combination and increase the likelihood of achieving forecasted business benefits of the merger. The Board considered and determined that the anticipated cost savings that would be generated from the merger would significantly outweigh
38 2018 Proxy Statement
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
the expenses to relocate our senior management to Japan. At the Board’s request, Mr. Dickerson relocated withand his family to Japan in August 2014.Japan.
Relocation Benefits. In accordance with our relocation program that is available to all employees on global assignment, the HRCC approved relocation benefits for Mr. Dickerson, which are reported in the Summary Compensation Table. The relocation benefits were provided to Mr. Dickerson under the relocation program that is available to all employees on global assignment. These benefits included housing, transportation and moving expenses, a cost of living adjustment, education expense reimbursements, relocation allowance, amounts for taxes incurred in connection with the relocation, as well as tax equalization for the incrementaltax-liability resulting from his relocation to Japan in service of Applied.
Tax equalization ensures that the tax costs incurred by Mr. Dickerson on the international assignment be equivalent to what the tax costs would have been had he remained in the U.S. Tax payments were not paid to Mr. Dickerson but
were paid directly to the appropriate tax authorities. While the amounts of the relocation benefits are attributed to Mr. Dickerson in the Summary Compensation Table, they did not provide any additional compensation to him and are not part of his ongoing pay.
Disclosure and Payment Timing. Although Mr. Dickerson relocated to Japan for part of 2014 and 2015, the timing and disclosure of relocation payments extend beyond this period. Mr. Dickerson is subject to income taxes in Japan on income earned for the period of time of his international assignment, including continuing Japanese tax liabilities related to his equity awards. Japan assesses income tax on compensation earned while an individual is resident in Japan. Performance shares are deemed earned over the period during which they vest and stock options are deemed earned from grant to exercise. Mr. Dickerson has outstanding equity awards that he earned during the period of his international assignment in Japan. Applied, in connection with providing tax equalization benefits to Mr. Dickerson under the relocation program, will beis responsible for incremental taxes onin connection with the equity awards as they continue to vest through fiscal 2019.vesting of performance shares and the stock option award upon its exercise.
Stock Ownership Guidelines
We have stock ownership guidelines to help align the interests of our NEOs with those of our shareholders. In fiscal 2017, the HRCC approved changes to our stock ownership guidelines to increase the CEO ownership level from 5x to 6x of his annual base salary and apply the guidelines to all Section 16 officers on the CEO Executive Staff.Staff with those of our shareholders. The guidelines provide that officers should meet the following ownership levels in Applied common stock:
Position | Ownership Level | |||
CEO | 6x base salary | |||
Other Officers | 3x base salary | |||
As of December 31, 2017, all NEOs had met2019, each officer was in compliance with the stock ownership guidelines.
Hedging and Pledging Prohibitions
Applied has an insider trading policy that, among other things, prohibits all of our NEOsemployees (including officers) and directors from engaging in hedging or other speculative transactions relating to Applied shares,shares. Prohibited transactions include short sales, derivative securities (such as put and call options, or other similar instruments) and other hedging transactions (such as equity swaps, prepaid variable forwards, or similar instruments), or any transactions that have or are designed to have the effect of hedging or offsetting any decrease in the market value of Applied securities. In addition, Section 16 officers and directors are prohibited from holding Applied securities in a margin account or otherwise pledging their Applied shares.securities as collateral for a loan.
Applied Materials, Inc. 39
Clawback Policy
We have a “clawback” policy that allows the Board to require reimbursement of incentive compensation from an executive officer in the event intentional misconduct by the officer is determined to be the primary cause of a material negative restatement of Applied’s financial results. The compensation that may be recovered is theafter-tax portion of any bonus paid to, and any performance-based equity awards earned by, the NEO within the 12 months after filing of the financial statements, if the compensation would not have been paid to the NEO had Applied’s financial results been reported properly. The policy applies to financial statements filed in a rolling three-year, look-back period. This clawback policy is in addition to any policies or recovery rights that are required under applicable laws, including the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the Dodd-Frank Act.
Tax Deductibility
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, as amended by the recently-exacted Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, restricts deductibility for federal income tax purposes of annual individual compensation in excess of $1 million to the NEOs,each NEO, effective for tax years beginning after 2017, subject to a transition rule for certain written binding contracts which were in effect on November 2, 2017, and which were not modified in any material respect on or after such date. In the past, Section 162(m)’s deductibility limitation was subject to an exception for compensation that qualified as ‘performance-based’. Our compensation programs were designed to permit Applied to qualify for the performance-based exception, although the Company reserved the right to pay compensation that did not qualify as ‘performance-based’. While the HRCC has consideredwill continue to consider the deductibility of compensation as a factor in making compensation decisions, it has retainedretains the flexibility to provide compensation that is consistent with the Company’s goals for its executive compensation program, even if such compensation would not be fullytax-deductible. The HRCC is continuing to assess the impact of Section 162(m) of the Code, as amended, on our compensation programs.
Applied Materials, Inc. 39
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT
The information contained in this report shall not be deemed to be “soliciting material” or “filed” with the SEC or subject to the liabilities of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, except to the extent that Applied specifically incorporates it by reference into a document filed under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), or the Exchange Act.
The Human Resources and Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed with management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis for fiscal 2017.2019. Based on the review and discussions, the Human Resources and Compensation
Committee recommended to the Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in Applied’s Proxy Statement for its 20182020 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.
This report is submitted by the Human Resources and Compensation Committee.
Thomas J. Iannotti (Chair)
Xun (Eric) Chen
Alexander A. Karsner
40 20182020 Proxy Statement
Summary Compensation Table for Fiscal 2017, 20162019, 2018 and 20152017
The following table shows compensation information for fiscal 2017, 20162019, 2018 and 20152017 for our NEOs.
Name and Principal Position | Year | Salary | Bonus | Stock | Non-Equity | All Other | Total ($) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gary E. Dickerson |
|
| 2019 2018 2017 |
|
| 1,024,808 1,000,000 1,000,000 |
|
| — — — |
|
| 11,696,506 11,261,311 10,844,501 |
|
|
1,133,000 1,430,000 2,640,000 |
|
373,229 838,204 | (4) | | 14,072,395 14,064,540 15,322,705 |
| ||||||||||||||||
Daniel J. Durn |
|
| 2019 2018 2017 |
|
| 620,673 600,000 138,462 |
| —
500,000
|
|
| 3,931,029 5,329,659 5,421,909 |
| 580,078 471,900 —
|
|
| 13,620 23,252 411,239 | (6) | 5,145,400 6,674,811 6,471,610 |
| ||||||||||||||||||
Ali Salehpour |
| 2019 2018 2017 |
|
|
| 620,673 600,000 591,346 |
|
| — — — |
|
| 3,931,029 3,610,485 3,868,486 |
|
| 411,750 588,060 1,060,290 |
|
15,824 12,058 | (7) | | 4,976,182 4,814,369 5,532,180 |
| ||||||||||||||||
Prabu G. Raja(8) |
| 2019 2018 2017 |
|
|
564,058 549,039 — |
|
| — — — |
|
| 2,892,132 4,784,842 — |
|
| 430,948 522,720 — |
|
13,923 — | (9) | | 3,903,602 5,870,524 — |
| |||||||||||||||||
Steve G. Ghanayem(8) |
|
|
2018 2017 |
|
564,058 549,039 — |
|
| — — — |
|
| 2,892,132 4,784,842 — |
|
| 497,543 432,878 — |
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||
|
| 13,620 14,869 — |
|
|
|
|
| 3,967,353 5,781,628 — |
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
| (1) |
|
| Amount shown for Mr. Durn (a) for fiscal 2018 is a special bonus of $250,000, awarded to Mr. Durn in lieu of a fiscal 2017 bonus as his employment occurred after the eligibility date for a 2017 bonus award under the Senior Executive Bonus Plan, which bonus was paid six months following Mr. Durn’s start date and (b) for fiscal 2017 is anew-hire bonus of $500,000, |
Amounts shown do not reflect compensation actually received by the executive officer. Instead, the amounts reported represent the aggregate grant date fair value of target stock awards granted in the respective fiscal years, as determined pursuant to ASC 718 (but excluding the effect of estimated forfeitures for performance-based awards). For fiscal |
Amounts consist of bonuses earned under the Senior Executive Bonus Plan for services rendered in the respective fiscal years. |
Amount includes (a) Applied’s matching contribution of |
Mr. Durn was appointed CFO effective August 24, 2017. |
Amount consists of (a) Applied’s matching contribution of |
Applied Materials, Inc. 41
Amount consists of (a) Applied’s matching contribution of |
| (8) | Dr. Raja and Mr. Ghanayem were each designated an executive officer effective November 2017. |
| (9) | Amount consists of (a) Applied’s matching contribution of $12,569 under thetax-qualified 401(k) Plan, (b) Applied’s payment on behalf of Dr. Raja of $1,020 in term life insurance premiums, (c) a payment of $375 under Applied’s Patent Incentive Award Program and (d) Applied’s matching contribution of $2,500 pursuant to a program under the Applied Materials, Inc. Political Action Committee to an eligiblenon-profit organization. |
| (10) | Amount consists of (a) Applied’s matching contribution of $12,600 under thetax-qualified 401(k) Plan and (b) Applied’s payment on behalf of Mr. |
Applied Materials, Inc. 41
Grants of Plan-Based Awards for Fiscal 20172019
The following table shows all plan-based awards granted to the NEOs during fiscal 2017.2019.
Estimated Possible Payouts |
Estimated Future Payouts | All Other (#) | All Other | Exercise | Grant ($)(2) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Name | Grant Date | Threshold | Target ($) | Maximum | Threshold | Target (#) | Maximum | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gary E. Dickerson |
|
12/ 12/ — |
|
|
— — 0 |
|
|
|
|
— —
|
|
|
— — 5,000,000 |
|
|
— — |
|
|
— — |
|
|
— — |
|
|
—
— |
|
|
— — — |
|
|
| |||||||||||||
|
|
— — | —
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
2,828,109 —
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Daniel J. Durn |
|
12/6/2018 —
|
|
|
— —
|
|
|
— — 843,750 |
|
|
— — | 2,531,250
|
|
|
|
— — |
|
|
58,014 — —
|
|
|
116,028 — —
|
|
|
|
— 58,014 —
| ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
— —
|
|
|
— —
|
|
|
1,922,004 — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ali Salehpour | 12/6/2018 12/6/2018 — |
|
|
— — 0 |
|
|
— — 843,750 |
|
|
—
— 2,531,250 |
|
|
29,007 — —
|
|
|
58,014 — —
|
|
|
|
116,028 — —
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
— 58,014 —
|
|
|
— —
|
|
|
— — — |
|
|
1,922,004 — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prabu G. Raja | 12/6/2018 12/6/2018 — |
|
|
— — 0 |
|
|
—
— 765,450 |
|
|
— —
|
|
|
21,341 — —
|
|
|
|
42,682 — —
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
85,364 — —
|
|
|
|
|
— 42,682 —
|
|
|
— — — |
|
|
— — — |
|
|
1,414,055 — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Steve G. Ghanayem | 12/6/2018 12/6/2018 — |
|
|
—
— 0 |
|
|
— —
|
|
|
— —
|
|
|
— —
|
| 42,682 — — | 85,364 — — | — 42,682 — | — — — | — — — | 1,478,078 1,414,055 — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (1) | Amounts shown were estimated possible payouts for fiscal |
| (2) | Amounts shown do not reflect compensation actually received by the NEOs. Instead, the amounts represent the aggregate grant date fair value of the awards as determined pursuant to ASC 718 (but excluding the effect of estimated forfeitures for performance-based awards). The assumptions used to calculate the awards’ value are set forth in Note |
42 20182020 Proxy Statement
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal 20172019Year-End
The following table shows all outstanding equity awards held by the NEOs at the end of fiscal 2017.2019.
| Option Awards | Stock Awards(1) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Name | Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Exercisable | Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Unexercisable | Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Unearned Options (#) | Option Exercise Price ($) | Option Expiration Date | Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#) | Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested ($)(2) | Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested (#) | Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested ($)(2) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gary E. Dickerson | | 1,000,000 — — — — — | (3) | — — — — — — |
| | — — — — — — |
| | 15.06 — — — — — | 9/1/2020 — — — — — |
| | 178,478 31,147 37,355 85,364 — | (4) (5) (6) (7) | — 9,944,794 1,735,511 2,081,421 4,756,482 — | — — — — — 280,316 168,096 256,090 | (8) (9) (10) | — — — — — 15,619,208 9,366,309 14,269,335 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Daniel J. Durn | — — — — — — |
| | — — — — — |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| — —
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| — — — — |
| | — — — — — — |
| | — — — — — — |
| | 29,808 19,490 72,908 58,014 — — | (11) (12) (13) (14) | 1,660,902 1,085,983 4,062,434 3,232,540 — — | — — — — 33,535 29,235 58,014 | (15) (9) (10) | — — — — 1,868,570 1,628,974 3,232,540 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ali Salehpour | — — — — — — |
| | — — — — — — |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| — — — — — — |
| | — — — — — — |
| | —�� — — — — — | 49,578 22,149 23,908 58,014 — — | (4) (5) (16) (14) | 2,762,486 1,234,142 1,332,154 3,232,540 — — | — — — — 66,446 35,861 58,014 |
(17) (9) (10) | | — — — — 3,702,371 1,998,175 3,232,540 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prabu G. Raja | | — — — — — — |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| — — — — — — |
| | — — — — — — |
| |
| — — — — — — |
| | — — — — — — |
|
18,678 42,682 — |
(18) (19) (20)
| |
1,040,738 2,378,241 — |
| |
|
| — — — — — 51,911 28,016 42,682 |
(21) (9) (10) | — — — — — 2,892,481 1,561,052 2,378,241 |
| ||||||||||||||||
Steve G. Ghanayem | — — — — — — | — — — — — — | — — — — — — | — — — — — — | — — — — — — | 34,704 17,304 26,630 18,678 42,682 — | (4) (5) (18) (19) (20) | 1,933,707 964,179 1,483,824 1,040,738 2,378,241 — | — — — — — 51,911 28,016 42,682 | (21) (9) (10) | — — — — — 2,892,481 1,561,052 2,378,241 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (1) | Stock awards consist of restricted stock units, performance shares and PSUs, all of which will be converted into Applied common stock on aone-to-one basis upon vesting. All future vesting of shares is subject to the NEO’s continued employment with Applied through each applicable vest date. See“Long-Term Incentives”on page 35 for more information regarding these awards. |
| (2) | Market value was determined by multiplying the number of such shares by the closing price of Applied common stock of |
| (3) | Mr. Dickerson exercised this stock option in full on November 19, 2019. |
| (4) | Performance shares were granted on December |
| (5) | Restricted stock units were granted on December 1, 2016. These shares vested on December 19, 2019. |
| (6) | Restricted stock units were granted on December 14, 2017. Of these, 18,677 shares vested on December 19, 2019 and |
Restricted stock units were granted on December |
| (8) | PSUs were granted on December 1, 2016. These shares vested on December 19, 2019. On December |
Applied Materials, Inc. 43
PSUs were granted on December |
PSUs were granted on |
Restricted stock units were granted on |
| (12) | Restricted stock units were granted on December 14, 2017. Of these, 9,745 shares vested on December 19, 2019 and 9,745 shares are scheduled to vest on December 19, |
Restricted stock units were granted on October 19, 2018. Of these, 24,302 shares vested on November 1, 2019 and 24,303 shares are scheduled to vest on November 1 of each of 2020 and 2021. |
| (14) | Restricted stock units were granted on December |
| (15) | PSUs were granted on September 6, 2017. These shares vested on December 19, 2019. On December |
| (16) | Restricted stock units were granted on December 14, 2017. Of these, |
Applied Materials, Inc. 43
PSUs were granted on December 1, 2016. |
| (18) | Restricted stock units were granted on November 6, 2017. Of these, |
Restricted stock units were granted on December |
Restricted stock units were granted on December |
| (21) | PSUs were granted on December 1, 2016. These shares vested on December 19, 2019. On December |
Option Exercises and Stock Vested for Fiscal 20172019
The following table shows all stock awards that vested and the value realized upon vesting for each NEO during fiscal 2017.2019.
| Option Awards | Stock Awards | Option Awards | Stock Awards | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Name | Number of Shares Acquired on Exercise (#) | Value Realized on Exercise ($) | Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting (#)(1) | Value Realized on Vesting ($)(2) | Number of Shares Acquired on Exercise (#) | Value Realized on Exercise ($) | Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting (#)(1) | Value Realized on Vesting ($)(2) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gary E. Dickerson | — | — | 454,628 | 14,748,132 | — | — | 367,532 | 11,588,284 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Daniel J. Durn | — | — | — | — | — | — | 39,553 | 1,392,047 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Robert J. Halliday | — | — | 205,965 | 6,509,405 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ali Salehpour | — | — | 216,369 | 7,502,040 | — | — | 122,354 | 3,857,822 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Omkaram Nalamasu | — | — | 159,234 | 5,387,301 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Thomas F. Larkins | — | — | 113,500 | 3,681,940 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prabu G. Raja | — | — | 89,560 | 2,823,827 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Steve G. Ghanayem | — | — | 89,560 | 2,823,827 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (1) | Of the amounts shown in this column, Applied withheld the following number of shares to cover tax withholding obligations: |
| (2) | Value realized equals the fair market value of Applied common stock on the vesting date, multiplied by the number of shares that vested. |
44 2018 Proxy Statement
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation
Applied’s 2016 Deferred Compensation Plan (the “DCP”), restated effective October 12, 2015 (the “Restatement Date”) and formerly known as the 2005 Executive Deferred Compensation Plan, is anon-qualified deferred compensation plan that allows eligible employees, including executive officers, to voluntarily defer receipt of all or a portion of their: (1) eligiblesign-on bonus payments, if any, (2) up to 40% of their base salaries, (3) eligible sales incentive and annual
bonus payments, if any, and (4) eligible severance payments, if any.
Deferrals made prior to the Restatement Date are retained as separate “rollover” accounts under the DCP. These deferrals continue to be credited with deemed interest in the sum of (a) theyield-to-maturity of five-year U.S. Treasury notes, plus (b) 1.50%. The deemed interest rate under the DCP for fiscal 20172019 was 3.09%3.61% from October 31, 201629, 2018 to December 31, 2016
44 2020 Proxy Statement
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
2018 and 3.40%4.32% from January 1, 20172019 to October 29, 2017.27, 2019. Deferred amounts in the rollover accounts, plus deemed interest thereon, are generally payable on the same date
selected by the participants or specified prior to the Restatement Date under the terms of the DCP. Beginning in fiscal 2016, new deferrals under the DCP are credited with deemed investment returns, gains or losses based upon investment crediting options newly available under the DCP. Applied does not make any matching or other employer contributions to the plan.plan for our executive officers.
Under the DCP, a change in control (as defined prior to the Restatement Date), would trigger the distribution of all deferred balances in the rollover accounts. For new account balances after the Restatement Date, the DCP provides new distribution rules forin-service distribution options and upon a qualifying separation from service, disability and change in control, including the option to change the time and form of payment within three (3) months following a change in control, as such term is defined in the DCP. Distributions are payable from the general assets of Applied or from the assets of a grantor trust (known as a rabbi trust) established by Applied.
Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation for Fiscal 20172019
| Name | Executive ($) | Registrant ($) | Aggregate Earnings in Last Fiscal Year ($)(1) | Aggregate Withdrawals/ Distributions ($) | Aggregate Balance at Last Fiscal Year End ($) | Executive ($) | Registrant ($) | Aggregate Earnings in Last Fiscal Year ($)(1) | Aggregate Withdrawals/ Distributions ($) | Aggregate Balance at Last Fiscal Year End ($) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gary E. Dickerson | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Daniel J. Durn | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Robert J. Halliday | 1,234,955 | — | 268,059 | — | 1,722,811 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ali Salehpour | 1,089,307 | — | 147,052 | — | 1,759,518 | 809,949 | — | 497,826 | — | 4,340,268 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Omkaram Nalamasu | 765,452 | — | 121,787 | 184,729 | 2,310,399 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Thomas F. Larkins | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prabu G. Raja | 668,561 | — | 326,131 | — | 4,484,794 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Steve G. Ghanayem | 413,601 | — | 208,214 | — | 1,327,053 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (1) | There were no above-market or preferential earnings for fiscal |
Applied does not have employment agreements with any of its NEOs, other than an agreement with Mr. Dickerson. The agreement with Mr. Dickerson was entered into in connection with his appointment as President and CEO.
Mr. Dickerson’s employment agreement, dated August 14, 2013, provides that if Applied terminates his employment other than for cause and other than due to death or disability, he would be entitled to receive a lump sum payment equal to 275% of his base salary, provided that he executes an agreement containing a release of claims andnon-solicitation andnon-disparagement provisions in favor of Applied.
For purposes of Mr. Dickerson’s agreement, “cause” generally means the willful failure to perform his duties after written notice and an opportunity to cure; the willful commission of a wrongful act that caused, or was reasonably likely to cause, substantial damage to Applied, or an act of fraud in the performance of his duties; conviction for the commission of a felony in connection with the performance of his duties; or the order of a federal or state regulatory authority requiring the termination of his employment.
Applied Materials, Inc. 45
Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change of Control
Applied does not currently have change of control agreements or arrangements with any of its NEOs.
Potential Payments Upon Termination. Under Mr. Dickerson’s employment agreement described above, he would have been entitled to receive $2,750,000$2,832,500 (275% of his annual base salary at the end of fiscal 2017)2019) had Applied terminated his employment without cause on October 27, 2017,25, 2019, the last business day of fiscal 2017.2019. No other NEO was entitled to receive severance payment under an employment agreement in effect on October 27, 2017.25, 2019.
Vesting Acceleration under the Employee Stock Incentive Plan. Our Stock Plan provides that the vesting of equity awards granted under the plan to employees, including the NEOs, will be accelerated in full upon a change of control of Applied if the successor corporation (or its parent or subsidiary) does not assume or provide a substitute for the outstanding awards. Separately, equity awards will be accelerated in full if the award holder is terminated without cause or resigns employment with Applied for good reason, in each case, within 12 months following a change of control of Applied. This double-trigger accelerated vesting does not apply if the applicable award agreement specifically states
that it will not apply or if the participant’s employment is
terminated due to his or her death or disability, resignation without good reason or termination for cause.
The following table shows the amounts attributable to the accelerated vesting of equity awards under the Stock Plan following a change of control in which the awards are not assumed or substituted for, or within 12 months following a change of control in which the NEO is terminated without cause or resigns for good reason, in each case assuming the change of control and termination or resignation occurred on October 27, 2017,25, 2019, the last business day of fiscal 2017.2019.
| Named Executive Officer | Value of Vesting Acceleration ($)(1) | |||
Gary E. Dickerson | ||||
Daniel J. Durn | ||||
| ||||
Ali Salehpour | ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| (1) | Amount based on the |
In accordance with SEC rules, we are providing the ratio of the annual total compensation of our CEO, to the median of the annual total compensation of our employees (other than the CEO). The fiscal 2019 annual total compensation of our CEO, Mr. Dickerson, was $14,072,395, the fiscal 2019 annual total compensation of our median compensated employee (other than the CEO) was $104,500, and the ratio of these amounts was 135 to 1.
This pay ratio is a reasonable estimate calculated in a manner consistent with SEC rules based on our human resources system of record and the methodology described below. Because the SEC rules for identifying the median compensated employee and calculating the pay ratio based on that employee’s annual total compensation allow companies to adopt a variety of methodologies, to apply certain exclusions, and to make reasonable estimates and assumptions that reflect their compensation practices, the pay ratio reported by other companies may not be comparable to the pay ratio reported above, as other companies may have different employment and compensation practices and may utilize different methodologies, exclusions, estimates, and assumptions in calculating their own pay ratios.
As permitted under the SEC rules, we are using the same median employee identified for purposes of our 2018 CEO pay ratio, as we believe the changes to our employee population and compensation have not significantly impacted our ratio. For purposes of identifying our median compensated employee last year, we used our global employee population as of October 28, 2018, the last day of fiscal 2018, identified based on our human resources system of record. We used total direct compensation as our consistently applied compensation measure for such population. In this context, total direct compensation means the sum of the applicable base salary determined as of October 28, 2018, the annual incentive earned for service in fiscal 2018, and the approved value of the annual equity awards granted during fiscal 2018, not includingoff-cycle grants in the case of new hires, promotions or similar circumstances. Given its global population, the Company used the average foreign currency exchange rates during the fiscal year for salary and the rates in effect at the end of fiscal 2018 for the annual incentive. After identifying our median compensated employee, we then calculated the annual total compensation for our median compensated employee using the same methodology used for our CEO as set forth in the Summary Compensation Table of this Proxy Statement.
46 2020 Proxy Statement
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
Applied’s Audit Committee is responsible for review, approval, or ratification of “related person transactions” involving Applied or its subsidiaries and related persons. Under SEC rules, a related person is a director, officer, nominee for director, or 5% shareholder of a company since the beginning of the previous fiscal year, and theirhis or her immediate family members. Applied has adopted written policies and procedures that apply to any transaction or series of transactions in which (1) Applied or a subsidiary is a participant, (2) the amount involved exceeds $120,000 and (3) a related person has a direct or indirect material interest.
In accordance with these policies and procedures, the Audit Committee determines whether the related person has a material interest in a transaction and may, in its discretion, approve, ratify or take other action with respect to the transaction. The Audit Committee reviews all material facts related to the transaction and takes into account, among other factors it deems appropriate, whether the transaction is on terms no less favorable than terms generally available to an unaffiliated third party under the same or similar circumstances, the extent of the related person’s interest in the transaction, and the purpose and the potential benefits to Applied of the transaction.
In addition, the Audit Committee has delegated authority to the Chair of the Audit Committee to review and approve transactions in accordance with specified criteria, if advance review by the Audit Committee is not feasible. Any
transactions approved by the Chair must be reported to the Audit Committee at its next regularly-scheduled meeting.
The Audit Committee has adopted standingpre-approvals for limited transactions with related persons.Pre-approved transactions are as follows:
| ● | Any transaction with another company with which a related person’s only relationship is as an employee, director, or beneficial owner of less than 10% of that company’s shares, if the aggregate amount involved does not exceed the greater of $1 million or 2% of that company’s total annual revenues; |
| ● | Any charitable contribution, grant, or endowment by Applied or The Applied Foundation to a charitable organization, foundation, or university with which a related person’s only relationship is as an employee (other than an executive officer) or a director, if the amount involved does not exceed the lesser of $1 million or 2% of the charitable organization’s total annual receipts; |
46 2018 Proxy Statement
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
| ● | Compensation to executive officers or directors that has been approved by the Human Resources and Compensation Committee; |
| ● | Transactions in which all shareholders receive proportional benefits or where the rates or charges involved are determined by competitive bids; and |
| ● | Banking-related services involving a bank depository of funds, transfer agent, registrar, trustee under a trust indenture, or similar service. |
Applied Materials, Inc. 47
PROPOSAL 3—RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
We are asking shareholders to ratify the appointment of KPMG LLP (“KPMG”) as Applied’s independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2018,2020, which began on October 30, 201728, 2019 and will end on October 28, 2018.25, 2020. The Committee and the Board believe that the retention of KPMG to serve as our independent registered public accounting firm is in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders. Although ratification is not legally required, Applied is submitting the appointment of KPMG to our shareholders for ratification as a matter of good corporate governance. In the event that this appointment is not ratified, the Audit Committee of the Board will reconsider the appointment. Even if the selection is ratified, the Audit Committee, in its discretion, may change the appointment at any time during the fiscal year if it determines that such a change would be in the best interest of the Company and its shareholders.
The Audit Committee appointsis directly responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention, oversight, evaluation and, when appropriate, replacement of the independent registered public accounting firm annually. Before appointingthat serves as the Company’s independent accountants. KPMG has served as
our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2018,since 2004. In selecting the Auditindependent auditor, the Committee considered the firm’s
annually considers many factors, including its qualifications and performance during fiscal 20172019 and 2016. In addition,2018, its independence and tenure as the Audit Committee reviewedCompany’s auditor; KPMG’s capability andpre-approved expertise in handling the breadth and complexity of the Company’s global operations, including the expertise and capability of the lead audit partner; historical and recent performance, including the extent and quality of KPMG’s communications with the Committee; Public Company Accounting Oversight Board inspection reports, and the appropriateness of KPMG’s fees for audit and permissiblenon-audit services performed by KPMGservices. Further, in fiscal 2017 and 2016, as well asconjunction with ensuring the fees paid to KPMG for such services. In its reviewrotation ofnon-audit service fees KPMG’s lead engagement partner, the Committee and its appointmentChair are directly involved with the selection of KPMG as Applied’s independent registered public accounting firm, the Audit Committee considered whether the provision of such services was compatible with maintaining KPMG’s independence.lead engagement partner.
Representatives of KPMG will be present at the Annual Meeting. They will be given an opportunity to make a statement if they wish and will be available to respond to appropriate questions.
The following table shows fees paid by Applied for professional services rendered by KPMG for fiscal 20172019 and 2016,2018, which ended on October 29, 201727, 2019 and October 30, 2016,28, 2018, respectively. All of the fees shown in the table were approved by the Audit Committee in accordance with itspre-approval process.
| Fee Category | Fiscal 2017 | Fiscal 2016 | Fiscal 2019
| Fiscal 2018
| ||||||||||||
| (In thousands) |
(In thousands)
| |||||||||||||||
Audit Fees | $ | 6,354 | $ | 5,507 |
| $6,530
|
|
| $7,776
|
| ||||||
Audit-Related Fees | 322 | 608 |
|
57
|
|
|
342
|
| ||||||||
Tax Fees: | ||||||||||||||||
Tax Compliance and Review | 440 | 549 |
|
585
|
|
|
644
|
| ||||||||
Tax Planning and Advice | 3 | — |
|
187
|
|
|
236
|
| ||||||||
All Other Fees | — | 55 |
|
—
|
|
|
50
|
| ||||||||
Total Fees | $ | 7,119 | $ | 6,719 |
|
$7,359
|
|
|
$9,048
|
| ||||||
Audit Fees consisted of fees for (a) professional services rendered for the annual audit of Applied’s consolidated financial statements, (b) review of the interim consolidated financial statements included in quarterly reports and (c) services that are typically provided by an independent registered public accounting firm in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements. Audit fees for fiscal 2017 include fees for services provided in connection with a $2.2 billion public offering of senior unsecured notes.
Audit-Related Fees included fees for assurance and related services that were reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of Applied’s consolidated financial statements and are not reported under “Audit Fees.” Audit-related fees also included fees incurred for services in connection with compliance with government-funded grant requirements, audits of financial statements of certain employee benefit plans and accounting consultations related to proposed new accounting standards.
Tax Fees consisted of fees for professional services for tax compliance and review, and tax planning and advice. Tax compliance and review services consisted of federal, state and international tax compliance, assistance with tax audits and appeals, and assistance with customs and duties audits. Tax planning and advice services consisted of consultations related to tax compliance matters and certain international operations.
All Other Fees for fiscal 20162018 consisted of fees for services in connection with a contract compliance audit.
The Audit Committee has concluded that the provision of thenon-audit services described above was compatible with maintaining the independence of KPMG.
| ✓ | THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTEFOR THE RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF KPMG AS APPLIED’S INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR FISCAL
| |
48 20182020 Proxy Statement
PROPOSAL 3—RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Policy on Audit Committee’sPre-Approval of Audit and PermissibleNon-Audit Services of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Audit Committee reviews and, as appropriate,pre-approves all audit and permissiblenon-audit services provided by the independent registered public accounting firm. These services may include audit services, audit-related services and tax services, as well as specifically designatednon-audit services which, in the opinion of the Audit Committee, will not impair the independence of the independent registered public accounting firm.Pre-approval generally is provided for up to one year, and anypre-approval is detailed as to the particular service or category of services
and generally is subject to a specific budget. The independent registered public accounting firm and Applied’s management are required to periodically report to the Audit Committee regarding the extent of services provided by the independent registered public accounting firm in accordance with thispre-approval, including the fees for the services performed to date. In addition, the Audit Committee also maypre-approve particular services on acase-by-case basis, as necessary or appropriate.
The information contained in this report shall not be deemed to be “soliciting material” or “filed” with the SEC, or subject to the liabilities of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, except to the extent that Applied specifically incorporates it by reference into a document filed under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act.
Composition. The Audit Committee of the Board is composed of the directors named below. Each member of the Audit Committee meets the independence and financial experience requirements under applicable SEC rules and Nasdaq listing standards. In addition, the Board has determined that each of Judy Bruner, Adrianna C. Ma, Yvonne McGill, Scott A. McGregor and Dennis D. Powell is an “audit committee financial expert” as defined by SEC rules.
Responsibilities. The Audit Committee operates under a written charter that has been adopted by the Board. The charter is reviewed annually for changes, as appropriate. The Audit Committee is responsible for general oversight of Applied’s auditing, accounting and financial reporting processes, system of internal control over financial reporting, and tax, legal, regulatory and ethical compliance. Applied’s management is responsible for: (a) maintaining Applied’s books of account and preparing periodic financial statements based thereon; and (b) maintaining the system of internal control over financial reporting. The independent registered public accounting firm is responsible for auditing Applied’s annual consolidated financial statements.
Review with Management and Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. The Audit Committee hereby reports as follows:
| 1. | The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed with management and the independent registered public accounting firm, KPMG LLP, together and separately, Applied’s audited consolidated financial statements contained in Applied’s Annual Report on Form10-K for fiscal year |
| 2. | The Audit Committee has discussed with KPMG matters required to be discussed by applicable standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board. |
| 3. | The Audit Committee has received from KPMG the written disclosures and the letter required by applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding KPMG’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence, and has discussed with KPMG its independence. |
Based on the review and discussions referred to in paragraphs1-3 above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board, and the Board has approved, that the audited consolidated financial statements be included in Applied’s Annual Report on Form10-K for fiscal year 20172019 for filing with the SEC.
The Audit Committee appointed KPMG as Applied’s independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 20182020 and recommends to shareholders that they ratify the appointment of KPMG as Applied’s independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2018.2020.
This report is submitted by the Audit Committee.
Dennis D. Powell (Chair)
Judy Bruner
Stephen R. Forrest
Adrianna C. Ma
Yvonne McGill
Scott A. McGregor
Applied Materials, Inc. 49
PROPOSAL 4—SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALAPPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT AND RESTATEMENT OF OUR CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION TO PROVIDE FOR RIGHTALLOW SHAREHOLDERS TO ACT BY WRITTEN CONSENT
Kenneth Steiner, whose addressWe are asking shareholders to approve an amendment and stockholding will be providedrestatement of our Amended Certificate of Incorporation (the “Certificate”) to allow shareholder action by us upon request, has submitted the following proposal. Thewritten consent (the “Proposed Amendment”).
Currently, Article SEVENTH of our Certificate prohibits shareholder action by written consent. We received a shareholder proposal will be voted onfor last year’s annual meeting requesting that the Board take the necessary steps to allow shareholders to act by written consent (the “2019 Proposal”). The 2019 Proposal did not pass because it failed to gain the support of a majority of the shares present at the 2018 Annual Meeting only if properly presented by or on behalfmeeting and entitled to vote: it won the support of 49.8% of the proponent.shares present at the meeting and entitled to vote, representing approximately 35.3% of our outstanding shares.
Applied is not responsibleLast year, based on shareholder input and concerns about potential for abuse and shareholder disenfranchisement associated with action by written consent, the accuracy or contentBoard opposed the 2019 Proposal. However, after careful consideration of the proposalvoting results of the 2019 Proposal and supporting statement,recent shareholder feedback, as well as a comprehensive review of market practice and procedural safeguards adopted by other companies with respect to a shareholder right to act by written consent, the Board has declared advisable, and is submitting to shareholders for their approval, the Proposed Amendment, which would allow shareholder action by written consent. Our Board has taken a thoughtful approach to action by written consent and believes it is in the best interests of the Company and shareholders to adopt action by written consent with procedural safeguards. The Proposed Amendment addresses shareholder and Board concerns regarding written consent through specific procedural safeguards, described below, that are presented below as received from the proponent.designed to ensure accountability and a democratic process for all shareholders.
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS A VOTE AGAINST THIS SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL.
Shareholder ProposalEngagement
|
|
Board of Directors Statement in Opposition
The Board of Directors recommends that you vote AGAINST Proposal 4 for the following reasons:
The Board is committed to strong corporate governance and responsiveness to Applied’s shareholders, and believes in maintaining policies and practices that serve the best interests of all shareholders. Following careful reviewShareholder input has been and continues to be an important consideration in our Board’s dialogue around our corporate governance policies and practices. We have a strong history of taking proactive steps in response to our shareholders’ feedback to endeavor to establishbest-in-class governance and compensation structures.
Given the high level of support for the 2019 Proposal and at the direction of our Governance Committee, we engaged in extensive shareholder outreach to hear directly from our shareholders on their views on shareholder action by written consent, as well as our existing special meeting process. We contacted the holders of approximately 57% of our outstanding shares. Of those we contacted, 20 shareholders spoke with us, representing approximately 46% of our outstanding shares and consisting of a roughly equal number of shareholders who voted for and against the 2019 Proposal. Our independent Chairman of the Board and our independent Chair of the Governance Committee participated in several of these calls. Our Board has determinedused this feedback to inform boardroom discussions in determining what action to take in response to the high support level for and shareholder input regarding action by written consent.
Many of the shareholders with whom we engaged expressed the view that support for this shareholder proposal is unwarranted, and further believes that thisthe right to act by written consent proposal would unfairly enablewas unnecessary in light of our existing corporate governance policies and shareholder rights, including the right to call special meetings. Nevertheless, they encouraged us to be responsive to the voting results of the 2019 Proposal.
A majority of these shareholders (16 of the 20 shareholders we spoke with, representing holders of approximately 40% of our outstanding shares) were supportive of the Board’s adoption of a shareholder right to circumventact by written consent. Most also expressed concerns that the protections,written consent process could be subject to abuse absent adequate procedural safeguards, and advantages provided to allexpected that we would adopt such safeguards or were otherwise supportive of us doing so. Among those 16 shareholders, through our existingthree, while supporting the Company’s adoption of action by written consent, expressed a preference for reducing the ownership threshold for the shareholder meeting process in a way that may be detrimental to our shareholders.
Applied is committed to strong corporate governance practices and has meaningful shareholder rights in place. Applied’s shareholders have the abilityright to call special meetings propose actionsin lieu of adopting shareholder action by written consent. However, there was no consensus among our shareholders regarding the appropriate ownership threshold and some shareholders noted concern about setting the threshold too low. The other four shareholders we spoke with, representing holders of approximately 6% of our outstanding shares, did not express a preference for consideration at annual meetings, and can nominate directors through proxy access. The Board believeseither approach.
Regarding the procedural safeguards, the universal view among the 16 shareholders that these rights provide meaningful accountability and establish a democratic process for all shareholders, unlike asupported the Board’s adoption of action by written consent right which can be used in a waywas that disenfranchises shareholders.we should adopt provisions that are consistent with market practice to
50 20182020 Proxy Statement
PROPOSAL 4—SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALAPPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT AND RESTATEMENT OF OUR CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION TO PROVIDE FOR RIGHTALLOW SHAREHOLDERS TO ACT BY WRITTEN CONSENT
prevent abuse and that aligning those provisions with our special meeting right (including the requisite ownership threshold) was an appropriate approach.
Shareholder Interests are Better Served under Existing Special Meeting RightBoard’s Decision and Rationale
The Board believes that Applied’s shareholders are best served by holding meetings in which all shareholders are provided with notice of the meeting and an opportunity to consider and discuss the proposed actions and vote their shares. In 2015, Applied implemented a shareholder right to call special meetings following an extensive shareholder outreach effort to hear directly from shareholders. Applied’s Bylaws provide that special meetings of Applied’s shareholders may be called at the request of the holders of 20% of Applied’s outstanding common stock (an ownership threshold supported by an overwhelming majority of the shareholders that responded to the outreach), without limitations on aggregation of ownership or minimum holding periods. This is less thanone-half of the percentage of shareholders that would be necessary to act by written consent under the shareholder proposal. Any group of investors proposing to act by written consent could call a special meeting. Thisexisting special meeting right provides Applied’s shareholders with a meaningful ability to propose actions for shareholder consideration between annual meetings. Shareholders also haveHowever, given the abilitystrong support for the 2019 Proposal and the shareholder feedback we received, the Board recognizes that the right of shareholders to propose actionsact by written consent at an appropriate threshold may provide an effective balance between ensuring the Board’s accountability to shareholders and enabling the Board and management to operate in an effective manner, and may provide a complementary mechanism for consideration and vote atshareholders to raise matters between annual meetings.
All Applied shareholders have the opportunity to participate in annual shareholder meetings and any special shareholder meetings. These shareholder meetings offer important protections and advantages To ensure that are absent from the written consent process:process provides our shareholders with a similarly equitable and transparent manner to raise matters for consideration by shareholders and to address many of our shareholders’ concerns that the written consent process could be subject to abuse absent adequate procedural safeguards, the Proposed Amendment includes the following safeguards:
| ● |
This 20% threshold is the ownership threshold required for shareholders to call a special meeting. The Board believes that the same threshold is appropriate for shareholder action by written consent, so that a limited group of shareholders cannot use written consent to push forward an action that would lack sufficient shareholder support to merit calling a special meeting. The Board believes the 20% threshold strikes a suitable balance between enhancing the ability of shareholders to initiate shareholder action and limiting the risk of subjecting shareholders to numerous written consent solicitations (or special meeting requests) that may only be relevant to particular constituencies.
| ● | To protect against shareholder disenfranchisement, shareholders seeking to act by written consent must solicit written consent from all shareholders entitled to vote on the matter to enable all shareholders to consider and act on a proposal. This protection eliminates the possibility that a small group of shareholders could act without a democratic process for determining the merits of any |
proposed |
| ● |
| ● |
| ● |
| ● | To ensure that the written consent is |
Action by Written Consent Can Disenfranchise Shareholders
In contrast, adoptionmeeting held within 90 days before Applied received the request for a record date, (iv) if an identical or substantially similar item is included in our notice for a shareholder meeting that was called, but not yet held, or that is called to be held within 90 days after Applied received the request for a record date and (v) if the record date request was made in a manner that involved a violation of Regulation 14A under the Exchange Act or other applicable law. The nomination, elections and removal of this proposal would make it possible for the holders of a bare majority of the shares of Applied’s
outstanding common stock to take significant corporate actions without any fiduciary duties to other shareholders, without any prior notice to Applied or other Applied shareholders, and without giving all shareholders an opportunity to consider and vote on shareholder actions that may have important ramifications for both Applied and its shareholders. This approach would effectively disenfranchise all of those shareholders who do not have, or are not given, the opportunity to participate in the written consent, and who may not be informed about the proposed action until after it has already been taken.
If this proposal were implemented, proposed shareholder actions involving important decisions could be approved without the important safeguard of advance notice to all Applied shareholders, and without the benefit of enabling all shareholders to consider arguments for and against, express their views, and vote. This written consent procedure could also result in multiple consents being solicited simultaneously, putting shareholders at risk of confusion and resulting in contradictory actions. The Board believes that the written consent procedure is more appropriate for a closely-held corporation with a small number of shareholders, and not for a widely-held public company such as Applied.
Current Strong Corporate Governance Practices Demonstrate Responsiveness and Accountability
The Board further believes that Applied’s strong corporate governance practices make adoption of this proposal unnecessary. In addition to giving shareholders an expansive right to call special meetings, Applied’s corporate governance practices provide transparency and accountability of the Board to all Applied shareholders, and demonstrate that Applied is responsive to shareholder concerns:
deemed substantially similar items
Applied Materials, Inc. 51
to all actions involving the nomination, election or |
|
In lightThis summary is qualified in its entirety by reference to the complete text of Applied’s strong corporate governance practices, including the existing rightproposed amended and restated Certificate of Incorporation, which is attached asAppendix B to this Proxy Statement.
Adoption of this proposal requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the outstanding shares of our common stock.
If approved by shareholders, Applied will promptly file with the Delaware Secretary of State an amended and restated
Certificate of Incorporation, the form of which is attached asAppendix Bto call special meetings,this Proxy Statement, incorporating the Proposed Amendment. The amended and restated Certificate of Incorporation will become effective on the date the filing is accepted by the Delaware Secretary of State. If the Proposed Amendment is not approved by the requisite vote, the Proposed Amendment will not be implemented and the ability ofcurrent prohibition on shareholder action by written consent will remain.
If the Proposed Amendment is approved by shareholders, to nominate directors through proxy access, the Board believes that adoptionhas approved conforming changes to Applied’s bylaws, which would become effective upon the filing of the shareholder proposal is unnecessaryamended and is not inrestated Certificate of Incorporation with the best interestsDelaware Secretary of Applied and its shareholders.State.
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE | ||
52 20182020 Proxy Statement
PROPOSAL 5—SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL FORQUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE PROXY STATEMENT AND OUR 2020 ANNUAL DISCLOSURE OFEEO-1 DATAMEETING
PROPOSAL 5—SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL FOR ANNUAL DISCLOSURE OFEEO-1 DATA
The New York City Employees’ Retirement System, the New York City Fire Department Pension Fund, the New York City Teachers’ Retirement System, the New York City Police Pension Fund and the New York City Board of Education Retirement System, whose addresses and stockholdings will be provided by us upon request, have submitted the following proposal. The shareholder proposal will be voted on at the 2018 Annual Meeting only if properly presented by or on behalf of the proponents.
Applied is not responsible for the accuracy or content of the proposal and supporting statement, which are presented below as received from the proponents.
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS A VOTE AGAINST THIS SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL.
Annual Disclosure ofEEO-1 Data
RESOLVED: Shareholders request that the Board of Directors adopt and enforce a policy requiring Applied Materials, Inc. (the “Company”) to disclose annually itsEEO-1 data – a comprehensive breakdown of its workforce by race and gender according to 10 employment categories —on its website or in its corporate responsibility report, beginning in 2018.
Supporting Statement
Diversity matters. Numerous studies suggest that companies with comprehensive diversity policies and programs, and strong leadership commitment to implement and fully integrate diversity into their culture and practices, enhance long-term shareholder value. A McKinsey & Company global study (Diversity Matters, February 2015), for example, found that “companies in the top quartile for racial and ethnic diversity are 35 percent more likely to have financial returns above their respective national industry median.”
Workplace diversity provides competitive advantage by generating diverse, valuable perspectives, creativity, innovation and adaptation, increased productivity and morale, while eliminating the limitations of “groupthink.” It also reduces potential legal and reputational risks associated with workplace discrimination and builds corporate reputations as fair employers.
The high tech industry of which the company is a part, is characterized by persistent and pervasive underrepresentation of minorities and women, particularly in senior positions.
Based on 2014EEO-1 filings, the EEOC Commission estimates that the high tech industry is over 64% male and
over 68% white. Blacks, Hispanics and women are under- represented in high tech compared to their representation in all private industries. Black and Hispanic representation at the executive, managerial and professional levels is between one and five percent, and women representation at these levels is between 20% and 30%. All three groups’ representation at these levels in high tech is lower than for all private industries (https://www.eeoc.gov/eeoc/statistics/
reports/hightech/upload/diversity-in-high-tech-report.pdf).
Applied Materials provides no information on the gender and racial makeup of its total workforce. This does not allow investors to fully evaluate the company’s diversity initiatives and their impact, especially across job categories and particularly in more senior roles. Without more detailed quantitative information on a comparable basis, shareholders have no way to evaluate and benchmark the effectiveness of these efforts over time and relative to peers.
Federal law requires companies with 100 or more employees to annually submit anEEO-1 Report to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. The report profiles a company’s workforce by race and gender in 10 job categories, including senior management.
Overtwo-thirds of S&P 100 companies now discloseEEO-1 data, including companies in the technology industry such as Apple, Alphabet, Salesforce and Ingram Micro.
The proposal does not limit the company from providing more detailed quantitative and qualitative disclosures where appropriate. We also encourage the company to describe the steps it is taking and the challenges it faces in moving forward to achieve its diversity plans and goals.
Applied Materials, Inc. 53
Board of Directors Statement in Opposition
The Board of Directors recommends that you vote AGAINST Proposal 5 for the following reasons:
The Board of Directors has given careful consideration to the shareholder proposal and believes that the disclosure of ourEEO-1 data would not constructively advance our ongoing commitment to diversity and inclusion. Accordingly, the Board recommends a vote AGAINST this proposal.
Applied has a Long-Standing Commitment to Diversity
We believe that different opinions, experiences and backgrounds enhance the teamwork process and result in better ideas and innovations. Diversity and inclusion are foundational to our successful global talent strategy to attract, develop and retain world-class employees. Our diversity footprint across 17 countries spans various cultures, backgrounds, ages, ethnicities and gender that help weave a rich fabric of talent. Applied’s commitment to diversity takes many forms, including the following key initiatives:
|
54 2018 Proxy Statement
PROPOSAL 5—SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL FOR ANNUAL DISCLOSURE OFEEO-1 DATA
Disclosure ofEEO-1 Data Would Not Further Workplace Diversity
FormEEO-1 requires us to categorize our U.S. workforce by gender and race according to certain EEOC-mandated job categories that do not account for any company-or industry-specific factors. It is designed to yield generalized data across all categories of private employers, rather than information specific to any one company. As such,EEO-1 data is not reflective of Applied’s diversity and could be misconstrued in ways that could encumber our efforts for greater diversity and inclusion. In addition,EEO-1 data relies on voluntary self-reporting by our U.S. employees only and does not cover our global workforce, which comprises more
than 18,400 employees in 90 locations in 17 countries. This leads to very low comparability of data, which significantly limits the value of disclosure.
Disclosure ofEEO-1 Data Could Create a Competitive Disadvantage
Because theEEO-1 reports contain data regarding Applied’s workforce composition, the reports could provide key information to our competitors, including the emphasis placed by Applied in each employment category and insights into Applied’s management of its labor costs. Comparison ofEEO-1 filings over time would give competitors a view of trends in Applied’s business. With this historical trend data, a competitor would be able to predict how Applied will react in certain market conditions common to our industry. Moreover, our direct U.S. competitors, with whom we compete for a small pool of talent, do not disclose theirEEO-1 data.
For each of the reasons discussed above, we believe that disclosure ofEEO-1 data would provide an incomplete picture of our commitment to diversity and could hinder our diversity efforts, particularly if the information is misconstrued by potential recruits and current employees, as well as cause competitive harm.
We are strongly committed to diversity as a top priority to fuel innovation, creativity and engagement in our workforce. We understand that continued progress will require ongoing work, sustained commitment, and greater transparency around both our efforts and their impact. However, for the reasons discussed above, we do not believe that disclosing ourEEO-1 data will meaningfully further our goal of workplace diversity.
Applied Materials, Inc. 55
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE PROXY
STATEMENT AND OUR 20182020 ANNUAL MEETING
| Q: | Why am I receiving these materials? |
| A: | The Board of Directors of Applied Materials is providing these materials to you in connection with its solicitation of proxies for use at Applied’s |
These proxy materials are being provided on or about January 25, 2018, 2020 to all shareholders of record of Applied as of January 10, 2018.16, 2020.
| Q: | What information is contained in these materials? |
| A: | This Proxy Statement contains important information regarding the |
If you requested to receive printed proxy materials, these materials also include an accompanying proxy card. If you received more than one proxy card, this generally means your shares are registered differently or are in more than one account. Please provide voting instructions for each proxy card or, if you vote via the Internet or by telephone, vote once for each proxy card you receive to ensure that all of your shares are voted.
| Q: | What proposals will be voted on at the Annual Meeting? What are the Board’s recommendations? |
| A: | The following table describes the proposals to be voted on at the Annual Meeting and the Board’s voting recommendations: |
| Proposal | Board Recommendation | |||
1. Election of ten directors
|
✓
|
FOR each Nominee
| ||
2. Approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of our named executive officers for fiscal year
|
✓
|
FOR
| ||
3. Ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year
|
✓
|
FOR
| ||
4.
|
|
| ||
|
|
| ||
At the time this Proxy Statement was mailed, we were not aware of any other matters to be presented at the Annual Meeting other than those set forth in this Proxy Statement and in the notice accompanying this Proxy Statement.
| Q: | What is the record date? How many shares are entitled to vote? |
| A: | Shareholders who owned Applied common stock at the close of business on January |
A complete list of these shareholders will be available at our corporate offices at 3050 Bowers Avenue, Building 1, Santa Clara, California 95054 during regular business hours for the 10 days prior to the Annual Meeting. This list also will be available during the Annual Meeting at the meeting location. A shareholder may examine the list for any legally valid purpose related to the Annual Meeting. |
A complete list of these shareholders will be available at our corporate offices at 3050 Bowers Avenue, Building 1, Santa Clara, California 95054 during regular business hours for the ten days prior to the Annual Meeting. This list also will be available during the Annual Meeting at the meeting location. A shareholder may examine the list for any legally valid purpose related to the Annual Meeting.
56 2018 Proxy Statement
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE PROXY STATEMENT AND OUR 2018 ANNUAL MEETING
| Q: | What is the difference between holding shares as a shareholder of record and as a beneficial owner? |
| A: | Most Applied shareholders hold their shares as beneficial owners (through a broker, bank, or other nominee) rather than as a shareholder of record (directly in their own name). |
Shareholders of Record. If your shares are registered directly in your name with Applied’s transfer agent, Computershare, you are considered the shareholder of record with respect to those shares, and these proxy materials are being sent directly to you. As a shareholder of record, you have the right to grant your voting proxy directly to Applied or to vote in person at the Annual Meeting. If you requested printed proxy materials, we have enclosed an accompanying proxy card for you to |
Applied Materials, Inc. If your shares are registered directly in your name with Applied’s transfer agent, Computershare, you are considered the shareholder of record with respect to those shares, and these proxy materials are being sent directly to you. As a shareholder of record, you have the right to grant your voting proxy directly to Applied or to vote in person at the Annual Meeting. If you requested printed proxy materials, we have enclosed an accompanying proxy card for you to use. You may also submit voting instructions via the Internet or by telephone by following the instructions on the accompanying proxy card, as described below under “How can I vote my shares?”53
| use. You may also submit voting instructions via the Internet or by telephone by following the instructions on the accompanying proxy card, as described below under “How can I vote my shares?” |
Beneficial Owners.If your shares are held in a brokerage account or by a broker, bank, or other nominee, you are considered the beneficial owner of shares held in street name, and these proxy materials are being forwarded to you by your broker, bank, or other nominee, which is considered the shareholder of record with respect to those shares. As a beneficial owner, you have the right to direct your broker, bank, or other nominee on how to vote the shares in your account. However, because you are not the shareholder of record, you may not vote these shares in person at the Annual Meeting, unless you request and provide at the Annual Meeting a valid proxy from your broker, bank, or other nominee. Your broker, bank, or other nominee has included a voting instruction form for you to use to direct them how to vote your shares. Please instruct your broker, bank, or other nominee how to vote your shares using the voting instruction form you received from them.
| Q: | Can I attend the Annual Meeting? |
| A: | Applied shareholders on the record date or their legal proxy holders may attend the Annual Meeting. To be admitted to the Annual Meeting, you will need a form of photo identification and valid proof of ownership of Applied common stock or a valid legal proxy. If you have a legal proxy from a shareholder of record, you must bring a form of photo identification and the legal proxy to the Annual Meeting. If you have a legal proxy from a street name shareholder, you must bring a form of photo identification, a legal proxy from the record holder (i.e., the bank, broker or other holder of record) to the street name shareholder that is assignable, and the legal proxy from the street name shareholder to you. Each shareholder may appoint only one proxy holder to attend on such shareholder’s behalf. |
The use of cameras, recording equipment and other electronic devices (including cell phones, tablets, laptops, etc.) is not permitted at the Annual Meeting.
| Q: | How can I vote my shares? |
| A: | You may vote over the Internet, by telephone, by mail, or in person at the Annual Meeting. Votes submitted by telephone or over the Internet must be received by 11:59 p.m., Eastern Time, on Wednesday, March |
Voting over the Internet. To vote over the Internet, please follow either the instructions included on your proxy card or the voting instructions you receive bye-mail or that |
| are being provided via the Internet. If you vote over the Internet, you do not need to complete and mail a proxy card. |
Voting by Telephone. If you have requested printed proxy materials, such materials will include instructions for how to vote by telephone. Please follow either the instructions included on your proxy card or voting instruction form. If you vote by telephone, you do not need to complete and mail a proxy card.
Voting by Mail. If you have requested printed proxy materials, you may vote by mail by signing the proxy card and returning it in the prepaid and addressed envelope enclosed with the proxy materials. By signing and returning the proxy card, you are authorizing the individuals named on the proxy card to vote your shares at the Annual Meeting in the manner you indicate. We encourage you to sign and return the proxy card even if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting so that your shares will be voted if you are unable to attend the Annual Meeting. If you receive more than one proxy card, it is an indication that your shares are held in multiple accounts. Please sign and return all proxy cards to ensure that all of your shares are voted. Your printed proxy materials may also indicate methods whereby you may vote by telephone or over the Internet instead of signing, dating a returning the proxy card by mail.
Voting in Person at the Meeting. If you attend the Annual Meeting and plan to vote in person, we will provide you with a ballot at the Annual Meeting. If you are a shareholder of record, you have the right to vote in person at the Annual Meeting. If you are the beneficial owner of shares held in street name and you wish to vote in person at the Annual Meeting, you will need to bring to the Annual Meeting a legal proxy from your broker or other nominee authorizing you to vote those shares.
Applied Employee Plan Participants. If you were a participant in Applied’s Employee Savings and Retirement Plan 401(k) Plan, your proxy represents all shares you owned as of the record date through the 401(k) Plan, assuming that your shares are registered in the same name. Your proxy will serve as voting instructions for the trustee of the 401(k) Plan. If you owned shares through the 401(k) Plan and you do not
Applied Materials, Inc. 57
vote, the 401(k) Plan trustee will vote those shares in the same proportion as other 401(k) Plan participants vote their 401(k) Plan shares. We encourage you to provide instructions to the trustee regarding the voting of your shares. Instructions provided over the Internet or by telephone must be received by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on March 5, 2018. Please note that Applied Employee Plan Participants may not vote their shares in person at the Annual Meeting.
If you own shares purchased through Applied’s Employees’ Stock Purchase Plan or Applied’s Stock Purchase Plan for Offshore Employees that are still held by the plans’ recordkeeper and you do not vote these shares, the shares may be voted in accordance with standard brokerage industry practices only on routine matters.
| Q: | Can I change my vote or revoke my proxy? |
| A: | If you are a shareholder of record, you may change your vote or revoke your proxy at any time before the Annual Meeting. To change your vote or revoke your proxy, you must: |
| ● | Sign and return a later-dated proxy card, or enter a new vote over the Internet or by telephone; or |
54 2020 Proxy Statement
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE PROXY STATEMENT AND OUR 2020 ANNUAL MEETING
| ● | Provide written notice of the revocation to Applied’s Corporate Secretary at: Applied Materials, Inc., Attention: |
| ● | Attend the Annual Meeting and vote in person. |
Only the latest validly-executed proxy that you submit will be counted.
| Q: | What is the quorum requirement for the Annual Meeting? |
| A: | A majority of the outstanding shares entitled to vote as of the record date must be present at the Annual Meeting to constitute a quorum and in order to conduct business at the Annual Meeting. Your shares are counted as present if you vote in person at the Annual Meeting, over the Internet, by telephone, or by submitting a properly executed proxy card by mail. |
Abstentions and brokernon-votes are counted as present for the purpose of determining a quorum.
| Q: | How are votes counted? |
| A: | You may vote “FOR,” “AGAINST,” or “ABSTAIN” with respect to each of the director nominees. If you elect to abstain from voting on the election of directors, the abstention will not have any effect on the election of directors. In tabulating the voting results for the election of directors, only “FOR” and “AGAINST” votes are counted. |
You may vote “FOR,” “AGAINST,” or “ABSTAIN” with respect to:
| ● | The approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of our named executive officers for fiscal year |
| ● | The ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year |
| ● | The |
If you elect to abstain from voting on any of these fourthree proposals, the abstention will have the same effect as an “AGAINST” vote with respect to such proposals.
If you are a shareholder of record and you sign and return your proxy card without giving specific voting instructions, your shares will be voted on the proposals as recommended by our Board and in accordance with the discretion of the persons named on the proxy card with respect to any other matters that may properly come before the Annual Meeting.
If your shares are held in street name and you do not instruct your broker on a timely basis on how to vote your shares, your brokerage firm, in its discretion, may either leave your shares unvoted or vote your shares on routine matters. Only the ratification of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm is a routine matter. Without your voting instructions, your brokerage firm cannot vote your shares on any other proposal. These unvoted shares, called “brokernon-votes,” refer to shares held by brokers who have not received voting instructions from their clients and who do not have discretionary authority to vote onnon-routine matters. Brokernon-votes are not considered entitled to vote and will not affect the outcome of the vote onnon-routine proposals. Brokernon-votes will not have an effect on the election of any director nominee.nominee or the approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of our named executive officers. Brokernon-votes will have the same effect as a vote against the proposal to amend and restate our Certificate of Incorporation.
58Applied Materials, Inc. 2018 Proxy Statement55
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE PROXY STATEMENT AND OUR 2018 ANNUAL MEETING
Q: What is the vote requirement to approve each proposal?
| A: | The following table describes the proposals to be considered at the Annual Meeting, the vote required to elect directors and to adopt each of the other proposals, and the manner in which votes will be counted: |
| Proposal | Vote Required | Effect of Abstentions | Effect of BrokerNon-Votes | |||
1. Election of ten directors
|
Majority of votes cast
|
No effect
|
No effect
| |||
2. Approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of our named executive officers for fiscal year
|
Majority of shares present and entitled to vote thereon
|
Same as vote against
|
No effect
| |||
3. Ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year
|
Majority of shares present and entitled to vote thereon
|
Same as vote against
|
Brokers have discretion to vote
| |||
4.
|
Majority of all outstanding shares
|
Same as vote against
|
| |||
|
| Same as vote against |
|
| Q: | Who will count the votes? Where can I find the voting results of the Annual Meeting? |
| A: | Votes will be tabulated by an independent inspector of elections appointed for the Annual Meeting. Preliminary voting results will be announced at the Annual Meeting. Final voting results will be reported in a Current Report on Form8-K, which will be filed with the SEC following the Annual Meeting. |
| Q: | Who will bear the cost of soliciting votes for the Annual Meeting? |
| A: | Applied will bear the entire cost of proxy solicitation, including the preparation, assembly, printing, mailing and distribution of the proxy materials. We have hired Innisfree M&A Incorporated to assist in the distribution and solicitation of proxies. Solicitations may be made personally or by mail, facsimile, telephone, messenger, or via the Internet. In addition to the estimated proxy solicitation cost of $20,000, plus reasonableout-of-pocket expenses for this service, we will reimburse brokerage firms and other custodians for their reasonableout-of-pocket expenses for forwarding the proxy materials to shareholders. |
| Q: | Why did I receive a |
| A: | In accordance with SEC rules, we are furnishing proxy materials to our shareholders primarily via the Internet, instead of mailing printed copies of those materials to each shareholder. On January |
This process is designed to expedite shareholders’ receipt of proxy materials, lower the cost of the Annual Meeting and help conserve natural resources. However, if you would prefer to receive printed proxy materials, please follow the instructions included in the Notice of Internet Availability. If you have previously elected to receive our proxy materials electronically, you will continue to receive these materials viae-mail unless you elect otherwise.
Applied Materials, Inc. 5659 2020 Proxy Statement
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE PROXY STATEMENT AND OUR 2020 ANNUAL MEETING
| Q: | I share an address with another shareholder and we received only one paper copy of the proxy materials. How can I obtain an additional copy of the proxy materials? |
| A: | Under a practice approved by the SEC called “householding,” shareholders who have the same address and last name and who do not participate in electronic delivery of proxy materials will receive only one mailed copy of our proxy materials, unless one or more of these shareholders notifies us that he or she |
| wishes to receive individual copies. Shareholders who |
| participate in householding will continue to receive separate proxy cards. |
If you share an address with another shareholder and received only one set of proxy materials and would like to request a separate paper copy of these materials, please: (1) go to www.proxyvote.com and follow the instructions provided; (2) send ane-mail message to investor_relations@amat.com with “Request for Proxy Materials” in the subject line and provide your name, address and the control number indicated on your proxy card or Notice of Internet Availability; or (3) call our Investor Relations department at(408) 748-5227.
60Applied Materials, Inc. 2018 Proxy Statement57
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires Applied’s directors and executive officers, and holders of more than 10% of Applied common stock to file with the SEC reports about their ownership of common stock and other equity securities of Applied. Such directors, officers and 10% shareholders are required by SEC rules to furnish Applied with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file.
SEC rules require us to identify in this Proxy Statement anyone who filed a required report late during the most recent fiscal year. Based on our review of forms we received and written representations from certain of the reporting persons, we believe that during fiscal 2017, all Section 16(a) filing requirements were satisfied on a timely basis.
Shareholder Proposals or Nominations for 20192021 Annual Meeting
If a shareholder would like us to consider including a proposal in the proxy statement for our 2019 annual meeting2021 Annual Meeting pursuant toRule 14a-8 of the Exchange Act, the proposal must be received by our Corporate Secretary at our principal executive offices on or before September 27, 2018., 2020.
AFor a shareholder’s notice of nomination of one or more director candidates to be included in our proxy statement and ballot pursuant to the proxy access right included in Section 2.15 of our Bylaws, it must be received by our Corporate Secretary at our principal executive offices no earlier than August 28, 2018,, 2020, and no later than the close of business on September 27, 2018., 2020. The notice must contain the information required by our Bylaws, and the shareholder(s) and nominee(s) must comply with the information and other requirements in our Bylaws relating to the inclusion of shareholder nominees in our proxy materials.
If a shareholder seeks to propose other business or nominate a director, but does not seek to include a proposal or director nominee in our proxy statement for our 2019 annual meeting,2021 Annual Meeting, notice must be received by our Corporate Secretary at our principal executive offices no earlier than November 23, 2018,27, 2020, and no later than the close of business on December 23, 2018.27, 2020.
Our Bylaws contain specific requirements regarding a shareholder’s ability to nominate a director or to submit a proposal for consideration at an upcoming meeting. If you would like a copy of our Bylaws, please contact our Corporate Secretary by mail addressed to Thomas F. Larkins,Christina Y. Lai, Corporate Secretary, Applied Materials, Inc., 3225 Oakmead Village Drive, M/S 1241,1268, P.O. Box 58039, Santa Clara, CA 95052, or bye-mail at corporatesecretary@amat.com.
In Applied’s filings with the SEC, information is sometimes “incorporated by reference.” This means that we are referring you to information that has previously been filed with the SEC and the information should be considered as part of the particular filing. As provided under SEC rules, the “Audit Committee Report” and the “Human Resources and Compensation Committee Report” contained in this Proxy Statement are not incorporated by reference into any of our other filings with the SEC, except to the extent we specifically incorporate either report by reference into a filing. In addition, this Proxy Statement includes several website addresses. These website addresses are intended to provide inactive, textual references only. The information on these websites is not part of this Proxy Statement.
YOU MAY OBTAIN A COPY OF APPLIED’S ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM10-K FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED OCTOBER 29, 201727, 2019 ON OUR WEBSITE ATwww.appliedmaterials.com OR WITHOUT CHARGE BY SENDING A WRITTEN REQUEST TO APPLIED MATERIALS, INC., 3050 BOWERS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 58039, M/S 1261, SANTA CLARA, CALIFORNIA 95052-8039, ATTN: INVESTOR RELATIONS.
By Order of the Board of Directors
Santa Clara, California
January 25, 2018, 2020
Applied Materials, Inc. 5861 2020 Proxy Statement
UNAUDITED RECONCILIATION OFNON-GAAP ADJUSTED FINANCIAL MEASURES
| Fiscal Year | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | ||||||||||||||||
| (In millions, except per share amounts) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Non-GAAP Adjusted Earnings Per Diluted Share | ||||||||||||||||||||
Reported earnings per diluted share—GAAP basis1 | $ | 3.17 | $ | 1.54 | $ | 1.12 | $ | 0.87 | $ | 0.21 | ||||||||||
Certain items associated with acquisitions2 | 0.16 | 0.16 | 0.14 | 0.13 | 0.14 | |||||||||||||||
Acquisition integration costs | — | — | — | 0.02 | 0.02 | |||||||||||||||
Certain items associated with terminated business combination3 | — | — | 0.03 | 0.05 | 0.01 | |||||||||||||||
Gain on derivatives associated with terminated business combination, net | — | — | (0.05 | ) | (0.02 | ) | — | |||||||||||||
Inventory charges (reversals) related to restructuring and asset impairments4,5 | — | — | 0.03 | — | 0.03 | |||||||||||||||
Impairment of goodwill and intangible assets | — | — | — | — | 0.21 | |||||||||||||||
Other gains, losses or charges, net | (0.01 | ) | 0.01 | 0.01 | — | — | ||||||||||||||
Resolution of prior years’ income tax filings, reinstatement of federal R&D tax credit and other tax items1 | (0.07 | ) | 0.04 | (0.09 | ) | 0.02 | (0.03 | ) | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Non-GAAP adjusted earnings per diluted share | $ | 3.25 | $ | 1.75 | $ | 1.19 | $ | 1.07 | $ | 0.59 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Weighted average number of diluted shares | 1,084 | 1,116 | 1,226 | 1,231 | 1,219 | |||||||||||||||
Fiscal Year | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | ||||||||||||||||
| (In millions, except per share amounts) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Non-GAAP Adjusted Earnings Per Diluted Share | ||||||||||||||||||||
Reported earnings per diluted share—GAAP basis1,2 | $ | 2.86 | $ | 2.96 | $ | 3.25 | $ | 1.54 | $ | 1.12 | ||||||||||
Certain items associated with acquisitions3 | 0.05 | 0.18 | 0.16 | 0.16 | 0.14 | |||||||||||||||
Acquisition integration and deal costs | 0.02 | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
Impairment (gain on sale) of strategic investments, net | — | (0.02 | ) | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||
Loss (gain) on strategic investments, net | (0.03 | ) | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||
Certain items associated with terminated business combination4 | — | — | — | — | 0.03 | |||||||||||||||
Gain on derivatives associated with terminated business combination, net | — | — | — | — | (0.05 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Inventory charges (reversals) related to restructuring and asset impairments5 | — | — | — | — | 0.03 | |||||||||||||||
Other gains, losses or charges, net | — | — | (0.01 | ) | 0.01 | 0.01 | ||||||||||||||
Income tax effect of changes in applicable U.S. tax laws6 | (0.03 | ) | 1.08 | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||
Income tax effects related to amortization of intra-entity intangible asset transfers | 0.07 | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
| Resolution of prior years’ income tax filings, reinstatement of federal R&D tax credit and other tax items2 | 0.10 | (0.02 | ) | (0.07 | ) | 0.04 | (0.09 | ) | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Non-GAAP adjusted earnings per diluted share | $ | 3.04 | $ | 4.18 | $ | 3.33 | $ | 1.75 | $ | 1.19 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Weighted average number of diluted shares | 945 | 1,026 | 1,084 | 1,116 | 1,226 | |||||||||||||||
| 1 | Amounts for fiscal 2017 included the recognition of the previously unrecognized foreign tax credits. |
| 2 | Amounts for fiscal 2015 included an adjustment to decrease the provision for income taxes by $28 million with a corresponding increase in net income, resulting in an increase in diluted earnings per share of $0.02. The adjustment was excluded in Applied’snon-GAAP adjusted results and was made primarily to correct an error in the recognition of cost of sales in the U.S. related to intercompany sales, which resulted in overstating profitability in the U.S. and the provision for income taxes in immaterial amounts in each year since fiscal 2010. |
These items are incremental charges attributable to |
These items are incremental charges related to the terminated business combination agreement with Tokyo Electron Limited, consisting of acquisition-related and integration planning costs. |
Results for fiscal 2015 primarily included $35 million of inventory charges, $17 million of restructuring charges and asset impairments related to cost reductions in the solar business, and a $2 million favorable adjustment of restructuring reserves related to prior restructuring plans. |
Charges to income tax provision related to aone-time transition tax and a decrease in U.S. deferred tax assets as a result of the |
| Fiscal Year | ||||
| 2017 | ||||
| (In millions, except percentages) | ||||
Non-GAAP Adjusted Gross Profit | ||||
Reported gross profit—GAAP basis | $ | 6,532 | ||
Certain items associated with acquisitions1 | 172 | |||
|
| |||
Non-GAAP Adjusted Gross Profit | $ | 6,704 | ||
|
| |||
Non-GAAP Adjusted Gross Margin (% of net sales) | 46.1 | % | ||
| Fiscal Year | ||
| 2019 | ||
| (In millions, except percentages) |
Non-GAAP Adjusted Gross Profit | ||||
Reported gross profit—GAAP basis | $ | 6,386 | ||
Certain items associated with acquisitions1 | 37 | |||
|
| |||
Non-GAAP Adjusted Gross Profit | $ | 6,423 | ||
|
| |||
Non-GAAP Adjusted Gross Margin (% of net sales) | 44.0 | % | ||
| 1 | These items are incremental charges attributable to acquisitions, consisting of amortization of purchased intangible assets. |
Applied Materials, Inc. A-1
Fiscal Year | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | ||||||||||||||||
| (In millions, except percentages) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Non-GAAP Adjusted Operating Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Reported operating income—GAAP basis | $ | 3,350 | $ | 4,491 | $ | 3,936 | $ | 2,152 | $ | 1,693 | ||||||||||
Certain items associated with acquisitions1 | 55 | 197 | 191 | 188 | 185 | |||||||||||||||
Acquisition integration and deal costs | 22 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||||||
Certain items associated with terminated business combination2 | — | — | — | — | 50 | |||||||||||||||
Gain on derivatives associated with terminated business combination, net | — | — | — | — | (89 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Inventory charges (reversals) related to restructuring and asset impairments3,4 | — | — | — | (3 | ) | 49 | ||||||||||||||
Other gains, losses or charges, net | — | — | (12 | ) | 8 | 6 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Non-GAAP adjusted operating income | $ | 3,427 | $ | 4,693 | $ | 4,118 | $ | 2,347 | $ | 1,896 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Non-GAAP adjusted operating margin | 23.5 | % | 28.1 | % | 28.0 | % | 21.7 | % | 19.6 | % | ||||||||||
| 1 | These items are incremental charges attributable to completed acquisitions, consisting of amortization of purchased intangible assets. |
Applied Materials, Inc. A-1
| Fiscal Year | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | ||||||||||||||||
| (In millions, except percentages) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Non-GAAP Adjusted Operating Income | ||||||||||||||||||||
Reported operating income—GAAP basis | $ | 3,868 | $ | 2,152 | $ | 1,693 | $ | 1,520 | $ | 432 | ||||||||||
Certain items associated with acquisitions1 | 191 | 188 | 185 | 183 | 201 | |||||||||||||||
Acquisition integration costs | 3 | 2 | 2 | 34 | 38 | |||||||||||||||
Certain items associated with terminated business combination2 | — | — | 50 | 73 | 17 | |||||||||||||||
Loss (gain) on derivatives associated with terminated business combination, net | — | — | (89 | ) | (30 | ) | 7 | |||||||||||||
Inventory charges (reversals) related to restructuring and asset impairments3,4,5,6 | — | (3 | ) | 49 | 5 | 63 | ||||||||||||||
Impairment of goodwill and intangible assets | — | — | — | — | 278 | |||||||||||||||
Other gains, losses or charges, net | (12 | ) | 8 | 6 | (4 | ) | (4 | ) | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Non-GAAP adjusted operating income | $ | 4,050 | $ | 2,347 | $ | 1,896 | $ | 1,781 | $ | 1,032 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Non-GAAP adjusted operating margin | 27.9 | % | 21.7 | % | 19.6 | % | 19.6 | % | 13.7 | % | ||||||||||
| 2 | These items are incremental charges related to the terminated business combination agreement with Tokyo Electron Limited, consisting of acquisition-related and integration planning costs. |
| 3 | Results for fiscal 2016 included adjustments associated with the cost reductions in the solar business. |
| 4 | Results for fiscal 2015 primarily included $35 million of inventory charges, $17 million of restructuring charges and asset impairments related to cost reductions in the solar business, and a $2 million favorable adjustment of restructuring reserves related to prior restructuring plans. |
Use ofNon-GAAP Adjusted Financial Measures
Management usesnon-GAAP adjusted financial measures to evaluate the Company’s operating and financial performance and for planning purposes, and as performance measures in its executive compensation program. Applied believes these measures enhance an overall understanding of ourits performance and investors’ ability to review the Company’s business from the same perspective as the Company’s management and facilitate comparisons of the currentthis period’s results with prior periods on a consistent basis by excluding items that we domanagement does not believe are indicative of ourApplied’s ongoing operating performance.
Thenon-GAAP adjusted financial measures presented above are adjusted to exclude the impact of certain costs, expenses, gains and losses, including certain items related to mergers and acquisitions; restructuring charges and any associated adjustments; impairments of assets, or investments; gain or loss on sale of strategic investments; certain income tax items and other discrete adjustmentsadjustments. Additionally, fiscal 2019 and 2018non-GAAP results exclude estimated discrete income tax items.expense items associated with recent U.S. tax legislation. Reconciliations of thesenon-GAAP measures to the most directly comparable financial measures calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP are provided in the financial tables presented above. There are limitations in usingnon-GAAP financial measures because thenon-GAAP financial measures are not prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, may be different fromnon-GAAP financial measures used by other companies, and may exclude certain items that may have a material impact upon our reported financial results. The presentation of this additional information is not meant to be considered in isolation or as a substitute for the directly comparable financial measures prepared in accordance with GAAP.
Applied adopted the authoritative guidance related to revenue recognition in the first quarter of fiscal 2019 using the full retrospective method. Applied also adopted authoritative guidance related to retirement benefits in the first quarter of fiscal 2019 using the retrospective method. The adoption of these guidance required restating fiscal years 2018 and 2017 results as presented above.
A-2 20182020 Proxy Statement
PROPOSED AMENDED AND RESTATED CERTIFICATE
OF INCORPORATION
AMENDED AND RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
OF
APPLIED MATERIALS, INC.
(as amended to March 10, 2009)
Applied Materials, Inc., a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware, hereby certifies as follows:
| (1) | The original certificate of incorporation was filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware on March 18, 1987. |
| (2) | This Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation was duly adopted by the board of directors of the corporation and by the stockholders of the Corporation in accordance with Sections 242 and 245 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the “DGCL”). |
| (3) | Pursuant to Sections 242 and 245 of the DGCL, the text of the Certificate of Incorporation of Applied Materials, Inc. is hereby amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows: |
FIRST: The name of the corporation is Applied Materials, Inc.
SECOND: The address of the corporation’s registered office in the State of Delaware is CorporationTrust Center, 1209 Orange StreetService Company, 251 Little Falls Drive, in the City of Wilmington,Delaware, County of New Castle, 19808-1674. The name of its registered agent at that address isThe CorporationTrustService Company.
THIRD: Reserved
THIRD: The name and mailing address of the incorporator of the corporation is: Donald A.
Slichter
Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe 55
Almaden Boulevard
San Jose, California 95113
FOURTH: The nature of the business or purposes to be conducted or promoted by the corporation is to engage in any lawful act or activity for which corporations may be organized under the General Corporation Law of Delaware.
FIFTH: 1. The corporation is authorized to issue two classes of shares to be designated, respectively, “Preferred Stock” and “Common Stock.” The number of shares of Preferred Stock authorized to be issued is One Million (1,000,000) and the number of shares of Common Stock authorized to be issued is Two Billion Five Hundred Million (2,500,000,000). The stock, whether Preferred Stock or Common Stock, shall have a par value of $.01 per share.
2. The shares of Preferred Stock may be issued from time to time in one or more series. The Board of Directors is authorized, by filing a certificate pursuant to the applicable law of the State of Delaware, to establish from time to time the number of shares to be included in each such series, and to fix the designation, powers, preferences and rights of the shares of each such series and the qualifications, limitations or restrictions thereof, including but not limited to the fixing or alteration of the dividend rights, dividend rate, conversion rights, voting rights, rights and terms of redemption (including sinking fund provisions), the redemption price or prices, and the liquidation preferences of any wholly unissued series of shares of Preferred Stock; and to increase or decrease the number of shares of any series subsequent to the issue of shares of that series, but not below the number of shares of such series then outstanding. In case the number of shares of any series shall be so decreased, the shares constituting such decrease shall resume the status which they had prior to the adoption of the resolution originally fixing the number of shares of such series.
SIXTH: In furtherance and not in limitation of the powers conferred by statute, the Board of Directors is expressly authorized to adopt, amend and repeal from time to time any or all of the bylaws of the corporation, including bylaw amendments increasing or reducing the authorized number of directors.
SEVENTH: No action shall be taken by the stockholders except at an annual or special meeting of stockholders. No action shall be taken by stockholders by written consent.
SEVENTH: 1. Action by Written Consent. Subject to the rights of the holders of any series of Preferred Stock or any other series or class of stock as set forth in this Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation to elect directors under specificcircumstances, all actions required or permitted to be taken by the stockholders of the corporation entitled to vote at an annual
Applied Materials, Inc. B-1
2. Request for Record Date. The record date for determining such stockholders entitled to consent to corporate action in writing without a meeting shall be as fixed by the Board of Directors or as otherwise established under this Article SEVENTH. Any stockholder of the corporation seeking to have the stockholders authorize or take corporate action by written consent without a meeting shall, by written request addressed to the secretary of this corporation and delivered by certified mail to the corporation’s principal executive offices and signed by one or more stockholders of record (“Record Stockholders”) of at least twenty percent (20%) of the outstanding shares of Common Stock of the corporation (the “Requisite Percentage”) (which shares are determined to be “Owned” by such Record Stockholders in accordance with Section 2.3 of the bylaws of the corporation, as may be amended from time to time) at the time such request is delivered that shall not revoke such request and that shall continue to be Record Stockholders of not less than the Requisite Percentage through the date of delivery of consents at the time such request is delivered to request that a record date be fixed for such purpose. The written request must contain the information set forth in paragraph3 of this Article SEVENTH. Following delivery of the request, the Board of Directors shall, by the later of (i) twenty (20) days after delivery of a valid request to set a record date and (ii) five (5) days after delivery of any information required by the corporation to determine the validity of the request for a record date or to determine whether the action to which the request relates may be effected by written consent under paragraph 4 of this Article SEVENTH, determine the validity of the request and whether the request relates to an action that may be taken by written consent and, if appropriate, adopt a resolution fixing the record date for such purpose. The record date for such purpose shall be no more than ten (10) days after the date upon which the resolution fixing the record date is adopted by the Board of Directors and shall not precede the date such resolution is adopted. If a request has been determined to be valid, to have been duly delivered to the secretary of the corporation and to relate to an action that may be effected by written consent pursuant to this Article SEVENTH or if no such determination shall have been made by the date required by this Article SEVENTH, and in either event no record date has been fixed by the Board of Directors, the record date shall be the first date on which a signed written consent relating to the action taken or proposed to be taken by written consent is delivered to this corporation in the manner described in paragraph 7 of this Article SEVENTH; provided that, if prior action by the Board of Directors is required under the provisions of Delaware law, the record date shall be at the close of business on the day on which the Board of Directors adopts the resolution taking such prior action.
3. Request Requirements. Any request required by paragraph 2 of this Article SEVENTH (a) must include documentary evidence of Ownership of the Requisite Percentage as of the date of such written request to the secretary of the corporation; provided, however, that if the Record Stockholders making the request are not the beneficial owners of the shares representing the Requisite Percentage, then to be valid, the request must also include documentary evidence (or, if not simultaneously provided with the request, such documentary evidence must be delivered to the secretary of the corporation within ten (10) days after the date on which the request is delivered to the secretary of the corporation) that the beneficial owners on whose behalf the request is made beneficially Own the Requisite Percentage as of the date on which such request is delivered to the secretary of the corporation, (b) must contain an agreement to solicit consents in accordance with this Article SEVENTH, (c) must provide a statement of the specific purpose or purposes of the proposal to be taken by written consent of stockholders, the matters proposed to be acted on the written consent of the stockholders and the reasons for conducting such business through a written consent of stockholders and any material interest in such business of each proposing Record Stockholder, and (d) must contain (i) such information and representations required by Section 2.5 of this corporation’s bylaws as though such requesting Record Stockholders are intending to nominate a candidate for director or propose other business to be brought before an annual meeting of stockholders, as applicable, and (ii) the text of the proposed action to be taken (including the text of any resolutions proposed to be adopted by written consent of stockholders and the language of any proposed amendment to the bylaws of this corporation). The corporation may require the Record Stockholders submitting such request to furnish such other information as may be requested by the corporation to determine whether the request relates to an action that may be effected by written consent under paragraph 4 of this Article SEVENTH. In connection with an action or actions proposed to be taken by written consent in accordance with this Article SEVENTH, the Record Stockholders seeking such action or actions shall further update andsupplement the information previously provided to the corporation in connection therewith, if necessary, as required by Section 2.5 of the corporation’s bylaws. Any Record Stockholder delivering a request required by paragraph 2 of this Article SEVENTH may revoke his, her or its request at any time by written revocation delivered by certified mail to the secretary of the corporation at the corporation’s principal executive offices. Any disposition by a Record Stockholder delivering a request required by paragraph 2 of this Article SEVENTH of any shares of common stock of the corporation (or of beneficial ownership of such shares by the beneficial owner on whose behalf the request was made) after the date of such request shall be deemed a revocation of the request with respect to such shares, and each such Record Stockholder and the applicable beneficial ownershall certify to the secretary of the corporation on the day prior to the record date set for the action by written consent as to
B-2 2020 Proxy Statement
APPENDIX B
whether any such disposition has occurred. If the unrevoked requests represent in the aggregate less than the Requisite Percentage, the Board of Directors, in its discretion, may cancel the action by written consent.
4. Actions Which May Be Taken by Written Consent. Stockholders are not entitled to act by written consent if in the good faith determination of the Board of Directors (a) the request for a record date for such action does not comply with this Article SEVENTH or the bylaws of the corporation, (b) the action relates to an item of business that is not a proper subject for stockholder action under applicable law, (c) the request for a record date for such action is received by the secretary of corporation during the period commencing ninety (90) days prior to the first anniversary of the date of the immediately preceding annual meeting and ending on the date of the final adjournment of the next annual meeting of stockholders, (d) an identical or substantially similar item of business, as determined in good faith by the Board of Directors of the corporation in its sole and absolute discretion, which determination shall be conclusive and binding on the corporation and its stockholders (a “Similar Item”), was presented at a meeting of stockholders held not more than ninety (90) days before the request for a record date for such action is received by the secretary of the corporation, (e) a Similar Item is included in the corporation’s notice of meeting as an item of business to be brought before an annual or special stockholders meeting that has been called but not yet held or that is called to be held within ninety (90) days after the request for a record date for such action is received by the secretary of the corporation, or (f) the request for a record date for such action was made in a manner that involved a violation of Regulation 14A under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or other applicable law. For purposes of this paragraph 4 of Article SEVENTH, the nomination, election or removal of directors shall be deemed to be a Similar Item with respect to all actions involving the nomination, election or removal of directors, changing the size of the board of directors and filling of vacancies and/or newly created directorships resulting from any increase in the authorized number of directors.
5. Manner of Consent Solicitation. Stockholders may take action by written consent only if consents are solicited by the stockholder or group of stockholders seeking to take action by written consent of stockholders from all Record Stockholders of capital stock of this corporation entitled to vote on the matter and in accordance with applicable law.
6. Date of Consent. Every written consent purporting to take or authorize the taking of corporate action (each such written consent is referred to in this paragraph and in paragraph 7as a “Consent”) must bear the date of signature of each Record Stockholder who signs the Consent, and no Consent shall be effective to take the corporate action referred to therein unless, within 60 days of the earliest dated Consent delivered in the manner required by paragraph 7 of this Article SEVENTH and not later than 120 days after the record date, consents signed by a sufficient number of Record Stockholders to take such action are so delivered to this corporation.
7. Delivery of Consents. No Consents may be dated or delivered to this corporation or its registered office in the State of Delaware until 60 days after the corporation has received a valid request to set a record date. Consents must be delivered to this corporation by delivery to its registered office in the State of Delaware or its principal executive offices. Delivery must be made by hand or by certified or registered mail, return receipt requested. In the event of the delivery to this corporation of Consents, the secretary of this corporation, or such other officer of this corporation as the Board of Directors may designate, shall provide for the safe-keeping of such Consents and any related revocations and shall promptly conduct such ministerial review of the sufficiency of all Consents and any related revocations and of the validity of the action to be taken by written consent as the secretary of this corporation, or such other officer of this corporation as the Board of Directors may designate, as the case may be, deems necessary or appropriate, including, without limitation, whether the Record Stockholders of a number of shares having the requisite voting power to authorize or take the action specified in Consents have given consent; provided, however, that if the action to which the Consents relate is the election or removal of one or more members of the Board of Directors, the secretary of this corporation, or such other officer of this corporation as the Board of Directors may designate, as the case may be, shall promptly designate two persons, who shall not be members of the Board of Directors, to serve as inspectors (“Inspectors”) with respect to such Consent, and such Inspectors shall discharge the functions of the secretary of this corporation, or such other officer of this corporation as the Board of Directors may designate, as the case may be, under this Article SEVENTH. If after such investigation the secretary of this corporation, such other officer of this corporation as the Board of Directors may designate or the Inspectors, as the case may be, shall determine that the action purported to have been taken is duly authorized by the Consents, that fact shall be certified on the records of this corporation kept for the purpose of recording the proceedings of meetings of stockholders and the Consents shall be filed in such records. In conducting the investigation required by this section, the secretary of this corporation, such other officer of this corporation as the Board of Directors may designate or the Inspectors, as the case may be, may, at the expense of this corporation, retain special legal counsel and any other necessary or appropriate professional advisors as such person or persons may deem necessary or appropriate and, to the fullest extent permitted by law, shall be fully protected in relying in good faith upon the opinion of such counsel or advisors.
8. Effectiveness of Consent. If the Board of Directors shall determine that any request to fix a record date or to take stockholder action by written consent was not properly made in accordance with, or relates to an action that may not be effected by writtenconsent pursuant to, this Article SEVENTH, or the Record Stockholder or Record Stockholders seeking to take such action do
Applied Materials, Inc. B-3
not otherwise comply with this Article SEVENTH, then the Board of Directors shall not be required to fix a record date and any such purported action by written consent shallbe null and void to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law. No action bywritten consent without a meeting shall be effective until such date as the secretary of this corporation, such other officer of this corporation as the Board of Directors may designate, or the Inspectors, as applicable, certify to this corporation that the Consents delivered to this corporation in accordance with paragraph 7 of this Article SEVENTH, represent at least the minimum number of votes that would be necessary to take the corporate action at a meeting at which all shares entitled to vote thereon were present and voted, in accordance with Delaware law and this Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation.
9. Challenge to Validity of Consent. Nothing contained in this Article SEVENTH shall in any way be construed to suggest or imply that the Board of Directors of this corporation or any stockholder shall not be entitled to contest the validity of any Consent or related revocations, whether before or after such certification by the secretary of this corporation, such other officer of this corporation as the Board of Directors may designate or the Inspectors, as the case may be, or to take any other action (including, without limitation, the commencement, prosecution or defense of any litigation with respect thereto, and the seeking of injunctive relief in such litigation).
10. Board-solicited Stockholder Action by Written Consent. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth above, (x) none of the foregoing provisions of this Article SEVENTH shall apply to any solicitation of stockholder action by written consent by or at the direction of the Board of Directors and (y) the Board of Directors shall be entitled to solicit stockholder action by written consent in accordance with applicable law.
EIGHTH: Elections of directors need not be by written ballot unless the bylaws of the corporation shall so provide.
NINTH: A director of the corporation shall not be personally liable to the corporation or its stockholders for monetary damages for breach of fiduciary duty as a director, except for liability (i) for any breach of the director’s duty of loyalty to the corporation or its stockholders, (ii) for acts or omissions not in good faith or which involve intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law, (iii) under Section 174 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, or (iv) for any transaction from which the director derived an improper personal benefit.
TENTH: 1. Each person who was or is made a party or is threatened to be made a party to or is involved in any action, suit or proceeding, whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative (hereinafter a “proceeding”), by reason of the fact that he or she, or a person of whom he or she is the legal representative, is or was a director, officer, employee or agent, of the corporation or is or was serving at the request of the corporation as a director, officer, employee or agent of another corporation or of a partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise, including service with respect to employee benefit plans, whether the basis of such proceeding is alleged action in an official capacity as a director, officer, employee or agent or in any other capacity while serving as a director, officer, employee or agent, shall be indemnified and held harmless by the corporation to the fullest extent authorized by the Delaware General Corporation Law, against all expense, liability and loss (including attorneys’ fees, judgments, fines, ERISA excise taxes or penalties and amounts paid or to be paid in settlement) reasonably incurred or suffered by such person in connection therewith and such indemnification shall continue as to a person who has ceased to be a director, officer, employee or agent and shall inure to the benefit of his or her heirs, executors and administrators; provided, however, that, except as provided in paragraph 2 hereof, the corporation shall indemnify any such person seeking indemnification in connection with a proceeding (or part thereof) initiated by such person only if such proceeding (or part thereof) was authorized by the Board of Directors of the corporation. The right to indemnification conferred in this Article shall be a contract right.
2. If a claim under paragraph 1 of this Article is not paid in full by the corporation within 30 days after a written claim has been received by the corporation, the claimant may at any time thereafter bring suit against the corporation to recover the unpaid amount of the claim and, if successful in whole or in part, the claimant shall be entitled to be paid also the expense of prosecuting such claim. It shall be a defense to any such action (other than an action brought to enforce a claim for expenses incurred in defending any proceeding in advance of its final disposition where the required undertaking, if any is required, has been tendered to the corporation) that the claimant has not met the standards of conduct which make it permissible under the Delaware General Corporation Law for the corporation to indemnify the claimant for the amount claimed.
3. The right to indemnification conferred in this Article shall not be exclusive of any other right which any person may have or hereafter acquire under any statute, provision of theAmended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, bylaw, agreement, vote of stockholders or disinterested directors or otherwise.
4. The corporation may maintain insurance, at its expense, to protect itself and any director, officer, employee or agent of the corporation or another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise against any such expense, liability or loss, whether or not the corporation would have the power to indemnify such person against such expense, liability or loss under the Delaware General Corporation Law.
ELEVENTH: The corporation reserves the right to amend, alter, change or repeal any provision contained in thisAmended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, in the manner now or hereafter prescribed by statute, and all rights conferred on
B-4 2020 Proxy Statement
APPENDIX B
stockholders herein are granted subject to this reservation. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the provisions set forth in thisAmended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, including this Article ELEVENTH, may not be amended or repealed in any respect unless such amendment or repeal is approved by the affirmative vote of not less than a majority of the total voting power of all outstanding shares of stock in this corporation entitled to vote thereon.
THE UNDERSIGNED, being the incorporator hereinbefore named, for the purpose of forming a corporation to do business both within and without the State of Delaware, and in pursuance of the Delaware Corporation Law, does hereby make and file this Certificate.
/s/ Donald A. Slichter
Donald. A. Slichter
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Applied Materials, Inc. has been executed by its duly authorized officer this [ ] day of [ ], 20[ ].
| Applied Materials, Inc. | ||
| By: | ||
| �� | Name: | |
| Title | ||
Applied Materials, Inc. B-5
DIRECTIONS TO APPLIED MATERIALS BOWERS CAMPUS3050 Bowers Avenue, Building 1, Santa Clara, California 95054 DIRECTIONS FROM HIGHWAY 101 Exit onto Bowers Avenue / Great America Parkway Proceed to Bowers Avenue Cross Scott Boulevard Applied Materials Bowers Campus is on your right Turn RIGHT into the 2nd driveway between Buildings 1 and 2 Proceed between Buildings 1 and 2 to the covered parking lot The entrance to Building 1 is located to the left of the parking lot DIRECTIONS FROM INTERSTATE 280 Exit onto Lawrence Expressway / Stevens Creek BoulevardProceed to Lawrence Expressway North. Continue for approximately 4 milesTurn RIGHT onto Arques Avenue Proceed on Arques Avenue, which becomes Scott Boulevard Turn RIGHT onto Bowers Aveune Applied Materials Bowers Campus is on your right Turn RIGHT into the 2nd driveway between Buildings 1 and 2Proceed between Buildings 1 and 2 to the covered parking lot The entrance to Building 1 is located to the left of the parking lot
3225 OAKMEAD VILLAGE DRIVE P.O. BOX 58039, M/S 1241 SANTA CLARA, CA 95054 YOU CAN VOTE OVER THE INTERNET OR BY TELEPHONE QUICK · EASY · CONVENIENT AVAILABLE 24 HOURS A DAY · 7 DAYS A WEEK APPLIED MATERIALS, INC. encourages you to take advantage of convenient ways to vote. If voting by proxy, you may vote over the Internet, by telephone or by mail. Your Internet or 3225 OAKMEAD VILLAGE DRIVE telephone vote authorizes the named proxies to vote in the same manner as if you marked, signed, and returned your proxy card. To vote over the Internet, by telephone or by mail, P.O. BOX 58039, M/S 1241 please read the 20182020 Proxy Statement and then follow these easy steps: SANTA CLARA, CA 95054 VOTE BY INTERNET-www.proxyvote.comINTERNET - www.proxyvote.com Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time on March 7, 2018.11, 2020. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web site and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form. ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF FUTURE PROXY MATERIALS If you would like to reduce the costs incurred by Applied Materials, Inc. in mailing proxy materials, you can consent to receiving all future proxy statements, proxy cards and annual reports electronically over the Internet. To sign up for electronic delivery, please follow the instructions above to vote using the Internet and, when prompted, indicate that you agree to receive or access proxy materials electronically in the future. VOTE BYPHONE-1-800-690-6903 PHONE - 1-800-690-6903 Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time on March 7, 2018.11, 2020. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions. VOTE BY MAIL Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to APPLIED MATERIALS, INC., c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717. TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS E35556-P01027-Z71625FOLLOWS: E88857-Z76235 KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED.SIGNED AND DATED. DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY APPLIED MATERIALS, INC. The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR all of the nominees listed below and FOR proposals 2, 3 and 3:4: 1. Election of Directors Nominees: For Against Abstain Nominees: 1a. Judy Bruner 1b. Xun (Eric) Chen 1c. Aart J. de Geus 1d. Gary E. Dickerson 1e. Stephen R. Forrest 1f. Thomas J. Iannotti 1g. Alexander A. Karsner 1h. Adrianna C. Ma 1i. Yvonne McGill 1j. Scott A. McGregor Please indicate if you plan to attend this meeting. Yes No For Against Abstain 2. Approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation 1c. Aart J. de Geus of Applied Materials’ named executive officers for fiscal year 2017.1d. Gary E. Dickerson2019. 3. Ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP as Applied Materials’ independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2018. 1e. Stephen R. Forrest The Board2020. 4. Approval of Directors recommends you vote AGAINST 1f. Thomas J. Iannotti proposals 4an amendment and 5: For Against Abstain 1g. Alexander A. Karsner 4. Shareholder proposalrestatement of Applied Materials’ Certificate of Incorporation to provide for rightallow shareholders to act by written consent 1h. Adrianna C. Ma 5. Shareholder proposal for annual disclosure ofEEO-1 data. 1i. Scott A. McGregorconsent. NOTE: The proposals to be voted on may also include such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof. 1j. Dennis D. Powell Please indicate if you plan to attend this meeting. Yes No Please sign exactly as your name appears herein. When shares are held by joint tenants, both should sign. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, trustee or guardian, please give full title as such. If a corporation, please sign in full corporate name by president or other authorized officer. If a partnership, please sign in partnership name by authorized person. Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX] Date Signature (Joint Owners) Date
Important notice regarding the availability of proxy materials for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on March 8, 2018:12, 2020: The Proxy Statement and Annual Report to Shareholders are available at www.proxyvote.com.APPLIEDwww.proxyvote.com. E88858-Z76235 APPLIED MATERIALS, INC.PROXYINC. PROXY FOR ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS ON MARCH 8, 201812, 2020 THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS The undersigned hereby appoints Gary E. Dickerson, Daniel J. Durn and Thomas F. Larkins,Christina Y. Lai, or any of them, each with full power of substitution, as proxies of the undersigned, to attend the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Applied Materials, Inc. to be held on Thursday, March 8, 201812, 2020 at 11:00 a.m. Pacific Time at Applied Materials, Inc.‘s’s corporate offices at 3050 Bowers Avenue, Building 1, Santa Clara, California 95054, and at any adjournment or postponement thereof, and to vote the number of shares the undersigned would be entitled to vote if personally present on the items set forth on the reverse side and, in their discretion, upon such other business that may properly come before such meeting and any adjournment or postponement thereof.THISthereof. THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED AS SPECIFIED, OR IF NO CHOICE IS SPECIFIED, WILL BE VOTED FOR EACH OF THE TEN NOMINEES FOR ELECTION AS DIRECTORS (PROPOSAL 1), FOR THE APPROVAL, ON AN ADVISORY BASIS, OF THE COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS FOR FISCAL YEAR 20172019 (PROPOSAL 2), FOR THE RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF KPMG LLP AS OUR INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR FISCAL YEAR 20182020 (PROPOSAL 3), AGAINST AND FOR THE SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALAPPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT AND RESTATEMENT OF OUR CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION TO PROVIDE FOR RIGHTALLOW SHAREHOLDERS TO ACT BY WRITTEN CONSENT (PROPOSAL 4) AND AGAINST THE SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL FOR ANNUAL DISCLOSURE OFEEO-1 DATA (PROPOSAL 5). Dear Shareholder: On the reverse side of this card are instructions on how to vote over the Internet or by telephone for the election of directors (Proposal 1), for the approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of our named executive officers for fiscal year 20172019 (Proposal 2), for the ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 20182020 (Proposal 3), against and for the shareholder proposalapproval of an amendment and restatement of our Certificate of Incorporation to provide for rightallow shareholders to act by written consent (Proposal 4) and against the shareholder proposal for annual disclosure ofEEO-1 data (Proposal 5). Please consider voting over the Internet or by telephone. Your vote is recorded as if you mailed in your proxy card. We believe voting this way is convenient. Thank you for your attention to these matters. Applied Materials, Inc. PLEASE SIGN, DATE AND MAIL THIS PROXY CARD PROMPTLY USING THE ENCLOSED POSTAGE-PAID ENVELOPE. If you vote over the Internet or by telephone, you do not need to return the proxy card. THANK YOU FOR VOTING! (Continued and to be signed on the reverse side)
